UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.    )

Filed by the Registrant  þ

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ¨

Check the appropriate box:

 

¨

Preliminary Proxy Statement

¨

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

þ

Definitive Proxy Statement

¨

Definitive Additional Materials

¨

Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12§240.14a-12

McDermott International, Inc.

 

 

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 

þ

No fee required.

¨

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and0-11.

 

 (1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 

 

 (2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 

 

 (3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange ActRule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

 

 

 (4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

 

 

 (5)

Total fee paid:

 

 

 

¨

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

 

¨

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

 (1)

Amount Previously Paid:

 

 

 

 (2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

 

 

 (3)

Filing Party:

 

 

 

 (4)

Date Filed:

 

 


LOGO

  

McDermott International, Inc.

Stephen M. Johnson

David Dickson

  757 N. Eldridge Pkwy.
Chairman of the Board of Directors,

President and Chief Executive Officer

  Houston, Texas 77079

March 30, 201224, 2014

Dear Stockholder:

You are cordially invited to attend this year’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders of McDermott International, Inc., which will be held on Thursday,Tuesday, May 10, 2012,6, 2014, at 757 N. Eldridge Parkway,The Westin Houston Hotel, 945 Gessner Road, Houston, Texas 77079, on the 14th floor,77024, commencing at 10:00 a.m., local time. The notice of Annual Meeting and proxy statement following this letter describe the matters to be acted on at the meeting.

McDermott is utilizing the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Notice and Access proxy rule, which allows companies to furnish proxy materials via the Internet as an alternative to the traditional approach of mailing a printed set to each stockholder. In accordance with these rules, we have sent a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to all stockholders who have not previously elected to receive a printed set of proxy materials. The Notice contains instructions on how to access our 20122014 Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Stockholders, as well as how to vote either online, by telephone or in person at the 20122014 Annual Meeting.

It is very important that your shares are represented and voted at the Annual Meeting. Please vote your shares by Internet or telephone, or, if you received a printed set of materials by mail, by returning the accompanying proxy card, as soon as possible to ensure that your shares are voted at the meeting. Further instructions on how to vote your shares can be found in our Proxy Statement.

Thank you for your support of our company.

Sincerely yours,

LOGO

LOGO

STEPHEN M. JOHNSONDAVID DICKSON

 

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT.

Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, please take a few minutes now to vote your shares.


Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to beBe Held on May 10, 2012.6, 2014.

The proxy statement and annual report are available on the Internet at www.proxyvote.com.

The following information applicable to the Annual Meeting may be found in the proxy statement and accompanying proxy card:

 

The date, time and location of the meeting;

 

A list of the matters intended to be acted on and our recommendations regarding those matters;

 

Any control/identification numbers that you need to access your proxy card; and

 

Information about attending the meeting and voting in person.


McDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.

757 N. Eldridge Pkwy.

Houston, Texas 77079

 

 

NOTICENOTICE OF 2012 ANNUAL MEETING 2014 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS STOCKHOLDERS

 

 

 

Time and DateLocation

10:00 a.m., local time, on Thursday,Tuesday, May 10, 20126, 2014

The Westin Houston Hotel

945 Gessner Road

Houston, Texas 77024

 

Place

757 N. Eldridge Parkway
14th Floor
Houston, Texas 77079

Items of Business

1.

To elect eight members to our Board of Directors, each for a term of one year.

 

 2.

To conduct an advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation.

 

 3.

To approve our 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan.

4.

To ratify our Audit Committee’s appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2012.2014.

 

 4.5.

To transact such other business that properly comes before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.

 

Record Date

You are entitled to vote if you were a stockholder of record at the close of business on March 12, 2012.7, 2014.

 

Notice and Access

Instead of mailing a printed copy of our proxy materials, including our Annual Report, to each stockholder of record, we are providing access to these materials via the Internet. This reduces the amount of paper necessary to produce these materials, as well as the costs associated with mailing these materials to all stockholders. Accordingly, on March 30, 2012,24, 2014, we began mailing a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) to all stockholders of record as of March 12, 2012,7, 2014, and posted our proxy materials on the Web site referenced in the Notice (www.proxyvote.com). As more fully described in the Notice, all stockholders may choose to access our proxy materials on the Web site referred to in the Notice and/or may request a printed set of our proxy materials. In addition, the Notice and Web site provide information regarding how you may request to receive proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by email on an ongoing basis.

 

Proxy Voting

Your vote is important. Please vote your proxy promptly so your shares can be represented, even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting. You can vote by Internet, by telephone, or by requesting a printed copy of the proxy materials and using the proxy card enclosed with the printed materials.

Admission to the Meeting

Attendance at the meeting is limited to stockholders and beneficial owners as of the record date or duly appointed proxies. No guests will be admitted, except for guests invited by McDermott. Registration will begin at 9:00 a.m., and the meeting will begin promptly at 10:00 a.m. If your shares are held in “street name” through a broker, bank, trustee or other nominee, you are a beneficial owner, and beneficial owners will need to show proof of beneficial ownership, such as a copy of a brokerage account statement, reflecting stock ownership as of the record date in order to be admitted to the meeting. If you are a proxy holder for a stockholder, you will need to bring a validly executed proxy naming you as the proxy holder, together with proof of record ownership of the stockholder naming you as proxy holder. Please note that you may be asked to present valid photo identification, such as a valid driver’s license or passport, when you check in for registration.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

 

LOGO

LIANE K. HINRICHS

Secretary

March 30, 201224, 2014


 

PROXY STATEMENTPROXY STATEMENT FOR 2012 ANNUAL MEETING

2014 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS STOCKHOLDERS

 

 

TABLETABLE OF CONTENTS CONTENTS

 

   Page 

Proxy Summary

i

Questions and Answers about the Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Voting

   1  

Election of Directors (Item 1)

   56  

Corporate GovernanceElection Process

   106  

Director IndependenceQualifications

   106  

Executive Sessions and Communications With the BoardDirector Nominations

   106  

Board of Directors and Its Committees2014 Nominees

7

Corporate Governance

   11  

Compensation Policies and Practices and RiskDirector Independence

   1411  

Director Nomination ProcessExecutive Sessions

12

Communications with the Board

12

Board of Directors and Its Committees

12

The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

   15  

Compensation Policies and Practices and Risk

15

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

16

Compensation of Directors

   17  

Director Compensation Table

   17  

Named ExecutivesExecutive Officer Profiles

   18  

Executive Officers

24

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

   2523  

Executive Summary

23

How We Make Compensation Decisions

26

Compensation Philosophy

26

Impact of 2013 Say-on-Pay Vote on Executive Compensation

26

Defining Market Range Compensation — Benchmarking

27

What We Pay and Why: Elements of Total Direct Compensation

28

2013 NEO Compensation

30

2013 Other Compensation Elements

35

Other Compensation Policies and Practices

37

2013 Peer Groups

39

Compensation Committee Report

40

Compensation of Executive Officers

41

Summary Compensation Table

41

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

   43  

Compensation of Executive Officers

44

Summary Compensation Table

44

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

46

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-EndYear End

45

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

47

Pension Benefits

   48  

Option Exercises and Stock VestedNonqualified Deferred Compensation

   50  

Pension BenefitsPotential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

   51  

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

54

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

55

Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive OfficerNEO Compensation (Item 2)

   6056  

Vote to Approve the 2014 LTIP (Item 3)

59

Audit Committee Report

   6469  

Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for Year Ending December  31, 20122014 (Item 3)4)

65

Security Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers

67

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

68

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

69

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Compliance

   70  

Stockholders’ ProposalsSecurity Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers

   7072

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

73

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

74

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Compliance

74

Stockholders’ Proposals

74

Appendix A — 2014 McDermott International, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan

A-1  


QUESTIONSAND ANSWERSABOUTTHE ANNUAL MEETINGOF STOCKHOLDERSAND VOTINGPROXY SUMMARY

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement. This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider, and you should read the entire proxy statement carefully. As used in this proxy statement, unless the context otherwise indicates or requires, references to “McDermott,” “we,” “us,” and “our” mean McDermott International, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.

Annual Meeting of Stockholders

•    Time and Date:

10:00 a.m., Central Time, May 6, 2014

•    Place:

The Westin Houston Hotel

945 Gessner Road

Houston, Texas 77024

•    Record Date:

March 7, 2014

•    Voting:

Stockholders as of the record date are entitled to vote. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote for each director nominee and one vote for each of the other proposals to be voted on.

Items of Business for the Annual Meeting

Item of Business

Board Vote

Recommendation

Page

Reference

Election of directors

FOR Each Director Nominee6

Advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation

FOR56

Approval of the 2014 McDermott International, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan (“2014 LTIP”)

FOR59

Ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as auditor for 2014

FOR70

Your vote is important. Please vote your proxy promptly so your shares can be represented, even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting. Stockholders of record can vote by Internet, by telephone, or by requesting a printed copy of the proxy materials and using the proxy card enclosed with the printed materials.

Election of Directors — Item 1

The Board of Directors has nominated eight candidates, each for a one-year term. Our Board of Directors recommends that stockholders vote “For” each of the nominees named below.

                     
Name Age  Director
Since
  Independent  Committee Memberships
    Audit Compensation Finance Governance
                     

John F. Bookout, III

  60    2006    X     X X

Roger A. Brown

  69    2005    X    X  Chairman

David Dickson

  46    2013       

Stephen G. Hanks

  63    2009    X   X  X 

Gary P. Luquette

  58    2013    X    X X 

William H. Schumann, III

  63    2012    X   X   X

Mary L. Shafer-Malicki

  53    2011    X    Chairman X 

David A. Trice

  66    2009    X   Chairman X    
                     

i


2013 Compensation Program and Realizable Value of Performance-Based Awards

McDermott’s compensation programs are designed to develop, attract, retain and motivate qualified employees to create, expand and execute sound business opportunities for our company. The Compensation Committee is committed to targeting reasonable and competitive total direct compensation for our named executive officers (our “NEOs”), with a significant portion of that compensation being performance-based. Reflecting the Compensation Committee’s philosophy, compensation arrangements in 2013 provided for:

 

Three elements of target total direct compensation — annual base salary, annual incentive and long-term incentives;

NEO target total direct compensation, on average, being comprised 64% of performance-based compensation (excluding Mr. Dickson, who joined McDermott on October 31, 2013);

NEO annual incentives being comprised 100% of performance-based compensation (excluding Mr. Dickson); and

NEO target long-term incentive, or LTI, compensation being comprised 75% of performance-based compensation (excluding Mr. Dickson).

Although McDermott had revenues for the year ended December 31, 2013 of $2.7 billion and year-end backlog of $4.8 billion, our company recognized an operating loss in 2013, which, in accordance with our Compensation Committee’s philosophy and program, and based on the value of our common stock at year end, resulted in:

No NEO annual bonus awards being earned with respect to 2013.

NEO stock options granted in 2011, 2012 and 2013 having no realizable value as of December 31, 2013.

NEO performance shares granted in 2011, 2012 and 2013 having no realizable value as of December 31, 2013.

The following table summarizes the 2013 performance-based compensation opportunities, as compared to the realizable value of such opportunities as of December 31, 2013, for each of our NEOs, excluding Mr. Dickson:

2013 Performance-Based Compensation Opportunity vs.

Realizable Value as of December 31, 2013

LOGO

ii


(1)

Opportunity Values for EICP are disclosed at the NEOs’ target EICP award.

(2)

Opportunity Values for performance shares and stock options are disclosed at the grant date fair value of the respective awards.

(3)

The 2013 realizable values shown above are measured as of December 31, 2013. The value of performance share awards shown above is based on the estimated payout as a percent of target, or 0% of the performance shares granted in 2013, multiplied by the closing price of our common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange as of December 31, 2013 ($9.16). The number of the performance shares granted in 2013 that ultimately vest, if any, will be determined by reference to performance goals over a three-year period. See “Long-Term Incentives.” The vesting of any of these performance shares would impact the future realizable value of these performance share awards. In addition, an increase in our stock price compared to our stock price at December 31, 2013 may impact the future realizable value of the stock option awards granted in 2013.

Compensation and Corporate Governance Policies and Procedures

The Board has implemented several policies and structures that we believe are “best practices” in corporate governance, including:

Separating the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer roles;

Holding Board meeting executive sessions with independent directors only present;

Maintaining minimum stock ownership guidelines applicable to directors and executive officers;

Approving a policy prohibiting all directors, officers and employees from engaging in “short sales” or trading in puts, calls or other options on McDermott’s common stock, and from engaging in hedging transactions and from holding McDermott shares in a margin account or pledging McDermott shares as collateral for a loan;

Eliminating excise tax gross-ups; and

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors engaging Pay Governance LLC, an independent executive compensation consultant.

Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation — Item 2

Our stockholders have the opportunity to cast a non-binding advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers. Last year, over 96% of the votes cast on this proposal were in favor of our executive compensation program. We recommend that you review our Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 23, which explains the philosophy of the Compensation Committee and its actions and decisions during 2013 regarding our compensation programs. Our Board of Directors recommends that stockholders vote “For” the advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation.

Approval of the 2014 McDermott International, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan — Item 3

We are asking our stockholders to approve the 2014 McDermott International, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2014 LTIP”) to replace the 2009 McDermott International, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2009 LTIP”). On March 6, 2014, our Board of Directors adopted, subject to stockholder approval, the 2014 LTIP reserving 6,600,000 shares for issuance pursuant to awards thereunder. A total of 774,507 shares remain available for issuance under the 2009 LTIP as of March 7, 2014. The 2014 LTIP would also provide certain updates and governance-related enhancements as described below under “Vote to Approve the 2014 LTIP (Item 3).”

iii


The proposed adoption of the 2014 LTIP will allow us to continue to fully utilize equity incentive compensation as a means of aligning the interests of participants with those of our stockholders and providing participants with further incentives for outstanding performance. As a result, we believe strongly that the adoption of the 2014 LTIP is important to our ability to recruit and retain executive officers, directors and key employees with outstanding ability and experience essential to our long-term growth and financial success.

Our Board of Directors recommends that stockholders vote “For” the approval of the 2014 LTIP.

Ratification of Appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Auditors — Item 4

Our Board of Directors has ratified our Audit Committee’s appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as McDermott’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2014, and as a matter of good governance, we are seeking stockholder ratification of this appointment.

Our Board of Directors recommends that stockholders vote “For” the ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as McDermott’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2014.

Communicating with the Board of Directors

Stockholders or other interested persons may send written communications to the independent members of our Board, addressed to Board of Directors (independent members), c/o McDermott International, Inc., Corporate Secretary’s Office, 757 N. Eldridge Pkwy., Houston, Texas 77079.

iv


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS AND VOTING

What is the purpose of these proxy materials?

As more fully described in the Notice, the Board of Directors of McDermott International, Inc. (“McDermott”) has made these materials available to you in connection with our 20122014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will take place on May 10, 20126, 2014 at 10:00 a.m., local time (the “Annual Meeting” or “Meeting”). We mailed the Notice to our stockholders beginning March 30, 2012,24, 2014, and our proxy materials were posted on the Web site referenced in the Notice on that same date.

McDermott, on behalf of its Board of Directors, is soliciting your proxy to vote your shares at the 20122014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. We solicit proxies to give all stockholders of record an opportunity to vote on matters that will be presented at the Annual Meeting. In this proxy statement, you will find information on these matters, which is provided to assist you in voting your shares.

Who will pay for the cost of this proxy solicitation?

We will bear all expenses incurred in connection with this proxy solicitation, which we expect to conduct primarily by mail. We have engaged The Proxy Advisory Group, LLC to assist in the solicitation for a fee that will not exceed $12,500, plus out-of-pocket expenses. In addition, our officers and regular employees may solicit your proxy by telephone, by facsimile transmission or in person, for which they will not be separately compensated. If your shares are held through a broker or other nominee (i.ei.e.., in “street name”) and you have requested printed versions of these materials, we have requested that your broker or nominee forward this proxy statement to you and obtain your voting instructions, for which we will reimburse them for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses. If your shares are held through the McDermott Thrift Plan and you have requested printed versions of these materials, the trustee of that plan has sent you this proxy statement and you can instruct the trustee on how to vote your plan shares.

Who is entitled to vote at, and who may attend, the Annual Meeting?

Our Board of Directors selected March 12, 20127, 2014 as the record date (the “Record Date”) for determining stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. This means that if you owned McDermott common

stock on the Record Date, you may vote your shares on the matters to be considered by our stockholders at the Annual Meeting.

There were 235,564,418237,417,010 shares of our common stock outstanding on the Record Date. Each outstanding share of common stock entitles its holder to one vote on each matter to be acted on at the meeting.

Attendance at the meeting is limited to stockholders and beneficial owners as of the record date or duly appointed proxies. No guests will be admitted, except for guests invited by McDermott. Registration will begin at 9:00 a.m., and the meeting will begin promptly at 10:00 a.m. If your shares are held in “street name” through a broker, bank, trustee or other nominee, you are a beneficial owner, and beneficial owners will need to show proof of beneficial ownership, such as a copy of a brokerage account statement, reflecting stock ownership as of the record date in order to be admitted to the meeting. If you are a proxy holder for a stockholder, you will need to bring a validly executed proxy naming you as the proxy holder, together with proof of record ownership of the stockholder naming you as proxy holder. Please note that you may be asked to present valid photo identification, such as a valid driver’s license or passport, when you check in for registration. No cameras, recording equipment or other electronic devices will be allowed to be brought into the meeting room by stockholders or beneficial owners.

What is the difference between holding shares as a stockholder of record and as a beneficial owner through a brokerage account or other arrangement with a holder of record?

If your shares are registered in your name with McDermott’s transfer agent and registrar, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., you are the “stockholder of record” of those shares. The Notice and the proxy materials have been provided or made available directly to you by McDermott.

If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other holder of record, you are considered the “beneficial owner” but not the holder of record of those shares, and the Notice and the proxy materials have been forwarded to you by your broker, bank or other holder of record. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or other holder of record how to vote your shares by using the voting instruction card or by following their instructions for voting by telephone or on the Internet.

How do I cast my vote?

Most stockholders can vote by proxy in three ways:

 

  

by Internet atwww.proxyvote.com;

 

by telephone; or

 

by mail.

If you are a stockholder of record, you can vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting or vote now by giving us your proxy. You may give us your proxy by following the instructions included in the Notice or, if you received a printed version of these proxy materials, in the enclosed proxy card. If you want to vote by mail but have not received a printed version of these proxy materials, you may request a full packet of proxy materials throughby following the instructions in the Notice. If you vote using either the telephone or the Internet, you will save us mailing expense.

By giving us your proxy, you will be directing us how to vote your shares at the meeting. Even if you plan on attending the meeting, we urge you to vote now by giving us your proxy. This will ensure that your vote is represented at the meeting. If you do attend the meeting, you can change your vote at that time, if you then desire to do so.

If you are the beneficial owner but not the holder of record, of shares, you should refer to the instructions provided by your broker or nominee for further information. The broker or nominee that holds your shares has the authority to vote them, absent your approval, only as to matters for which they have discretionary authority under the applicable New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) rules. Neither the election of directors, nor the advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation, nor the approval of the 2014 LTIP are considered routine matters. That means that brokers may not vote your shares with respect to those matters if you have not given your broker specific instructions as to how to vote. Please be sure to give specific voting instructions to your broker.

If you received a printed version of these proxy materials, you should have received a voting instruction form from your broker or nominee that holds your shares. For shares of which you are the beneficial owner but not the holder of record, follow the instructions contained in the Notice or voting instruction form to vote by Internet, telephone or mail. If you want to vote by mail but have not received a printed version of these proxy materials, you may request a full packet of proxy materials as instructed by the Notice. If you want to vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting, you must obtain a valid proxy from your broker or nominee. You should contact your broker or nominee or refer to the instructions provided by your broker or nominee for further information. Additionally, the availability of telephone or Internet voting depends on the voting process used by the broker or nominee that holds your shares.

Why did I receive more than one Notice or proxy statement and proxy card or voting instruction form?

You may receive more than one Notice, or proxy statement, and proxy card or voting instruction form if your shares are held through more than one account (e.g., through different brokers or nominees). Each proxy card or voting instruction form only covers those shares of common stock held in the applicable account. If you hold shares in more than one account,

you will have to provide voting instructions as to alleach of your accounts in order to vote all your shares.

What can I do if I change my mind after I vote?

If you are a stockholder of record, you may change your vote by written notice to our Corporate Secretary, by granting a new proxy before the Annual Meeting or by voting in person at the Annual Meeting. Unless you attend the meeting and vote your shares in person, you should change your vote before the meeting using the same method (by telephone, Internet or mail) that you first used to vote your shares. That way, the inspectors of election for the meeting will be able to verify your latest vote.

If you are the beneficial owner, but not the holder of record, of shares, you should follow the instructions in the information provided by your broker or nominee to change your vote before the meeting. If you want to change your vote as to shares of which you are the beneficial owner by voting in person at the Annual Meeting, you must obtain a valid proxy from the broker or nominee that holds those shares for you.

What is a broker non-vote?

If you are a beneficial owner whose shares are held of record by a broker or other holder of record, you must instruct the broker or other holder of record how to vote your shares. If you do not provide voting instructions, your shares will not be voted on any proposal on which the broker does not have discretionary authority to vote. This is called a “broker non-vote.” In these cases, the broker or other holder of record can include your shares as being present at the Annual Meeting for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum but will not be able to vote on those matters for which specific authorization is required under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”).NYSE.

With respect to this Annual Meeting, if you are a beneficial owner whose shares are held by a broker or other holder of record, your broker or other holder of record has discretionary voting authority under NYSE rules to vote your shares on the ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”), even if it has not received voting instructions from you. However, such holder does not have discretionary authority to vote on the election of directors, or the advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation or to approve the 2014 LTIP without instructions from you, in which case a broker non-vote will occur and your shares will not be voted on those matters.

What is the quorum for the Annual Meeting?

The Annual Meeting will be held only if a quorum exists. The presence at the meeting, in person or by proxy, of holders of a majority of our outstanding shares of common stock as of the Record Date will constitute a quorum. If you attend the meeting or vote your shares by Internet, telephone or mail, your shares will be counted toward a quorum, even if you abstain from voting on a particular matter. Broker non-votes will be treated as present for the purpose of determining a quorum.

Which items will be voted on at the Annual Meeting?

At the Annual Meeting, we are asking you to vote on the following:

 

the election of John F. Bookout, III, Roger A. Brown, David Dickson, Stephen G. Hanks, Stephen M. Johnson, D. Bradley McWilliams, Thomas C. Schievelbein,Gary P. Luquette, William H. Schumann, III, Mary L. Shafer-Malicki and David A. Trice to our Board of Directors, each for a term of one year;

 

the advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation;

the approval of the 2014 LTIP; and

 

the ratification of our Audit Committee’s appointment of Deloitte as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2012.2014.

We are not aware of any other matters that may be presented or acted on at the Annual Meeting. If you vote by signing and returning the enclosed proxy card or using the telephone or Internet voting procedures, the individuals named as proxies on the card may vote your shares, in their discretion, on any other matter requiring a stockholder vote that comes before the meeting.

What are the Board’s voting recommendations?

For the reasons set forth in more detail later in this proxy statement, our Board recommends a vote:

 

FOR the election of each director nominee;

 

FOR the advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation;

FOR the approval of the 2014 LTIP; and

 

FOR the ratification of our Audit Committee’s appointment of Deloitte as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2012.2014.

What are the voting requirements to elect the Directors and to approve each of the proposals discussed in this proxy statement?

Our By-Laws provide that, in all matters arising at a stockholders’ meeting,Each proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of our outstanding shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote and actually voting on the matter shall be necessarymatter. Because abstentions and sufficient for approval, except where some larger percentage is required by applicable law or our Articles of Incorporation. No such larger percentage is applicable to any of the items we are asking you to vote on at the Annual Meeting. Because abstentionsbroker non-votes are not actual votes with respect to a proposal, they will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on aany proposal.

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that, in an uncontested election of directors, the Board expects any incumbent director nominee who does not receive a “FOR” vote by a majority of shares present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote and actually voting on the matter to promptly tender his or her resignation to the Governance Committee, subject to acceptance by our Board. The Governance Committee will then make a recommendation to the Board with respect to the director nominee’s resignation and the Board will consider the recommendation and take appropriate action within 120 days from the date of the certification of the election results.

What happens if I do not specify a choice for a proposal when returning a proxy or do not cast my vote?

You should specify your choice for each proposal on your proxy card or voting instruction form. Shares represented by proxies will be voted in accordance with the instructions given by the stockholders.

If you are a stockholder of record and your proxy card is signed and returned without voting instructions, it will be voted according to the recommendations of our Board. If you do not return your proxy card or cast your vote, no votes will be cast on your behalf on any of the items of business at the Annual Meeting.

If you are the beneficial owner, but not the holder of record, of shares and fail to provide voting instructions, your broker or other holder of record is permitted to vote your shares on the ratification of Deloitte as our independent registered public

accounting firm. However, absent instructions from you, your broker or other holder of record may not vote on the election of directors, or the advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation or the approval of the 2014 LTIP, and no votes will be cast on your behalf for those matters.

Is my vote confidential?

All voted proxies and ballots will be handled in a manner intended to protect your voting privacy as a stockholder. Your vote will not be disclosed except:

 

to meet any legal requirements;

in limited circumstances such as a proxy contest in opposition to our Board of Directors;

 

to permit independent inspectors of election to tabulate and certify your vote; or

 

to adequately respond to your written comments on your proxy card.

ELECTIONELECTION OF DIRECTORS DIRECTORS

(ITEM 1)

Election Process.Our Articles of Incorporation provide that, at each annual meeting of stockholders, all directors shall be elected annually for a term expiring at the next succeeding annual meeting of stockholders or until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified. Accordingly, our Board has nominated the following eight persons for reelection as directors at this year’s Annual Meeting, for a term of one year: John F. Bookout, III, Roger A. Brown, Stephen G. Hanks, Stephen M. Johnson, D. Bradley McWilliams, Thomas C. Schievelbein,William H. Schumann, III, Mary L. Shafer-Malicki and David A. Trice. Additionally, our Board appointed Gary P. Luquette as a director on October 18, 2013 and David Dickson as a director on December 16, 2013, and has nominated each for election as a director at this year’s Annual Meeting, for a term of one year.

Our By-Laws provide that (1) a person shall not be nominated for election or reelection to our Board of Directors if such person shall have attained the age of 72 prior to the date of election or reelection, and (2) any director who attains the age of 72 during his or her term shall be deemed to have resigned and retired at the first Annual Meeting following his or her attainment of the age of 72. Accordingly, a director nominee may stand for election if he or she has

not attained the age of 72 prior to the date of election or reelection.

Unless otherwise directed, the persons named as proxies on the enclosed proxy card intend Pursuant to vote “FOR” the election of eachthese By-Law requirements, D. Bradley McWilliams, our Chairman of the nominees. If any nominee should become unavailableBoard of Directors and the Chairman of our Finance Committee, will retire from our Board after eleven years of service, effective at this year’s Annual Meeting. In connection therewith, we expect to elect a new Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chairman of the Finance Committee.

Director Qualifications. Our Governance Committee has determined that a candidate for election the shares will be voted for such substitute nominee as may be proposed byto our Board of Directors. However, we are Directors must meet specific minimum qualifications. Each candidate should:

have a record of integrity and ethics in his/her personal and professional life;

have a record of professional accomplishment in his/her field;

be prepared to represent the best interests of our stockholders;

not awarehave a material personal, financial or professional interest in any competitor of any circumstancesours; and

be prepared to participate fully in Board activities, including active membership on at least one Board committee and attendance at, and active participation in, meetings of the Board and the committee(s) of which he or she is a member, and not have other personal or professional commitments that would, preventin the Governance Committee’s sole judgment, interfere with or limit his or her ability to do so.

In addition, the Governance Committee also considers it desirable that candidates contribute positively to the collaborative culture among Board members and possess professional and personal experiences and expertise relevant to our business and industry.

While McDermott does not have a specific policy addressing board diversity, the Board recognizes the benefits of a diversified board and believes that any search for potential director candidates should consider diversity as to gender, ethnic background and personal and professional experiences. The Governance Committee solicits ideas for possible candidates from a number of sources — including independent director candidate search firms, members of the nomineesBoard and our senior level executives.

Director Nominations. Any stockholder may nominate one or more persons for election as one of our directors at an annual meeting of stockholders if the stockholder complies with the notice, information and consent provisions contained in our By-Laws. See “Stockholders’ Proposals” in this proxy statement and our By-Laws, which may be found on our Web site atwww.mcdermott.comat “About Us — Leadership & Corporate Governance — Corporate Governance.”

The Governance Committee will consider candidates identified through the processes described above and will evaluate each of them, including incumbents, based on the same criteria. The Governance Committee also takes into account the contributions of incumbent directors as Board members and the benefits to us arising from serving.their experience on the Board. Although the Governance Committee will consider candidates identified by stockholders, the Governance Committee has sole discretion whether to recommend those candidates to the Board.

In 2013, our Governance Committee engaged Russell Reynolds Associates (“Russell Reynolds”), an independent director search firm, in order to assist in selecting director candidates. After review and consideration of prospective candidates identified by Russell Reynolds, Mr. Luquette was appointed to the Board on October 18, 2013 in consideration of his extensive experience in the oil and gas industry, knowledge of our customers and other qualifications.

2014 Nominees.In nominating individuals to become members of the Board of Directors, the Governance Committee considers the experience, qualifications and skills of each potential member. Each nominee brings a strong and unique background and set of skills to the Board, giving the Board as a whole competence and experience in a wide variety of areas. The Governance Committee and the Board of Directors considered the following information, including the specific experience, qualifications, attributes or skills, in concluding each individual was an appropriate nominee to serve as a member of our Board for the term commencing at this year’s Annual Meeting (ages are as of May 10, 2012)6, 2014).

Unless otherwise directed, the persons named as proxies on the enclosed proxy card intend to vote “FOR” the election of each of the nominees. If any nominee should become unavailable for election, the shares will be voted for such substitute nominee as may be proposed by our Board of Directors. However, we are not aware of any circumstances that would prevent any of the nominees from serving.

Our Board recommends that stockholders vote “FOR” each of the nomineesfollowing named below.nominees.

 

John F. Bookout, III

 

Director Since 2006 

Finance Committee Member

Governance Committee Member

Mr. Bookout, 60, has served as a Managing Director of Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co., a private equity firm, since March 2008. Previously, he served as Senior Advisor to First Reserve Corporation, a private equity firm specializing in the energy industry, from 2006 to March 2008. Until 2006, he was a director of McKinsey & Company, a global management consulting firm, which he joined in 1978. Mr. Bookout previously served as a director of Tesoro Corporation from 2006-2010. The Board of Directors is nominating Mr. Bookout in consideration of his:

•       global experience with the petroleum refining and marketing industry and oil and gas exploration and development industry;

•       expertise in private equity and finance; and

•       experience as a board member of public companies.

 

John F. Bookout, III

Roger A. Brown

  

Director Since 20062005 

Governance Committee Chairman

Compensation Committee Member

From 2005 until his retirement in 2007, Mr. Brown, 69, was Vice President, Strategic Initiatives of Smith International, Inc., a supplier of goods and services to the oil and gas exploration and production industry, the petrochemical industry and other industrial markets. Mr. Brown was President of Smith Technologies (a business unit of Smith International, Inc.) from 1998 until 2005. Mr. Brown has also served as a director of Ultra Petroleum Corp. since 2007 and Boart Longyear Limited since 2010. The Board of Directors is nominating Mr. Brown in consideration of his:

•       executive leadership experience in the oil and gas exploration and production industry;

•       knowledge of corporate governance issues; and

•       experience as a board member of public companies.

Age — 58

Finance Committee — Member

Governance Committee — Member

Mr. Bookout has served as a Managing Director of Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co., a private equity firm, since March 2008. Previously, he served as Senior Advisor to First Reserve Corporation, a private equity firm specializing in the energy industry, from 2006 to March 2008. Until 2006, he was a director of McKinsey & Company, a global management consulting firm, which he joined in 1978. Mr. Bookout previously served as a director of Tesoro Corporation from 2006-2010. The Board of Directors is nominating Mr. Bookout in consideration of his:

global experience with the petroleum refining and marketing industry and oil and gas exploration and development industry;

expertise in private equity and finance; and

experience as a board member of public companies, including McDermott.

 

Roger A. Brown

David Dickson

  

Director Since 20052013 

President and Chief Executive Officer

Mr. Dickson, 46, has served as a member of our Board of Directors and as President and Chief Executive Officer since December 2013, prior to which he served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from October 2013. Mr. Dickson has over 23 years of offshore oilfield engineering and construction business experience, including 11 years of experience with Technip S.A. and its subsidiaries. From September 2008 to October 2013, he served as President of Technip U.S.A. Inc., with oversight responsibilities for all of Technip’s North American operations. In addition to being the President of Technip U.S.A. Inc., Mr. Dickson also had responsibility for certain operations in Latin America, including Mexico, Venezuela, Colombia and the Caribbean. Mr. Dickson also supported the Technip organization by managing key customer accounts with international oil companies based in the United States. The Board of Directors is nominating Mr. Dickson in consideration of his:

•       position as our President and Chief Executive Officer;

•       executive leadership experience in and significant knowledge of the offshore oilfield engineering and construction business; and

•       broad knowledge of the expectations of our core customers.

Age — 67

Compensation Committee — Member

Governance Committee — Chairman

From 2005 until his retirement in 2007, Mr. Brown was Vice President, Strategic Initiatives of Smith International, Inc., a supplier of goods and services to the oil and gas exploration and production industry, the petrochemical industry and other industrial markets. Mr. Brown was President of Smith Technologies (a business unit of Smith International, Inc.) from 1998 until 2005. Mr. Brown has also served as a director of Ultra Petroleum Corp. since 2007 and Boart Longyear Limited since 2010. The Board of Directors is nominating Mr. Brown in consideration of his:

executive leadership experience in the oil and gas exploration and production industry;

knowledge of corporate governance issues; and

experience as a board member of public companies, including McDermott.

Stephen G. Hanks

  

Director Since 2009

Audit Committee Member

Finance Committee Member

Mr. Hanks, 63, served in various roles over a 30-year career with Washington Group International, Inc. (and its predecessor, Morrison Knudsen Corporation), an integrated construction and management services company, and from 2000 through 2007 served as President, Chief Executive Officer and a member of its board of directors. Mr. Hanks has also served as a director of Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. since 2006 and as a director of The Babcock & Wilcox Company since 2010. The Board of Directors is nominating Mr. Hanks in consideration of his:

•       experience in executive leadership, including his position as the Chief Executive Officer of Washington Group;

•       background and knowledge in the areas of accounting, auditing and financial reporting, having previously served as a Chief Financial Officer;

•       experience in the engineering and construction industry; and

•       experience as a board member of public companies.

Age — 61

Audit Committee — Member

Finance Committee — Member

From November 2007 until his retirement in January 2008, Mr. Hanks was President of the Washington Division of URS Corporation, an engineering, construction and technical services company, and he also served as a member of URS Corporation’s Board of Directors during that time. Previously, from June 2001 to November 2007 he was President and CEO of Washington Group International, Inc. (“Washington Group”), an integrated engineering, construction and management services company which was acquired by URS Corporation in 2007, and also served on its Board of Directors. Mr. Hanks has also served as a director of Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. since 2006 and as a director of The Babcock & Wilcox Company since 2010. The Board of Directors is nominating Mr. Hanks in consideration of his:

experience in executive leadership, including his position as the Chief Executive Officer of Washington Group;

background and knowledge in the areas of accounting, auditing and financial reporting, having previously served as a Chief Financial Officer;

experience in the engineering and construction industry; and

experience as a board member of public companies, including McDermott.

 

Stephen M. Johnson

Gary P. Luquette

  

Director Since 20102013 

Age — 60

Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer

Mr. Johnson has been President and Chief Executive Officer of McDermott and a member of our Board since July 2010, and has served as Chairman of our Board since May 2011. Previously, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of J. Ray McDermott, S.A., one of our subsidiaries, from January 2010 to July 2010, and President and Chief Operating Officer of McDermott from April 2009 to December 2009. From 2001 to 2008, Mr. Johnson was Senior Executive Vice President and Member, Office of the Chairman, at Washington Group and at URS Corporation, which acquired Washington Group in 2007. The Board of Directors is nominating Mr. Johnson in consideration of his:

position as our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer;

experience in executive leadership for public companies in the engineering and construction industry, encompassing global experience, technical knowledge and complex business and financial structuring, as well as experience in the oil & gas, chemical processing, power generation, transportation, mining and government businesses;

operational and financial expertise in the engineering and construction industry, both in the United States and in international markets, including having resided, worked or led complex business transactions in the United States, Europe, Africa, the Middle East and Asia Pacific regions;

experience as a recognized leader in the area of risk management within the engineering and construction industry, having participated in the founding of the Engineering & Construction Risk Institute, a global organization focused on developing best practices in risk management, of which he served as Chairman; and

broad knowledge of the demands and expectations of our core customers.

D. Bradley McWilliams

Compensation Committee Member

Finance Committee Member

  Director Since 2003

From 2006 until his retirement in September 2013, Mr. Luquette, 58, served as President, Chevron North America Exploration and Production, a unit of Chevron Corporation. Previously, he held key exploration and production positions with Chevron in Europe, California, Indonesia and Louisiana. Mr. Luquette currently serves as a director of Frank’s International N.V. since November 2013. The Board of Directors is nominating Mr. Luquette in consideration of his:

•       experience in the upstream energy and supporting infrastructure businesses;

•       knowledge of and experience with our core customers;

•       significant international experience, having executive or management experience in Europe and Asia Pacific; and

•       experience as a board member of public companies.

Age — 70

Lead Director

Audit Committee — Member

Finance Committee — Chairman

Mr. McWilliams has served as our Lead Director since May 2011. From April 1995 until his retirement in April 2003, Mr. McWilliams was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Cooper Industries Ltd., a worldwide manufacturer of electrical products, tools and hardware. He was Vice President of Cooper Industries from 1982 until April 1995. Mr. McWilliams has served as a director and Lead Director of The Babcock & Wilcox Company since 2010 and previously served as a director of Kronos Incorporated from 1993 to 2005. The Board of Directors is nominating Mr. McWilliams in consideration of his:

background in public accounting;

background and knowledge in the areas of accounting, auditing and financial reporting, having served as a Chief Financial Officer of a public company; and

experience as a board member and lead director of public companies, including McDermott.

 

Thomas C. Schievelbein

William H. Schumann, III

  

Director Since 20042012 

Audit Committee Member

Governance Committee Member

From February 2007 until August 2012, Mr. Schumann, 63, served as Executive Vice President of FMC Technologies, Inc. (“FMC”), a global provider of technology solutions for the energy industry. Mr. Schumann previously served in the following capacities at FMC Technologies and its predecessor, FMC Corporation: Chief Financial Officer from 2001 until his retirement from that position in December 2011; Vice President, Corporate Development from 1998 to 1999; Vice President and General Manager, Agricultural Products Group from 1995 to 1998; Regional Director, North America Operations, Agricultural Products Group from 1993 to 1995; Executive Director of Corporate Development from 1991 to 1993, and other various management positions from the time he joined FMC in 1981. Mr. Schumann currently serves as Chairman of the Board of Avnet, Inc., which board he has served on since February 2010, on the board of directors of AMCOL International Corporation since August 2012 and on the board of directors of URS Corporation since March 2014. He also previously served on the board of directors of UAP Holding Corp. from 2005 to 2008. The Board of Directors is nominating Mr. Schumann in consideration of his:

•       executive leadership experience in the energy industry;

•       background and knowledge in the areas of accounting, auditing and financial reporting, having served as a Chief Financial Officer of a public company; and

•       experience as a board member of public companies, including as a chairman of a public company.

Age — 58

Compensation Committee — Chairman

Governance Committee — Member

Mr. Schievelbein has served as interim President and Chief Executive Officer of The Brinks Company, a secure transportation, cash handling and security-related services company, since December 2011. Previously, Mr. Schievelbein served as President of Northrop Grumman Newport News, a subsidiary of the Northrop Grumman Corporation, a global defense company, from November 2001 until his retirement in November 2004; and as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Newport News Shipbuilding, Inc. from October 1995 to October 2001. Mr. Schievelbein has also served as a director of Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. since 2011, The Brinks Company since 2009, including as interim Chairman of the Board from November to December 2011, and New York Life Insurance Company since 2006. The Board of Directors is nominating Mr. Schievelbein in consideration of his:

operational, business technology development and risk mitigation and control experience gained through executive leadership;

experience with the oversight of compensation strategies and plans; and

experience as a board member of public companies, including McDermott.

Mary L. Shafer-Malicki

  

Director Since 2011

Compensation Committee Chairman

Finance Committee Member

From July 2007 until her retirement in March 2009, Ms. Shafer-Malicki, 53, was Senior Vice President and Chief Executive Officer of BP Angola, a subsidiary of BP p.l.c., an oil and natural gas exploration, production, refining and marketing company. Previously, Ms. Shafer-Malicki served as Chief Operating Officer of BP Angola from January 2006 to June 2007 and in various other international engineering and managerial positions with BP p.l.c. Ms. Shafer-Malicki has also served as a director of Ausenco Limited since January 2011 and John Wood Group PLC since June 2012. The Board of Directors is nominating Ms. Shafer-Malicki in consideration of her:

•       experience in the upstream energy and supporting infrastructure businesses;

•       knowledge of and experience with our core customers;

•       executive experience and business leadership skills, including operations, strategy, commercial, safety and supply chain management;

•       significant international experience, having executive or management experience in Europe, Asia Pacific and Africa; and

•       experience as a board member of public companies.

Age — 51

Compensation Committee — Member

Finance Committee — Member

From July 2007 until her retirement in March 2009, Ms. Shafer-Malicki was Senior Vice President and Chief Executive Officer of BP Angola, a subsidiary of BP p.l.c., an oil and natural gas exploration, production, refining and marketing company. Previously, Ms. Shafer-Malicki served as Chief Operating Officer of BP Angola from January 2006 to June 2007; and various other international engineering and managerial positions with BP p.l.c. Ms. Shafer-Malicki has also served as a director of Ausenco Limited since January 2011. The Board of Directors is nominating Ms. Shafer-Malicki in consideration of her:

experience in the upstream energy and supporting infrastructure businesses;

knowledge of and experience with our core customers;

executive experience and business leadership skills, including operations, strategy, commercial, safety and supply chain management; and

significant international experience, having executive or management experience in Europe, Asia Pacific and Africa.

 

David A. Trice

  

Director Since 2009

Audit Committee Chairman

Compensation Committee Member

From February 2000 until his retirement in May 2009, Mr. Trice, 66, was Chief Executive Officer of Newfield Exploration Company, an oil and natural gas exploration and production company, and served as Chairman of its board from September 2004 to May 2010. Mr. Trice has served as a director of New Jersey Resources Corporation since 2004 and QEP Resources, Inc. since 2011. Mr. Trice previously served as a director of Grant PrideCo, Inc. from 2003 to 2008 and Hornbeck Offshore Services, Inc. from 2002 to 2011. The Board of Directors is nominating Mr. Trice in consideration of his:

•       executive experience as a Chief Executive Officer of a public company;

•       experience in the oil and gas exploration and production business;

•       background and knowledge in the areas of accounting, auditing and financial reporting; and

•       experience as a board member of public companies, including as a chairman of a public company.

Age — 64

Audit Committee — Chairman

Compensation Committee — Member

From February 2000 until his retirement in May 2009, Mr. Trice was Chief Executive Officer of Newfield Exploration Company, an oil and natural gas exploration and production company, and served as Chairman of its board from September 2004 to May 2010. Mr. Trice has served as a director of New Jersey Resources Corporation since 2004 and QEP Resources, Inc. since 2011. Mr. Trice previously served as a director of Grant PrideCo, Inc. from 2003 to 2008 and Hornbeck Offshore Services, Inc. from 2002 to 2011. The Board of Directors is nominating Mr. Trice in consideration of his:

executive experience as a Chief Executive Officer of a public company;

experience in the oil and gas exploration and production business;

background and knowledge in the areas of accounting, auditing and financial reporting; and

experience as a board member of public companies, including as a chairman of a public company.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCECORPORATE GOVERNANCE

We maintain a corporate governance section on our Web site which contains copies of our principal governance documents. The corporate governance section may be found atwww.mcdermott.comatunder “About Us — Leadership & Corporate Governance — Corporate Governance” and “About Us — Leadership & Corporate Governance — Board Committees.” The corporate governance section contains the following documents:

By-Laws

Corporate Governance Guidelines

Code of Ethics for CEO and Senior Financial Officers

Board of Directors Conflicts of Interest Policies and Procedures

Audit Committee Charter

Compensation Committee Charter

Finance Committee Charter

Governance Committee Charter

In addition, our Code of Business Conduct may be found on our Web site atwww.mcdermott.com at “About Us — Leadership & Corporate Governance.”

Director Independence

The New York Stock Exchange listing standards require our Board of Directors to be comprised of at least a majority of independent directors. For a director to be considered independent, our Board must determine that the director does not have any direct or indirect material relationship with us. To assist it in determining director independence, and as permitted by New York Stock ExchangeNYSE rules then in effect, the Board previously established categorical standards which conform to, or are more exacting than, the independence requirements in the New York Stock ExchangeNYSE listing standards. These standards are contained in theour Corporate Governance Guidelines, which can be found on our Web site atwww.mcdermott.comunder “About Us — Leadership & Corporate Governance — Corporate Governance.”

Based on these independence standards, our Board of Directors has affirmatively determined that the following directors are independent and meet our categorical independence standards:

 

John F. Bookout, III

  Thomas C. Schievelbein

D. Bradley McWilliams

Roger A. Brown

  Mary L. Shafer-Malicki

William H. Schumann, III

Stephen G. Hanks

  

Mary L. Shafer-Malicki

Gary P. Luquette

David A. Trice

D. Bradley McWilliams

In addition, our Board also determined, prior to his retirement in May 2011, that Mr. Ronald C. Cambre was independent and met our categorical standards.

In determining the independence of the directors, our Board considered ordinary course transactions between us and other entities with which the directors are associated, none of which were determined to constitute a material relationship with us. Messrs. Brown, SchievelbeinLuquette, Schumann and Trice have no relationship with McDermott, except as a director and stockholder. Mr.Messrs. Bookout and Hanks and Ms. Shafer-Malicki are directors of entities with which we transact business in the ordinary course. Mr. Bookout is an outside consultantManaging Director for an affiliate of an entitya private equity firm which has invested in entities with which we transact business in the ordinary course. Messrs. Hanks and McWilliams are directors of The Babcock & Wilcox Company (“B&W”), which pursuant to the transition services agreements entered into by McDermott and B&W prior to the spin-off of B&W (the “Spin-off”), McDermott has transacted with following the Spin-off. Our Board also considered unsolicited contributions by us to charitable organizations with which the directors were associated. Additionally, noassociated, including one in 2013 to a charitable organization for which Mr. McWilliams serves as a director. No director is related to any executive or significant shareholderstockholder of McDermott, nor is any director, with the exception of Mr. Johnson,Dickson, a current or former employee of McDermott.

Executive Sessions

Our independent directors meet in executive session without management on a regular basis. Currently, Mr. D. Bradley McWilliams, our Lead Director,Chairman of the Board of Directors, serves as the presiding director for thesethose executive sessions.

Communications with the Board

Stockholders or other interested persons may send written communications to the independent members of our Board, addressed to Board of Directors (independent members), c/o McDermott International, Inc., Corporate Secretary’s Office, 757 N. Eldridge Pkwy., Houston, Texas 77079. Information regarding this process is posted on our Web site atwww.mcdermott.comunder “About Us — Leadership & Corporate Governance — Independent Director Access Information.”

Board of Directors and Its Committees

Our Board met ninetwelve (12) times during 2011.2013. All directors attended 75% or more of the meetings of the Board and of the committees on which they served during 2011.2013. In addition, as reflected in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, we have adopted a policy that each member of our Board must make reasonable efforts to attend our Annual Meeting. All directors then serving on the Board attended our 20112013 Annual Meeting, with the exception of Ms. Shafer-Malicki, who was unable to attend due to a pre-existing conflict prior to joining our Board in February 2011.Meeting.

Board Leadership StructureStructure.

Commencing on May 6, 2011, Mr. JohnsonMcWilliams has served as Chairman of the Board in addition to his service as Chief Executive Officer. Prior to that date,since Mr. Cambre served as Chairman of the Board. In connection with Mr. Cambre’s retirement,Stephen M. Johnson, our Board reevaluated whether the positions of Chairman of the Boardformer President and Chief Executive Officer, should be separate or occupied by the same individual,retired from that position and determinedas a member of our Board of Directors on December 31, 2013. Our Board believes that this is an appropriate structure for McDermott at this time, as it allows Mr. Johnson should serve as Chairman of the Board in addition toDickson, who was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer. As the individual with primary responsibility for managingOfficer on December 16, 2013, to set our strategic direction and manage our day-to-day operations and performance, while Mr. Johnson is most familiar with our business and the complex challenges faced by McDermott. As a result, we believe that he is best positioned at this time to identify strategic priorities and lead Board discussions and decision-making processes regarding key business and strategic issues, as well as to oversee the execution of important strategic initiatives. As Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Johnson is in an optimal position to facilitate the flow of information between management and the Board andMcWilliams is able to ensure that McDermott presents its messageset the Board’s agendas and strategy to stockholders, employees, customers and other stakeholders with a unified voice.

McDermott has adopted a governance structure that includes:

a designated independent Lead Director;

a Board composed entirely of independent directors, with the exception of Mr. Johnson;

annual election of directors; and

committees composed entirely of independent directors.

The independent Lead Director, Mr. McWilliams, acts as an intermediary betweenlead the Board and management and is responsible for presiding at executive sessions of the independent directors and serving as a liaison on Board-wide issues between the independent directors and the Chief Executive Officer, as needed.meetings.

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

As part of its oversight function, the Board is actively involved in overseeing risk management through our Enterprise Risk Management (“ERM”) program. Our Chief Risk Officer administers our ERM program, and presents to senior management and the Board on matters relating to risk management on at least an annual basis. In connection with the ERM program, the Board exercises its oversight responsibility with respect to key external, strategic, operational and financial risks and discusses the effectiveness of current efforts to mitigate certain focus risks as identified by senior management and the Board through anonymous risk surveys.

Although the Board is ultimately responsible for risk oversight, the Board has delegated risk oversight responsibility to the Audit, Compensation, Finance and Governance Committees for each committee’s areas of oversight, as set forth in their respective charters. Each committee oversees risks, including but not limited to, those set forth below, and periodically reports to the Board on those risks:

the Audit Committee oversees risks with respect to financial reports and other financial information provided by us to our stockholders;

the Compensation Committee oversees risks with respect to our compensation policies and practices with respect to executives and directors as well as employees generally, employee benefit plans and the administration of equity plans;

the Finance Committee oversees risks with respect to our policies and processes relating to capital structure, capital expenditures, financing, mergers and acquisitions and capital expenditures; and

the Governance Committee oversees risks with respect to the review and recommendation of Board member candidates, the annual evaluation of the performance of the Board and its members, review of compensation for our nonemployee directors and director and officer insurance coverage.

At their respective August 2011 meetings, each committee undertook an in-depth assessment of those areas of risk oversight that were delegated to it, and provided a report to the Board. Also, at its August 2011 meeting, the Board received an ERM report from the Chief Risk Officer, and performed an

assessment and review of the risks described in that report that were not delegated to the committees.

Board CommitteesCommittees.

Our Board currently has, and appoints the members of, standing Audit, Compensation, Finance and Governance Committees. Each of those committees is comprised entirely of independent nonemployee directors and has a written charter approved by the Board. The current charter for each standing Board committee is posted on our Web site atwww.mcdermott.comunder “About Us — Leadership & Corporate Governance — Board Committees.” Attendance at committee meetings is open to every director, regardless of whether he/he or she is a member of the committee. The following table shows the current membership, the principal functions and the number of meetings held in 20112013 for each committee:

 

Committees and

Current Members

Committee
 Principal Functions and Additional Information
Meetings
Held in 2011

AUDIT

 

Committee Members:

Mr. Trice (Chair)

Mr. Hanks

Mr. McWilliams

Mr. Schumann

4 Meetings Held in 2013

 

•    Serves as an independent and objective party to monitorMonitors our financial reporting process and internal control system.

•    Oversees the integrity of our financial statements.

•    Monitors our compliance with legal and regulatory financial requirements, including our compliance with the applicable reporting requirements established by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

•    Evaluates the independence, qualifications, performance and compensation of our independent registered public accounting firm.

•    Oversees the performance of our internal audit function.

•    Oversees certain aspects of our Compliance and Ethics Program relating to financial matters, books and records and accounting and as required by applicable statutes, rules and regulations.

•    Provides an open avenue of communication among our independent registered public accounting firm, financial and senior management, the internal audit department and the Board.

 

Our Board has determined that Messrs. Trice, Hanks, McWilliams and McWilliamsSchumann each qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” within the definition established by the SEC. For more information on the backgrounds of those directors, see their biographical information under “Election of Directors” above.

 

7 Meetings

in 2011

 

COMPENSATION

 

Mr. SchievelbeinCommittee Members:

Ms. Shafer-Malicki (Chair)

Mr. Brown

Ms. Shafer-MalickiMr. Luquette

Mr. Trice

10 Meetings Held in 2013

 

•    Evaluates our officer and director compensation plans, policies and programs and our employee benefit plans.

•    Approves and/or recommends to the Board for approval such officer and director compensation plans, policies and programs.

•    Oversees our disclosures relating to compensation plans, policies and programs, including overseeing the preparation of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this proxy statement.

•    Acts in its sole discretion to retain or terminate any compensation consultant to be used to assist the Compensation Committee in the discharge of its responsibilities. For additional information on the role of compensation consultants, please see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Role of Compensation Committee, Compensation Consultant and Management” below.

•    For 2011,2013, the Compensation Committee authorized our Chief Executive Officer, in consultation with his direct reports, to establish individual goals under our Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (“EICP”), for our other executive officers who participate in the EICP. All payments under the EICP are subject to Compensation Committee approval.

•    Under both our 2001 Directors and Officers Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2001 D&O Plan”) and ourthe 2009 McDermott International, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2009 LTIP”), ourLTIP, the Compensation Committee may delegate some of its duties to our Chief Executive Officer or other senior officers.

•    Under ourthe McDermott International, Inc. Director and Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, which we refer to as the “Deferred Compensation Plan,“DCP,” the Compensation Committee may delegate any of its powers or responsibilities to one or more members of the Committee or any other person or entity.

 

7 Meetings

in 2011

 

FINANCE

 

Committee Members:

Mr. McWilliams (Chair)

Mr. Bookout

Mr. Hanks

Mr. Luquette

Ms. Shafer-Malicki

6 Meetings Held in 2013

 

•    Reviews and oversees financial policies and strategies, mergers and acquisitions, financings, liabilities, investment performance of our pension plans and our capital structure.

•    Recommends any change in dividend policies or stock repurchase programs.

•    Oversees capital expenditures and capital allocation strategies.

•    Oversees our tax structure and monitors any developments relating to changes in tax legislation.

•    Generally has responsibility over such matters up to $50 million, and for activities involving amounts over $50 million, reviews theeach such activity and makes a recommendation to the Board.

 

5 Meetings

in 2011

 

GOVERNANCE

 

Committee Members:

Mr. Brown (Chair)

Mr. Bookout

Mr. SchievelbeinSchumann

6 Meetings Held in 2013

 

•    Reviews and assesses the succession plan for the Chief Executive Officer and other members of executive management and reviews such plan with the Board periodically, and at least on an annual basis.

•    Identifies individuals qualified to become Board members and recommends to the Board each year the director nominees for the next annual meeting of stockholders.

•    Develops, reviews and recommends to the Board any changes to our Corporate Governance Guidelines the Governance Committee deems appropriate to our Corporate Governance Guidelines.appropriate.

•    Leads the Board in its annual review of the Board’s performance and, in conjunction with the Compensation Committee, oversees the annual evaluation of our Chief Executive Officer.

•    Reviews our executive management succession plan on at least an annual basis.

•    Recommends to the Board the directors to serve on each Board committee.

•    Recommends to the Board the compensation of nonemployee directors.

•    Serves as the primary committee overseeing our Compliance and Ethics Program, excluding certain oversight responsibilities assigned to the Audit Committee.

•    Oversees our director and officer insurance program.

The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

As part of its oversight function, the Board is actively involved in overseeing risk management through our Enterprise Risk Management (“ERM”) program. Our Chief Risk Officer administers our ERM program and presents to senior management and the Board on matters relating to risk management on at least an annual basis. In connection with the ERM program, the Board exercises its oversight responsibility with respect to key external, strategic, operational and financial risks and discusses the effectiveness of current efforts to mitigate certain focus risks as identified by senior management and the Board through anonymous risk surveys.

Board Committees. Although the Board is ultimately responsible for risk oversight, the Board is assisted in discharging its risk oversight responsibility by the Audit, Compensation, Finance and Governance Committees. Each committee oversees management of risks, including, but not limited to, the areas of risk summarized below, and periodically reports to the Board on those areas of risk:

CommitteeRisk Oversight

Audit

 

•    Oversees management of risks related to our financial statements and the financial reporting process

Compensation

•    Oversees management of risks related to our compensation policies and practices applicable to executives as well as employees generally, employee benefit plans and the administration of equity plans

Finance

•    Oversees management of risks with respect to our policies and processes regarding capital structure, capital expenditures, financing and mergers and acquisitions

Governance

•    Oversees management of risks related to the review and recommendation of Board member candidates, the annual evaluation of the performance of the Board and its members, review of compensation for our nonemployee directors, succession planning for the Chief Executive Officer and other members of executive management, our Compliance and Ethics Program (excluding responsibilities assigned to the Audit Committee) and director and officer insurance coverage

6 Meetings

in 2011

At their respective November 2013 meetings, each committee undertook an in-depth assessment of those areas of risk oversight that were delegated to it and provided a report to the Board. Also, at its November 2013 meeting, the Board received an ERM report from the Chief Risk Officer and performed an assessment and review of the risks described in that report that were not delegated to the committees.

Compensation Policies and Practices and Risk

The Compensation Committee has concluded that risks arising from McDermott’s compensation policies and practices for McDermott employees are not reasonably likely to have a materially adverse effect on McDermott. In reaching this conclusion, the Compensation Committee considered the policies and practices in the following paragraph.

The Compensation Committee regularly reviews the design of our significant compensation programs with the assistance of its compensation consultant. We believe our compensation programs motivate and retain our executive officer employeesofficers while allowing for appropriate levels of business risk through some of the following features:

 

  

Reasonable Compensation Programs — Using the elements of total direct compensation, the Compensation Committee seeks to provide compensation opportunities for employees targeted at or near the median compensation of comparable positions in our market. As a result, we believe the total direct compensation of executive officer employees provides a reasonable and appropriate mix of cash and equity, annual and longer-term incentives and performance metrics.

  

EmphasizeEmphasis on Long-Term Incentive Compensation Over Annual IncentiveCompensation — Long-term incentive compensation typically makes up a larger percentage of an executive officer employee’sofficer’s total direct compensation than annual incentive compensation. Incentive compensation helps drive performance and align the interests of thoseour employees with those of stockholders. In addition, tying a significant portion of an employee’s total direct compensation to long-term incentives (which typically vest over a period of three or more years) helps to promote longer-term perspectives regarding our company’s performance.

 

  

Clawback Policy — The Compensation Committee has adopted a policy under whichthat allows McDermott shall seek to recover, any incentive-based award grantedunder certain circumstances, compensation paid to any executive officer as required by the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act or any other “clawback” provision required by law or the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange.officers.

 

  

Long-Term Incentive Compensation Subject to Forfeiture — The Compensation Committee may terminate any outstanding

stock award if the recipient, while employed by McDermott or performing services on behalf of McDermott under any consulting agreement: (1) is convicted of a misdemeanor involving fraud, dishonesty or moral turpitude or a felony; or (2) engages in conduct that adversely affects or, in the sole judgment of the Compensation Committee, may reasonably be expected to adversely affect, the business reputation or economic interests of the Company.our company.

 

  

Annual Incentive Compensation Subject to Threshold Performance and Linear and Capped Payouts — The Compensation Committee establishes financial performance goals which are generally used to plot a linear payout formula for annual incentive compensation, eliminating payout “cliffs” between the established performance goals. Threshold levels of performance required to earn short-term incentives are tied to among other components, achievement of financial results that correlate to the Company’s weighted average cost of capital.our operating income. The maximum payout for the annual incentive compensation is capped at 200% of target.

 

  

Use of Multiple and Appropriate Performance Metrics — Utilizing diversified performance measures helps prevent compensation opportunities from being overly weighted toward the performance result of a single measure. In general, our incentive programs are historically based on a mix of financial and individual goals. In recent years our primary financial performance metric has been operating income. Compared to other financial metrics, operating income is a measure of the profitability of our business which helps drive accountability at our operating segments, thereby reducing risks related to incentive compensation by putting the focus on quality of revenues, not quantity. Additionally, commencing in 2011, the Compensation Committee utilized relative total shareholder return and return on invested capital as additional performance measures.

 

  

Stock Ownership Guidelines — Our executive officers and directors are subject to sharestock ownership guidelines, which also

helps help promote longer-term perspectives and align the interests of our executive officers and directors with those of our stockholders. In 2010, we increased the stock ownership requirements for both our executive officers and nonemployee directors to further emphasize this alignment of interests.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

All members of our Compensation Committee are independent in accordance with NYSE listing standards. No member of the Compensation Committee (1) was, during the year ended December 31, 2011,2013, or had previously been, an officer or employee of McDermott or any of its subsidiaries, or (2) had any material interest in a transaction of McDermott or a business relationship with, or any indebtedness to, McDermott. No interlocking relationship existed during the year ended December 31, 20112013 between any member of the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee and an executive officer of McDermott.

Director Nomination Process

Our Governance Committee has determined that a candidate for election to our Board of Directors must meet specific minimum qualifications. Each candidate should:

have a record of integrity and ethics in his/her personal and professional life;

have a record of professional accomplishment in his/her field;

be prepared to represent the best interests of our stockholders;

not have a material personal, financial or professional interest in any competitor of ours; and

be prepared to participate fully in Board activities, including active membership on at least one Board committee and attendance at, and active participation in, meetings of the Board and the committee(s) of which he or she is a member, and not have other personal or professional commitments that would, in the Governance Committee’s sole judgment, interfere with or limit his or her ability to do so.

In addition, the Governance Committee also considers it desirable that candidates possess the following qualities or skills:

each candidate should contribute positively to the collaborative culture among Board members; and

each candidate should possess professional and personal experiences and expertise relevant to our businesses and industries.

While McDermott does not have a specific policy addressing board diversity, the Board recognizes the benefits of a diversified board and believes that any search for potential director candidates should consider diversity as to gender, ethnic background and personal and professional experiences. The Governance Committee solicits ideas for possible candidates from a number of sources — including independent director candidate search firms, members of the Board and our senior level executives.

In 2010, our Governance Committee engaged Russell Reynolds Associates (“Russell Reynolds”), an independent director search firm, in order to assist in selecting director candidates. After review and consideration of approximately 25 prospective candidates identified by Russell Reynolds,

Ms. Shafer-Malicki was appointed to the Board on February 17, 2011 in consideration of her extensive experience in our industry and other qualifications.

Any stockholder may nominate one or more persons for election as one of our directors at an annual meeting of stockholders if the stockholder complies with the notice, information and consent provisions contained in our By-Laws. See “Stockholders’ Proposals” in this proxy statement and our By-Laws, which may be found on our Web site atwww.mcdermott.comat “About Us — Leadership & Corporate Governance — Corporate Governance.”

The Governance Committee will consider candidates identified through the processes described above and will evaluate each of them, including incumbents, based on the same criteria. The Governance Committee also takes into account the contributions of incumbent directors as Board members and the benefits to us arising from their experience on the Board. Although the Governance Committee will consider candidates identified by stockholders, the Governance Committee has sole discretion whether to recommend those candidates to the Board. None of the director nominees for the 2012 Annual Meeting are standing for election for the first time.

COMPENSATIONCOMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS DIRECTORS

In May 2011, at the request of the Governance Committee, Pay Governance LLC performed a market analysis of nonemployee director compensation and made recommendations regarding nonemployee director compensation to the Governance Committee. Based upon those recommendations, the Governance Committee recommended revisions toUnder our 20112013 nonemployee director compensation program, which were approved by the Board.

Beginning May 7, 2011, underwas generally consistent with our 2011 nonemployee director compensation program,programs for 2011 and 2012, cash compensation for nonemployee directors consisted of retainers (paid monthly and prorated for partial terms) and meeting fees as follows:

 

annual Board member retainer: $75,000;

 

additional retainer for the chair of each of the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee: $20,000;

 

additional retainer for the chair of each of the Finance Committee and Governance Committee: $10,000;

additional retainer for the Lead Director: $20,000; and

 

meeting fees of $2,500 for each meeting of the Board or a Committee (of which the nonemployee director is a member) attended, in person or by telephone, in excess of the eighth Board or Committee meeting per calendar year. Previously, meeting fees of $2,500 were paid for each Board meeting personally attended by a nonemployee director, $1,750 for each meeting of a Committee personally attended by a nonemployee director who was a member of the Committee, and $1,000 for each Board meeting and meeting of a Committee attended telephonically by a nonemployee director who was a member of the Board or Committee.

No changes were made under our 2011 nonemployee director compensation program with respect to equity awards.

The table below summarizes the compensation earned by or paid to our nonemployee directors during the year ended December 31, 2011.2013. Mr. Ronald C. Cambre, our former Chairman of the Board, retired fromGary P. Luquette was appointed to our Board effective May 6, 2011.October 18, 2013.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLEDIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE

 

Name  

Fees Earned or

Paid in Cash

   

Stock

Awards(1)

   Total 

John F. Bookout, III

  $74,500    $119,995    $194,495  

Roger A. Brown

  $85,417    $119,995    $205,412  

Ronald C. Cambre

  $65,750         $65,750  

Stephen G. Hanks

  $75,500    $119,995    $195,495  

D. Bradley McWilliams

  $98,000    $119,995    $217,995  

Thomas C. Schievelbein

  $93,333    $119,995    $213,328  

Mary L. Shafer-Malicki

  $69,250    $143,789    $213,039  

David A. Trice

  $95,583    $119,995    $215,578  

 

Name  Fees Earned or Paid in Cash  Stock Awards(1)  Total

John F. Bookout, III

  $82,500  $119,999  $202,499

Roger A. Brown

  $100,000  $119,999  $219,999

Stephen G. Hanks

  $87,500  $119,999  $207,499

Gary P. Luquette

  $15,218  $66,078  $81,296

D. Bradley McWilliams

  $115,000  $119,999  $234,999

William H. Schumann, III

  $85,000  $119,999  $204,999

Mary L. Shafer-Malicki

  $112,500  $119,999  $232,499

David A. Trice

  $110,000  $119,999  $229,999

 

 

(1)

Under our 20112013 director compensation program, equity compensation for nonemployee directors generally consisted of a discretionary annual stock grant. On May 13, 2011,2013, each of the nonemployee directors then serving as a director received a grant of 5,86213,001 shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units valued at $119,995, which were settled in 2011 in unrestricted shares of McDermott common stock. In addition$119,999. Because Mr. Luquette was not appointed to the annual stock grant, Ms. Shafer-Malickiour Board until October 18, 2013, he received a grant of 9288,683 shares of restricted stock on March 4, 2011October 18, 2013 valued at $23,794,$66,078, following herhis appointment to our Board, which reflected Ms. Shafer-Malicki’shis partial-year service and which were settled in unrestricted shares in 2011.service.

The amounts reported represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the restricted stock computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (“FASB ASC”) Topic 718, using the closing market price of McDermott common stock on the date of grant ($9.23 on May 13, 2013 and $7.61 on October 18, 2013). Under the terms of each award, the restricted stock vested immediately on the grant date and immediately became unrestricted shares of McDermott common stock.

The amounts reported represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the restricted stock or restricted stock units computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (“FASB ASC”) Topic 718, using the closing market price of McDermott common stock on the date of grant ($20.47 on May 13, 2011 and $25.64 on March 4, 2011). Under the terms of each award, the restricted stock and restricted stock units vested immediately on the grant date.

As of December 31, 2013, nonemployee directors had aggregate outstanding stock option awards as follows: Mr. Bookout — stock options to purchase 6,105 shares; Mr. Brown — stock options to purchase 38,085 shares; and Mr. McWilliams — stock options to purchase 900 shares. All of such stock options were fully vested.

As of December 31, 2011, the nonemployee directors had aggregate outstanding stock option awards as follows: Mr. Bookout — 6,105 stock options; Mr. Brown — 38,085 stock options; Mr. McWilliams — 37,876 stock options; and Mr. Schievelbein — 72,538 stock options.

NAMED EXECUTIVES PROFILESEXECUTIVE OFFICER PROFILES

The profiles below and on the following profilespages provide summary information regarding the experience and 20112013 compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer and two of our three other most highly compensated executive officers, who were employed by McDermott as of December 31, 2011,2013, whom we refer to as our “Continuing Named Executives.” The Continuing Named Executives and Mr. John T. Nesser, our former Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer, who would have been one of our three other most highly compensated executive officers had he been employed by McDermott as of December 31, 2011, are collectively referred to as our “Named Executives.” Information on Mr. Nesser is provided in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) and the

compensation-related tables included in this proxy statement.

Executives” or “Continuing NEOs”. The Continuing Named Executive profiles provide biographical information, including age and tenure with McDermott as of May 10, 2012,6, 2014, and summarize the compensation disclosures that are provided in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A&A”) and executive compensation tables in this proxy statement. These profiles are supplemental, and are being provided in addition to, and not in substitution for, the detailed compensation tables required by the SEC that follow the CD&A. Please consult the more detailed compensation tables and the accompanying footnotes following the CD&A for an explanation of how the compensation information is calculated. See the following pages for profiles of:

David Dickson, our President and Chief Executive Officer;

Perry L. Elders, our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer;

Scott V. Cummins, our Executive Vice President, Offshore; and

Liane K. Hinrichs, our Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary.

We have included below biographical information, including age as of May 6, 2014, for Messrs. Gary L. Carlson, our Senior Vice President and Chief Administration Officer, and Tony Duncan, our Executive Vice President, Subsea, who are also executive officers but are not NEOs under applicable SEC rules.

Gary L. Carlson, 59, has served as our Senior Vice President and Chief Administration Officer since February 2012. Previously, he served as: Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer from May 2011 to February 2012; Senior Vice President, Human Resources from July 2010 to May 2011; Senior Vice President, Human Resources and Organization Development for our subsidiary J. Ray McDermott, S.A. from March 2010 to July 2010; Senior Vice President, Human Resources of MWH Global, Inc., an energy and environmental engineering, construction and water resource management firm, from 2008 to 2010; and Vice President, Human Resources of KBR, Inc., an engineering, construction and services company, from 2004 to 2008.

Tony Duncan, 53, has served as our Executive Vice President, Subsea, since March 2014. Previously, he served as our Vice President and General Manager, Subsea, from April 2013 to March 2014, with responsibility for the Atlantic segment of McDermott’s business from January 2014 to March 2014; Vice President, Supply Chain Management of Subsea 7, S.A., a global subsea engineering, construction and services company, from March 2011 to March 2013; Regional Vice President — Gulf of Mexico of Acergy, S.A., an international subsea engineering construction and services company which merged with Subsea 7, Inc. in January 2011, from February 2006 to March 2011; and Vice President, SURF — Gulf of Mexico of Technip, S.A., from September 2001 to February 2006.

The Continuing Named Executives and Mr. Stephen M. Johnson, our former President and Chief Executive Officer (who retired in December 2013), Mr. John T. McCormack, our former Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer (who retired in October 2013), and Mr. Stewart A. Mitchell, our former Senior Vice President and General Manager, Middle East & Atlantic (who resigned in January 2014), are collectively referred to as our “Named Executives” or “NEOs.” Information relating to Messrs. Johnson, McCormack and Mitchell is provided in the CD&A and the compensation-related tables included in this proxy statement.

DAVID DICKSON

PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Age: 46

Tenure with McDermott: 6 months

Mr. Dickson, 46, has served as a member of our Board of Directors and as President and Chief Executive Officer since December 2013, prior to which he served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from October 2013. Mr. Dickson has over 23 years of offshore oilfield engineering and construction business experience, including 11 years of experience with Technip S.A. and its subsidiaries. From September 2008 to October 2013, he served as President of Technip U.S.A. Inc., with oversight responsibilities for all of Technip’s North American operations. In addition to being the President of Technip U.S.A. Inc., Mr. Dickson also had responsibility for certain operations in Latin America, including Mexico, Venezuela, Colombia and the Caribbean. Mr. Dickson also supported the Technip organization by managing key customer accounts with international oil companies based in the United States.

2013 COMPENSATION

Annual Base Salary

  

Base Salary Earned(1)

  $144,618  

Cash Signing Bonus(2)

  

Cash Signing Bonus

  $480,000  

Long-Term Incentive Compensation(2)

  

Restricted Stock Award

  $3,799,998  

Other Compensation

  

Deferred Compensation Plan Contribution

  $N/A  

Thrift Match

  $0  

Service-Based Thrift Contribution

  $4,339  

Tax Payments

  $0  

Perquisites

  $0  

EQUITY AWARDED IN 2013

October 31, 2013

Restricted Stock Award

537,482 shares

(1)

Base salary earned reflects partial year compensation for the period October 31, 2013 through December 31, 2013.

(2)

Mr. Dickson received a cash signing bonus and a one-time award of restricted stock to compensate him for benefits from his former employer that he forfeited. The restricted stock award is reflected using the grant date fair value of the award.

 

STEPHEN M. JOHNSONPERRY L. ELDERS

CHAIRMANOFTHE BOARDSENIOR VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Age: 52

Tenure with McDermott: 4 years

Mr. Elders has served as our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since July 2010, and served in that capacity at our subsidiary J. Ray McDermott, S.A. from April 2010 to July 2010. Previously, he served as: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from February 2006 to April 2009, and Senior Financial Advisor from November 2005 to February 2006, of Bristow Group, Inc., PRESIDENTAND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERa worldwide provider of helicopter services; Director, Financial Consulting of Sirius Solutions, an independent business consulting firm, from July 2005 to February 2006; and Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Vetco International, Ltd., a provider of upstream oil and gas production facilities, process systems, technology and products, from August 2004 to May 2005. Mr. Elders spent 20 years (1983-2003) in public accounting firms where he became an audit partner specializing in multi-national energy service companies. Mr. Elders is a Certified Public Accountant.

2013 COMPENSATION

Annual Base Salary

  

Base Salary Earned

  $511,250  

Annual Incentive Compensation

  

Executive Incentive Compensation Plan

  $0  

Long-Term Incentive Compensation(1)

  

Restricted Stock Units

  $274,974  

Stock Options

  $274,995  

Performance Shares

  $549,992  

Other Compensation

  

Deferred Compensation Plan Contribution

  $24,687  

Thrift Match

  $7,650  

Service-Based Thrift Contribution

  $7,650  

Tax Payments

  $0  

Perquisites

  $20,000  

 

EQUITY AWARDED IN 2013

 

Age: 60March 5, 2013

Tenure with McDermott: 3 years

Mr. Johnson has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer since July 2010. Previously, he served as: President and Chief Executive Officer of J. Ray McDermott, S.A., one of our subsidiaries, from January 2010 to July 2010 and our President and Chief Operating Officer from April 2009 to December 2009. From 2001 to 2008, Mr. Johnson was Senior Executive Vice President and Member, Office of the Chairman, at Washington Group International, Inc. (“Washington Group”) and at URS Corporation, which acquired Washington Group in 2007.

2011 COMPENSATION

Annual Base Salary

Base Salary Earned

$   942,500

Annual Incentive Compensation

Executive Incentive Compensation Plan

$              0

Long-Term Incentive Compensation(1)

 

Restricted Stock Units

  $   999,96026,188
    units

March 5, 2013

 

Stock Options

  $   944,08956,700
    shares

March 5, 2013

 

Performance Shares

  $2,382,132

Pension Plan(2)

Annual Change in Present Value of Accumulated Pension Benefit

N/A

Other Compensation

Deferred Compensation Plan Contribution

$     97,932

Thrift Match

$       6,817

Service-Based Thrift Contribution

$       7,350

Tax Gross-Ups

$              0

Perquisites

$     20,000

Other

$              0
51,935    

2011 TOTAL COMPENSATION

LOGO  

EQUITY AWARDEDIN 2011

March 4, 2011Restricted Stock Units39,000 units  
March 4, 2011Stock Options98,133 shares  
March 4, 2011Performance Shares56,529 shares

(1)   Each equity grant is disclosed at the grant date fair value of the award.

(2)   Mr. Johnson does not participate in our qualified defined benefit plan due to commencing his employment with the Company after the plan was closed to new participants in 2006.

PERRY L. ELDERS

SENIOR VICE PRESIDENTAND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

 

Age: 50

Tenure with McDermott: 2 years

Mr. Elders has served as our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since July 2010, and served in that capacity at our subsidiary J. Ray McDermott, S.A. from April 2010 to July 2010. Previously, he served as: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from February 2006 to April 2009, and Senior Financial Advisor from November 2005 to February 2006, of Bristow Group, Inc., a worldwide provider of helicopter services; Director, Financial Consulting of Sirius Solutions, an independent business consulting firm, from July 2005 to February 2006; and Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Vetco International, Ltd., a provider of upstream oil and gas production facilities, process systems, technology and products, from August 2004 to May 2005. Mr. Elders spent 20 years (1983-2003) in public accounting firms where he became an audit partner specializing in multi-national energy service companies. Mr. Elders is a Certified Public Accountant.

2011 COMPENSATION
(1)

Annual Base Salary

Base Salary Earned

$481,250

Annual Incentive Compensation

Executive Incentive Compensation Plan

$           0

Long-Term Incentive Compensation(1)

Restricted Stock Units

$249,990

Stock Options

$236,000

Performance Shares

$595,438

Pension Plan(2)

Annual Change in Present Value of Accumulated Pension Benefit

N/A

Other Compensation

Deferred Compensation Plan Contribution

$  39,950

Thrift Match

$    7,350

Service-Based Thrift Contribution

$    7,350

Tax Gross-Ups

$           0

Perquisites

$  20,000

Other

$    2,113

2011 TOTAL COMPENSATION

LOGO  

EQUITY AWARDEDIN 2011

March 4, 2011Restricted Stock Units  9,750 units  
March 4, 2011Stock Options24,531 shares
March 4, 2011Performance Shares14,130 shares

(1)   Each equity grant is disclosed at the grant date fair value of the award.

(2)   Mr. Elders does not participate in our qualified defined benefit plan due to commencing his employment with the Company after the plan was closed to new participants in 2006.

GARY L. CARLSON

SENIOR VICE PRESIDENTAND CHIEF ADMINISTRATION OFFICER

Age: 57

Tenure with McDermott: 2 years

Mr. Carlson has served as our Senior Vice President and Chief Administration Officer since February 2012. Previously, he served as: Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer from May 2011 to February 2012; Senior Vice President, Human Resources from July 2010 to May 2011; Senior Vice President, Human Resources and Organization Development for our subsidiary J. Ray McDermott, S.A. from March 2010 to July 2010; Senior Vice President, Human Resources of MWH Global, Inc., an energy and environmental engineering, construction and water resource management firm, from 2008 to 2010; and Vice President, Human Resources of KBR, Inc., an engineering, construction and services company, from 2004 to 2008.

2011 COMPENSATION

Annual Base Salary

Base Salary Earned

$332,000

Annual Incentive Compensation

Executive Incentive Compensation Plan

$           0

Long-Term Incentive Compensation(1)

Restricted Stock Units

$116,688

Stock Options

$  94,406

Performance Shares

$238,175

Pension Plan(2)

Annual Change in Present Value of Accumulated Pension Benefit

N/A

Other Compensation

Deferred Compensation Plan Contribution

$  24,800

Thrift Match

$    6,030

Service-Based Thrift Contribution

$    7,350

Tax Gross-Ups

$  11,720

Perquisites(3)

$  68,606

Other

$    2,113

2011 TOTAL COMPENSATION

LOGO  

EQUITY AWARDEDIN 2011

March 4, 2011Restricted Stock Units4,551 units  
March 4, 2011Stock Options9,813 shares
March 4, 2011Performance Shares5,652 shares

(1)   Each equity grant is disclosed at the grant date fair value of the award.

(2)   Mr. Carlson does not participate in our qualified defined benefit plan due to commencing his employment with the Company after the plan was closed to new participants in 2006.

(3)   The amount reported for Mr. Carlson includes $48,606 attributable to the cost of providing him relocation assistance in connection with his move from Colorado to Texas.

LIANE K. HINRICHS

SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, GENERAL COUNSELAND CORPORATE SECRETARY

Age: 54

Tenure with McDermott: 13 years

Ms. Hinrichs has been our Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary since October 2008. Previously, she served as our: Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary from January 2007 to September 2008; Corporate Secretary and Associate General Counsel, Corporate Compliance and Transactions from January 2006 to December 2006; Associate General Counsel, Corporate Compliance and Transactions, and Deputy Corporate Secretary from June 2004 to December 2005; Assistant General Counsel, Corporate Secretary and Transactions from October 2001 to May 2004; and Senior Counsel from May 1999 to September 2001. Prior to joining McDermott in 1999, she was a partner in a New Orleans law firm.

2011 COMPENSATION

Annual Base Salary

Base Salary Earned

$435,575

Annual Incentive Compensation

Executive Incentive Compensation Plan

$           0

Long-Term Incentive Compensation(1)

Restricted Stock Units

$256,759

Stock Options

$212,421

Performance Shares

$535,894

Pension Plan

Annual Change in Present Value of Accumulated Pension Benefit

$  76,760

Other Compensation

Deferred Compensation Plan Contribution

$  43,511

Thrift Match

$    6,689

Service-Based Thrift Contribution

$    7,350

Tax Gross-Ups

$           0

Perquisites

$  20,000

Other

$           0

2011 TOTAL COMPENSATION

LOGO  

EQUITY AWARDEDIN 2011

March 4, 2011Restricted Stock Units10,014 units  
March 4, 2011Stock Options22,080 shares
March 4, 2011Performance Shares12,717 shares

(1)   Each equity grant is disclosed at the grant date fair value of the award.

JOHN T. MCCORMACKSCOTT V. CUMMINS

EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT, CHIEF OPERATING OFFICEREXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT, OFFSHORE

 

Age: 51

Age: 65

Tenure with McDermott: 9Tenure with McDermott: 28 years

Mr. McCormack, 65, has served as our Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer since June 2011. Previously, he served as our Senior Vice President, Operations, from July 2010 to June 2011; Senior Vice President, Operations of our subsidiary J. Ray McDermott, S.A. from January 2006 to July 2010; Vice President of J. Ray McDermott, S.A. from May 2004 to January 2006; and Vice President, Project Services of J. Ray McDermott, S.A. since he joined McDermott in January 2003 to May 2004.

2011 COMPENSATION

Annual Base Salary

Base Salary Earned

$447,381

Annual Incentive Compensation

Executive Incentive Compensation Plan

$           0

Long-Term Incentive Compensation(1)

Restricted Stock Units

$281,173

Stock Options

$253,847

Performance Shares

$634,020

Pension Plan(2)

Change in Present Value of Accumulated Pension Benefit

N/A

Other Compensation

Deferred Compensation Plan Contribution

$  36,170

Thrift Match

$    7,350

Service-Based Thrift Contribution

$    7,350

Tax Gross-Ups

$           0

Perquisites

$  20,000

Other

$           0

2011 TOTAL COMPENSATION

LOGO  

EQUITY AWARDEDIN 2011(3)

March 4, 2011Restricted Stock Units  4,533 units  
March 4, 2011Stock Options11,406 shares
March 4, 2011Performance Shares  6,570 shares
May 13, 2011Restricted Stock Units  8,058 units  
May 13, 2011Stock Options18,312 shares
May 13, 2011Performance Shares11,274 shares

(1)    Each equity grant is disclosed at the grant date fair value of the award.

(2)    Mr. McCormack does not participate in our qualified defined benefit plan because he had not met the applicable eligibility requirements at the time the plan was closed to new participants in 2006.

(3)    In addition to the March 4, 2011 grants Mr. McCormack received grants of long-term incentive awards on May 13, 2011 in connection with his promotion to Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Set forth below is the age (as of May 10, 2012), the principal positions held with McDermott or our subsidiaries, and other business experience information for each of our current executive officers other than our Continuing Named Executives. For information on our Continuing Named Executives, see “Named Executives Profiles” above. Unless we otherwise specify, all positions described below are positions with McDermott International, Inc.

Scott V.Mr. Cummins 49, has served as our Executive Vice President Offshore since March 2014. Previously, he served as: our Senior Vice President and General Manager, Asia Pacific since& Middle East from January 2014 to February 2014; our Senior Vice President and General Manager, Asia Pacific from May 2013 to January 2014; Senior Vice President and General Manager, Asia Pacific, McDermott International Management, Inc. (“MIMI”) from February 2012 to May 2013; Senior Vice President and General Manager, Asia Pacific from November 2011. Previously, he served as: our2011 to February 2012; Vice President and General Manager, Asia Pacific, from July 2010 to November 2011; and Vice President and General Manager, Asia Pacific, of our subsidiary J. Ray McDermott, S.A. (“JRM”) from April 2008 to July 2010; Vice President, Asia Pacific Business Development, Sales and Marketing, of JRM from September 2006 to April 2008; Business Development Director of JRM from September 2003 to August 2006; and Division Manager, Middle East Fabrication Operations of JRM from November 1999 to September 2003.2010. Mr. Cummins joined McDermott in June 1996,1986, and his earlier positions with the CompanyMcDermott include positions in sales and marketing, business development, marine, fabrication and project operations roles.

Stewart A. Mitchell, 45,2013 COMPENSATION

Annual Base Salary

  

Base Salary Earned(1)

  $320,924  

Annual Incentive Compensation

  

Executive Incentive Compensation Plan

  $0  

Long-Term Incentive Compensation(2)

  

Restricted Stock Units

  $749,984  

Stock Options

  $249,998  

Performance Shares

  $499,996  

Pension Plan(3)

  

Annual Change in Present Value of Pension Benefit(3)

  $(80,000

Other Compensation

  

Deferred Compensation Plan Contribution

  $18,750  

Thrift Match

  $N/A  

Service-Based Thrift Contribution

  $N/A  

Tax Payments(4)

  $209,826  

Expatriate Benefits(5)

  $477,284  

Perquisites(1)

  $12,080  

EQUITY AWARDED IN 2013

March 5, 2013

Restricted Stock Units

23,808units

March 5, 2013

Retention Restricted Stock Units

47,619units

March 5, 2013

Stock Options

51,546shares

March 5, 2013

Performance Shares

47,214shares

(1)

As an expatriate employee, Mr. Cummins receives expatriate benefits generally consistent with other expatriate employees. While the Compensation Committee set Mr. Cummins’ annual base salary at $450,000, his base salary earned and perquisite allowance reflect amounts received by Mr. Cummins after deductions were taken under McDermott’s tax equalization program applicable to expatriate employees.

(2)

Each equity grant is disclosed at the grant date fair value of the award.

(3)

The actuarial present value of Mr. Cummins’ pension benefit decreased from December 31, 2012 to December 31, 2013 as a result of a change in assumptions used in computing the present values in each year, namely an increase in the discount rate from 4% to 4.8%.

(4)

Under McDermott’s tax equalization program, we expect to pay approximately $209,826 in Singapore taxes for Mr. Cummins with respect to 2013.

(5)

Expatriate benefits for Mr. Cummins consist of an expatriate premium, hardship premium, commodities and service allowance, housing and utilities allowance, limited vacation airfare, education allowance for an employee’s dependent children and car lease.

LIANE K. HINRICHS

SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT,

GENERAL COUNSEL AND CORPORATE SECRETARY

Age: 56

Tenure with McDermott: 15 years

Ms. Hinrichs has served asbeen our Senior Vice President, General Counsel and General Manager, Middle East,Corporate Secretary since November 2011.October 2008. Previously, heshe served as: ouras our: Vice President, General Counsel and General Manager, Middle East,Corporate Secretary from July 2010 to November 2011; Vice President and General Manager of JRM from JulyJanuary 2007 to July 2010;September 2008; Corporate Secretary and Associate General Manager of Middle East Projects of JRMCounsel, Corporate Compliance and Transactions from January 2006 to December 2006; Associate General Counsel, Corporate Compliance and Transactions, and Deputy Corporate Secretary from June 2004 to December 2005; Assistant General Counsel, Corporate Secretary and Transactions from October 20052001 to June 2007, Project DirectorMay 2004; and Manager of numerous projects for JRMSenior Counsel from January 2002May 1999 to September 2005 and Construction Management and Field Operations of JRM from June 1992 to December 2001. Prior to joining McDermott in 1992, he held project engineering positions with European Marine Contractors (a joint venture company of Brown & Root and Saipem SpA).

Steven W. Roll, 53, has served as our Vice President and General Manager, Atlantic, since November 2011. Previously, he served as: our Vice President, Global Commercial Development from June 2011 to November 2011; Vice President, Global Business Development from May 2011 to June 2011; Vice President, Business Development and Operational Strategy from July 2010 to May 2011; Vice President, Business Development and Operational Strategy of JRM from May 2010 to July 2010; Vice President of JRM from April 2008 to May 2010; and Vice President and General Manager of JRM from January 2002 to April 2008. Mr. Roll has held various other positions since he joined McDermott1999, she was a partner in 1980.a New Orleans law firm.

COMPENSATIONDISCUSSIONAND ANALYSIS2013 COMPENSATION

 

Annual Base Salary

  

Base Salary Earned

  $472,062  

Annual Incentive Compensation

  

Executive Incentive Compensation Plan

  $0  

Long-Term Incentive Compensation(1)

  

Restricted Stock Units

  $774,974  

Stock Options

  $274,995  

Performance Shares

  $549,992  

Pension Plan

  

Annual Change in Present Value of
Pension Benefit(2)

  $(59,630

Other Compensation

  

Deferred Compensation Plan Contribution

  $22,437  

Thrift Match

  $6,911  

Service-Based Thrift Contribution

  $7,650  

Tax Payments

  $0  

Perquisites

  $20,000  

EQUITY AWARDED IN 2013

March 5, 2013

Restricted Stock Units

26,188units

March 5, 2013

Retention Restricted Stock Units

47,619units

March 5, 2013

Stock Options

56,700shares

March 5, 2013

Performance Shares

51,935shares

(1)

Each equity grant is disclosed at the grant date fair value of the award.

(2)

The actuarial present value of Ms. Hinrichs’ pension benefit decreased from December 31, 2012 to December 31, 2013 as a result of a change in assumptions used in computing the present values in each year, namely an increase in the discount rate from 4% to 4.8%.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The following Compensation Discussion and Analysis, or CD&A, provides information relevant to understanding the 20112013 compensation of our executive officers and former executive officers identified in the Summary Compensation Table, whom we refer to as our Named Executives (we refer to our Named Executives other than Mr. Nesser, who retired in 2011, as our “Continuing Named Executives”).NEOs. The following discussion also contains statements regarding future individual and company performance targets and goals. These targets and goals are disclosed in the limited context of our compensation programs and should not be understood to be statements of management’s expectations or estimates of results or other guidance. We caution investors not to apply these statements in other contexts.

Executive Summary

In 2011, theMcDermott’s compensation programs are designed to develop, attract, retain and motivate qualified employees to create, expand and execute sound business opportunities for our company. The Compensation Committee continued its commitmentis committed to targeting reasonable and competitive total direct compensation for our Named Executives,NEOs, with a significant and increased portion of that compensation being performance-based. Accordingly, our compensation programs provide competitive opportunities, but

2013 Compensation Program. Reflecting the earning of most of those opportunities is dependent upon achievement of performance goals and/or stock price performance. Our compensation programs are based on our belief that our ability to attract, retain and motivate qualified employees to develop, expand and execute sound business opportunities is essential to the success of our company. The Compensation Committee, with the assistance of its compensation consultant, has designed and administered compensation programs with the participation of our management in light of this philosophy. These programs generally seek to provide compensation that:

incentivizes and rewards short- and long-term performance, continuity of service and individual contributions; and

promotes retention of well-qualified executives, while aligning the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders.

Reflecting these compensation objectives,Committee’s philosophy, compensation arrangements in 2011 for our Continuing Named Executives resulted in:2013 provided for:

 

target total direct compensation within approximately 15% of the median compensation for officers in comparable positions

  

in our market, with the exceptionThree elements of Mr. Johnson, whose target total direct compensation was set slightly above market due to his demonstrated leadership following the Spin-off;— annual base salary, annual incentive and long-term incentives;

 

performance-based compensation accounting for over 60% of target total direct compensation, on average, as compared to 46% in 2010; and

NEO target total direct compensation, on average, being comprised 64% of performance-based compensation (excluding Mr. Dickson, who joined McDermott on October 31, 2013);

 

NEO annual incentives being comprised 100% of performance-based compensation (excluding Mr. Dickson); and

performance-based compensation accounting for 75% of target long-term incentive compensation, as compared to 50% in 2010.

NEO target long-term incentive, or LTI, compensation being comprised 75% of performance-based compensation (excluding Mr. Dickson).

As in prior years, ourthe Compensation Committee continued to believe that a significant portion of a Named Executive’sNEO’s compensation should be performance-based, designed to promote and rewardfor the achievementpurpose of short- and longer-term objectivesaligning the interests of our NEOs with those of stockholders by rewarding performance that are expected to drivemeets or exceeds established goals, with the ultimate objective of increasing stockholder value. Performance-based compensation for 20112013 reflected a balance amongbetween the goals of driving operational performance and pursuing long-term stock appreciation. With these goals in mind, in 2013 we continued to utilize our established approachesthe approach of tying annual incentives to operating income, and grantingwe granted stock options and performance shares as a componentcomponents of long-term incentives, while implementing some adjustments. Amongin addition to restricted stock units.

For the adjustments2013 annual incentive compensation under our Executive Incentive Compensation Plan, or the EICP, the Compensation Committee established target compensation such that 100% of the 2013 target award opportunity was attributable to financial performance goals, specifically our consolidated operating income, subject to adjustment based upon a participant’s individual performance. For the inclusion of2013 performance shares, the Compensation Committee revised the performance metrics to utilize return on invested capital, as a financial performance component of annual incentives. We also resumed grantingor ROIC, in addition to relative total shareholder return. The performance shares which may vest at the end of a three-year performance period based uponon the attainment of ROIC goals, with the number of shares vesting then based on McDermott’s total shareholder return relative to its peers. The Compensation Committee had decided not to utilize performance shares as an element of long-term incentive compensation in 2010, in anticipationthe average of the spin-off of The Babcock & Wilcox Company to our stockholders ( the “Spin-off”), which was completed on July 30, 2010. InProxy Peer Group total shareholder return.

By using thethese performance metrics described above and emphasizing longer-term performance incentives for the 20112013 compensation program, the Compensation Committee believesintended that our compensation practices helpwould contribute to createthe creation of stockholder value without encouraging executives to take unnecessary and excessive risks to earn incentive compensation.

The significant 2011 adjustments to

2013 Significant Events.Significant events in 2013 included the performance-based elementsfollowing:

Strategic Growth Plan Actions.

The acquisition in March 2013 of Deepsea Group Limited, a United Kingdom-based company that provides subsea and other engineering services to international energy companies, significantly expanding our subsea expertise.

The formation of our subsea division for business development, bidding and project execution and increased oversight responsibility for subsea assets.

The restructuring of our Atlantic operations involving, among other things, reductions of management, administrative, fabrication and engineering personnel, and a plan to discontinue utilization of the Morgan City fabrication facility.

Executive Changes.During the fourth quarter of total direct compensation are reflected below:2013, Mr. David Dickson was appointed as McDermott’s President and Chief Executive Officer and became a member of the Board of Directors, following the retirements of Mr. Stephen M. Johnson, McDermott’s former Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer and Mr. John T. McCormack, McDermott’s former Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer;

2013 Metrics. Although McDermott had revenues for the year ended December 31, 2013 of $2.7 billion and year-end backlog of $4.8 billion, our company recognized an operating loss in 2013.

Realizable Value of Performance-Based Awards.

In accordance with our Compensation Committee’s philosophy and program, these financial results provided for:

 

Annual Incentive:    The 70% financial performance component of theNo NEO annual bonus awards being earned with respect to 2013.

  

incentive forNEO stock options granted in 2011, was 70% based on operating income2012 and 30% based on return on invested capital (“ROIC”). The Compensation Committee believes that ROIC is an appropriate financial measure to use for compensation purposes in addition to operating income because it is an indicator2013 having no realizable value as of McDermott’s capital efficiency and productivity. ROIC incentivizes the efficient management of assets and aligns management’s interests with those of our stockholders by measuring stockholder value creation and/or erosion when compared to the cost of capital.December 31, 2013.

 

Long-Term Incentives:    In 2011, our Compensation Committee increased the percentage of performance-based compensation in our long-term incentive awards for Continuing Named Executives by 50% over 2010. Specifically, performance-based compensation was increased by our Compensation Committee from 50% of long-term incentive compensation for Continuing Named Executives in 2010 to 75% of long-term incentive compensation for Continuing Named Executives in 2011. Additionally, in 2011 our Compensation Committee resumed the use of performance shares, in addition to awards of restricted stock units and stock options. Long-term incentives for Continuing Named Executives in 2011 were comprised 50% of performance shares, 25% of restricted stock units and 25% of stock options, resulting in 75% of long-term incentives being performance-based. The 2011 performance shares may be paid out based upon McDermott’s relative total shareholder return in comparison to its peers over three-, four- and five-year periods. The Compensation Committee believes the performance shares are an appropriate element of incentive compensation in that they align management’s interests with those of our stockholders by focusing on long-term stockholder return.

McDermott’s financial performance in 2011 included:

Consolidated revenue of $3.4 billion, as compared to $2.4 billion for 2010;

Consolidated operating income of $250.7 million, as compared to $314.9 million for 2010; and

Consolidated ROIC of 8%.

Operationally, in 2011 McDermott:

Achieved backlog of $3.88 billion as of December 31, 2011;

Achieved substantial growth in the Asia Pacific segment, as reflected by increases of over 115% in both revenue and operating income in the segment as compared to 2010;

Amended/refinanced its credit facility to extend the scheduled maturity date, provide additional liquidity, obtain additional flexibility under covenants and reduce fees; and

Established a joint venture entity which we co-own with two Brazilian companies, which joint venture plans to bid to provide engineering, procurement and construction services to the oil and gas industry offshore Brazil.

Under McDermott’s 2011 compensation program,

None of the Continuing Named Executives were awarded bonuses under the 2011 EICP. Based on McDermott’s 2011 financial results, the Continuing Named Executives were eligible to earn approximately 18% of their respective 2011 target EICP compensation, subject to the assessment of their respective individual goals. Upon the recommendation of Mr. Johnson based on the 2011 financial results, the Compensation Committee, in the exercise of its discretion, determined that, although the Continuing Named Executives and other participants in the EICP were eligible to earn approximately 18% of their target EICP compensation, 0% would be awarded in light of the financial results. Instead, as recommended by Mr. Johnson, the Compensation Committee determined that the bonus amounts that otherwise would have been payable should effectively be returned to the shareholders in the form of additional operating income. In making this recommendation and decision, respectively, Mr. Johnson and the Compensation Committee considered the increase in 2011

  

revenues of approximately 43%, together with the decreaseNEO performance shares granted in 2011, operating income by approximately 20%, from 2010 levels, the continued performance issues in the Atlantic segment2012 and issues relating to several projects in other segments.2013 having no realizable value as of December 31, 2013.

In making its decision not to award bonuses for 2011 under the EICP, the Compensation Committee noted that Mr. Johnson had achieved the individual performance component, based on the Governance Committee’s assessment of Mr. Johnson’s individual performance against stated goals, and each of Messrs. Elders, Carlson and McCormack and Ms. Hinrichs had achieved their respective individual performance components based on Mr. Johnson’s assessment of their respective individual

performance achievements against stated goals, with the exception of the financial performance goal and safety goal for Mr. McCormack.

As of December 31, 2011, (1) the estimated payout as a percent of target for the performance shares granted in 2011 was 0%, and (2) the share price of our common stock had not exceeded the strike price of the stock options granted in 2011, although as noted below, the estimated payout and share price may change during the term of the performance shares and stock options.

The following table summarizes the 20112013 performance-based compensation opportunities, for each of our Continuing Named Executives as compared to the realizable value of such opportunities as of December 31, 2011:

2013, for each of our NEOs, excluding Mr. Dickson:

20112013 Performance-Based Compensation Opportunity vs.

Realizable Value as of December 31, 20112013

 

LOGO

 

    EICP(1)   Performance
Shares(2)(3)
   Stock
Options(2)(3)
   Total 

S. M. Johnson

        

2011 Opportunity

  $942,603    $2,382,132    $944,089    $4,268,824  

2011 Realizable Value

  $0    $0    $0    $0  

P. L. Elders

        

2011 Opportunity

  $336,911    $595,438    $236,000    $1,168,349  

2011 Realizable Value

  $0    $0    $0    $0  

G. L. Carlson

        

2011 Opportunity

  $199,233    $238,175    $94,406    $531,814  

2011 Realizable Value

  $0    $0    $0    $0  

L. K. Hinrichs

        

2011 Opportunity

  $261,381    $535,894    $212,421    $1,009,696  

2011 Realizable Value

  $0    $0    $0    $0  

J. T. McCormack

        

2011 Opportunity

  $274,549    $634,020    $253,847    $1,162,416  

2011 Realizable Value

  $0    $0    $0    $0  

 

(1)2011

Opportunity Values for EICP are disclosed at the Continuing Named Executives’NEOs’ target EICP award. The 2011 Opportunity Value provided for Mr. McCormack reflects his target EICP award following his promotion to Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer.

(2)2011

Opportunity Values for performance shares and stock options are disclosed at the grant date fair value of the respective awards.

(3)

The 2011 Realizable Values2013 realizable values shown above are measured as of December 31, 2011. However,2013. The value of performance share awards shown above is based on the amountestimated payout as a percent of target, or 0% of the performance shares granted in 20112013, multiplied by the closing price of our common stock as reported on the NYSE as of December 31, 2013 ($9.16). The number of the performance shares granted in 2013 that ultimately vest, if any, will be determined by reference to our total shareholder returnperformance goals over three-, four- and five-year periods.a three-year period. See “Long-Term Incentive Compensation — Analysis of 2011 Equity Grants.Incentives.” The vesting of any of these performance shares would impact the future Realizable Valuerealizable value of these performance share awards. In addition, an increase in our stock price compared to our stock price at December 31, 20112013 may impact the future Realizable Valuerealizable value of the stock option awards granted in 2011.2013.

Over the past two years, McDermott has also adoptedExecutive Compensation Policies and Practices. Below we highlight certain of our executive compensation and governance policies and practices, as summarized below:including both those which we utilize to drive performance and those which we prohibit because we do not believe they would serve our stockholders’ long-term interests:

 

Change in control agreements that: (1) contain what is commonly referred to as a “double trigger,” that is, they provide benefits only upon an involuntary termination or constructive termination of the executive officer within one year following a change in control; (2) do not provide for excise tax gross-ups, thereby eliminating the gross-up provisions in prior agreements; and (3) require the applicable officer’s execution of a release prior to payment of certain benefits.

Our Policies and Practices Include

 

Revised stock ownership guidelines that require our officers at the level of vice president or above and nonemployee directors to retain a dollar value of McDermott stock based on a multiple of their respective base salaries or annual retainers.

þ

Performance-Based Pay — We structure our compensation program to align the interests of officers, including our NEOs, with the interests of our stockholders, and therefore, the majority of target total direct compensation is tied to performance. Performance-based compensation accounts for over 64% of target total direct compensation, on average, for the NEOs (excluding Mr. Dickson), and for over 68% of target total direct compensation for Mr. Johnson.

 

þ

Tally Sheets — We review tally sheets, reflecting historical compensation amounts, for our NEOs prior to making annual executive compensation decisions.

A clawback policy under which McDermott would seek to recover any incentive-based award granted to any executive officer as required by the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act or any other “clawback” provision required by law or the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange; and prohibition of directors, officers and employees from engaging in “short sales” or trading in puts, calls or other options on McDermott’s common stock, and prohibition from engaging in hedging transactions and from holding McDermott shares in a margin account or pledging McDermott shares as collateral for a loan.

þ

Double Trigger Change-in-Control Agreements — Our change-in-control agreements contain a “double trigger,” that is, they provide benefits only upon an involuntary termination or constructive termination of the executive officer within one year following a change in control.

Impact of 2011 Say on Pay Vote on Executive Compensation

þ

Meaningful Stock Ownership Guidelines — All of our NEOs and directors are subject to stock ownership guidelines that require the retention of a dollar value of McDermott stock based on a multiple of their respective base salaries or annual retainers.

In approving the 2012 compensation of the Continuing Named Executives, the Compensation Committee reviewed the vote on the say-on-pay proposal at the 2011 annual general meeting of stockholders. Approximately 99% of the votes cast on the say-on-pay proposal at that meeting were voted in favor of the proposal. The Compensation Committee believes this affirms stockholders’ support of the Company’s approach to executive compensation. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee did not adopt any specific changes based on the vote. The Compensation Committee will continue to consider the outcome of the Company’s

þ

Modest Perquisite Allowance — In 2013, we provided a modest perquisite allowance to certain officers, including the NEOs (with the exception of Mr. Dickson, who joined McDermott in October 2013).

say-on-pay votes when making future compensation decisions for the named executive officers. The Compensation Committee expects to continue to hold the advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation every year.

þ

Annual Review of Share Utilization — We evaluate share utilization levels annually by reviewing overhang levels (the dilutive impact of equity compensation on our stockholders) and annual run rates (the aggregate stock awarded as a percentage of total outstanding shares).

Role of Compensation Committee, Compensation Consultant and Management

þ

Risk Assessment — Our compensation consultant assists the Compensation Committee in conducting an annual risk assessment of our compensation programs.

þ

Clawback Policy — We have a clawback policy that allows McDermott to recover, under certain circumstances, compensation paid to executive officers.

Our Policies and Practices Prohibit

x       Repricing of underwater stock options.

x       Excise tax gross-ups under our change-in-control agreements.

x       Derivatives trading or hedging transactions.

How We Make Compensation Decisions

Compensation CommitteeCommittee..    The Compensation Committee has primary responsibility for determining and approving, on an annual basis, the compensation of our CEO and other executive officers. The Compensation Committee receives information and advice from its compensation consultant as well as from our human resources department and management to assist in compensation determinations.

Compensation Consultant.Our Compensation Committee selected and engaged Pay Governance LLC, or “Pay Governance,” has been engaged by our Compensation Committee to serve as theits consultant to the Compensation Committee on executive and director compensation matters insince November 2010, and Pay Governance has been serving in that capacity since that time.2010. Pay Governance provides advice and analysis to the Compensation Committee on the design, structure and level of executive and director compensation, and, when requested by the Compensation Committee, attends meetings of the Compensation Committee and participates in executive sessions without members of management present. Pay Governance reports directly to the Compensation Committee, and the Compensation Committee reviews, on an annual basis, Pay Governance’s performance and provides Pay Governance with direct feedback on its performance. When requested by the Governance Committee, Pay Governance also attends meetings of the Governance Committee with respect to nonemployee director compensation.

In 2011,During 2013, Pay Governance did not perform any services for McDermott other than as described above. In January 2014, our Compensation Committee assessed whether the work performed by Pay Governance during 2013 raised any conflict of interest, and determined that Pay Governance’s work performed for the Compensation Committee raised no conflict of interest.

Role of CEO and Management. While the Compensation Committee has the responsibility to approve and monitor all compensation for our executive officers, management plays an important role in determining executive compensation. Management, at the request of the Compensation Committee, recommends financial goals and works with Pay Governance to analyze competitive market data and to recommend compensation levels for our executive officers.officers other than the CEO. Our Chief Executive Officer Mr. Johnson, likewise assists the Compensation Committee by providing his evaluation of the performance of our other executive officers and recommending compensation for those officers.officers, including via adjustments to their annual incentive compensation for 2013 based on individual performance.

Compensation Philosophy

McDermott’s compensation programs are designed to develop, attract, retain and motivate qualified employees to create, expand and execute sound business opportunities for our company. The Compensation Committee is committed to targeting reasonable and competitive total direct compensation for our NEOs, with a significant portion of that compensation being performance-based. Our compensation programs provide competitive opportunities, but achievement of most of those opportunities depends on the attainment of performance goals and/or stock price performance. The Compensation Committee (assisted by its compensation consultant and with the participation of management) has designed and administered compensation programs aligned with this philosophy. These programs generally seek to provide compensation that:

incentivizes and rewards short- and long-term performance, continuity of service and individual contributions; and

Overviewpromotes the retention of Compensation Elements

The following table summarizeswell-qualified executives, while aligning the principal elementsinterests of our compensation program forexecutives with those of our Named Executives, which we collectively referstockholders.

Impact of 2013 Say-on-Pay Vote on Executive Compensation

At our 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, over 96% of the votes cast were voted in favor of the advisory vote to as “total directapprove NEO compensation.

Compensation ElementObjectiveKey Features

Annual Base Salary

To provide a fixed level of compensation that helps attract The Compensation Committee considered this result, and retain executives

•   Salary level recognizes an executive officer’s experience, skill and performance, with the goal of being market competitive based on the officer’s role and responsibilities within the organization.

•   Adjustments may be made based on individual performance, inflation, pay relative to market and internal equity considerations.

•   This element is paid in cash.

Annual Incentive

To motivate and reward the achievement of short-term company performance

•   The Compensation Committee establishes an annual incentive bonus opportunity for each Named Executive at the beginning of the year.

•   The annual incentive aligns the Named Executives’ interests with McDermott’s short-term corporate strategies, and correlates pay with the achievement of short-term company goals.

•   To qualify for a payout, McDermott must achieve a predetermined performance threshold. Actual payouts to Named Executives are based on a combination of financial and individual performance factors, as well as other individual contributions throughout the year.

•   This element is paid in cash.

Long-Term Incentives

To motivate and reward the achievement of long-term company performance (typically three or more years), align executives’ interests with those of our stockholders and retain executives

•   Long-term awards for our Named Executives in 2011 consisted of 50% performance shares, 25% stock options and 25% restricted stock units.

Performance Shares

•   Structured to be paid out in shares of McDermott common stock at the end of three-, four- and five-year performance periods to the extent applicable performance goals are met.

•   Performance goals are based on total stockholder return over the applicable performance period relative to McDermott’s peer group. Performance shares pay out at target if these goals are met, below target or not at all if the goals are not met, and above target if the goals are exceeded, up to 200% of the target award.

•   Intended to align the Named Executives’ interests with those of our stockholders with a focus on long-term results.

Stock Options

•   Structured to vest in one-third increments on the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date.

•   Intended to strengthen the relationship between the long-term value of our stock price and the potential financial gain for our Named Executives, as the value of each stock option is realized on exercise only if our stock price increases from the date of grant.

Restricted Stock Units

•   Structured to be paid out in shares of McDermott common stock in one-third increments on the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date.

•   Intended to encourage retention of the Named Executives as the restricted stock units vest based on continued employment with McDermott.

believes this affirms our stockholders’ support of the Compensation Committee’s decisions and our existing executive compensation programs. The Compensation Committee will continue to consider the outcome of our say-on-pay votes when making future compensation decisions for the NEOs. The Compensation Committee expects to continue to hold the advisory vote to approve NEO compensation every year.

Defining Market Range Compensation — Benchmarking

To identify median compensation for each element of total direct compensation, the Compensation Committee relies on “benchmarking.” This involves reviewing the compensation of our Named ExecutivesNEOs relative to the compensation paid to similarly situated executives at companies we consider our peers. As a result, the annual base salary, target annual incentive compensation and target long-term incentiveLTI compensation as a whole for each of the Named ExecutivesNEOs is benchmarked. However, the specific performance metrics and performance levels used within elements of annual and long-term compensation are designed for the principal purpose of supporting our strategic and financial goals and/orand driving the creation of stockholder value, and, as a result, are not generally benchmarked.

Following the engagement of Pay Governance as the Compensation Committee’s consultant in November 2010, Pay Governance reviewed the peer group the Compensation Committee uses for benchmarking at the Compensation Committee’s request and recommended revisions to the component companies. These suggested revisions were discussed and adopted by the Compensation Committee with some further revisions. At the direction of the Compensation Committee, Pay Governance compiled market data from two groups, the2013 Proxy Peer Group and the Survey Group, as discussed below.

Proxy Peer GroupGroup.. In considering our 2013 compensation program, Pay Governance utilized market data based on a set of 1816 comparator companies (the “Proxy“2013 Proxy Peer Group”), identified through a screen of companies withwhose business focus and/or operations are similar to McDermott and financial paritywere, at that time, considered by the Compensation Committee to McDermott.be representative of competitors for managerial talent. In reaffirming the component companies for the 2013 Proxy Peer Group, the Compensation Committee also noted that 56% of the 16 component companies named McDermott as a peer for executive compensation decisions. The component companies of the 2013 Proxy Peer Group are includedlisted on page 4239 of this CD&A. The 2013 Proxy Peer Group component companies were identical to the comparator companies utilized in 2012 and set forth in our proxy statement for our 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “2012 Proxy Peer Group”), except that the 2012 Proxy Peer Group included The Shaw Group, Inc., which was acquired by Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. in February 2013.

Market data from the 2013 Proxy Peer Group was used as the primary reference point for the Named Executives, with the exceptionreflective of Mr. Carlson, due to the lack of proxy information on his position. With the exception of market data provided in connection with Mr. McCormack’s promotion to Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer (“EVP, COO”), market data from the Proxy Peer Group represented 20092011 compensation, as reported in 2010the 2012 proxy statements forof the fiscal year ended 2009,companies in the 2013 Proxy Peer Group, and is not size-adjusted. The market data provided fromsize-adjusted, although the Compensation Committee is aware of these differences when making individual pay decisions.

In this CD&A, references to “market” or “our market” are references to the compensation of similarly situated executives at companies within the 2013 Proxy Peer Group in connection with Mr. McCormack’s promotionrespect to EVP, COO represented 2010 compensation, as reported in 2011 proxy statements foreach NEO and the fiscal year ended 2010.applicable element of compensation.

2013 Survey Peer Group. Pay Governance also utilized market data based on a set of 99 companies in similar industries which participate in Towers Watson surveys (the “Survey“2013 Survey Peer Group”). The 2013 Survey Peer Group is intended to provide a reference point for pay levels within similar industries. Aside from screening companies on the basis of their industry classifications, no further refinements or judgments were applied in the identification of companies within the sample. The component companies of the 2013 Survey Peer Group are includedlisted on page 4239 of this CD&A. The Survey Peer Group was used as a secondary reference for the Named Executives, with the exception of Mr. Carlson, for whom it was used as a primary reference. Market data from the 2013 Survey Peer Group represents 20102011 compensation as reported to the survey and, when possible, was size adjusted. Corporate positions, including that of Mr. Carlson, were evaluated based on both expected 2011 revenues of $3.4 billion and a longer-term objective of $5 billion in annual revenues, and business unit positions were evaluated based on their respective profit and loss levels.expected 2013 revenues for McDermott of $3.8 billion.

In this CD&A references to “market” or “our market” are references to the compensation of executives at companies within the2014 Revised Proxy Peer GroupGroup. It is the Compensation Committee’s practice to periodically review and consider the individual companies used for each Named Executivebenchmarking purposes. The Compensation Committee believes that identification of peers using a broad industry sector code is inadequate and does not establish similarity of operations and business models, nor identify historical competitors for managerial talent — factors the Compensation Committee considers in the selection of companies for benchmarking purposes. Therefore, the Compensation Committee considers the revenues and market

capitalization of the component companies. Based upon this framework and with the exceptionassistance of Mr. Carlson,Pay Governance, in November 2013, the Compensation Committee removed certain of the largest and smallest component companies from this peer group and added two additional companies that are similar in operations and size to McDermott and the Survey Peer Groupremaining companies in the peer group. Following these revisions, the following are the 14 component companies of the peer group that will be used for Mr. Carlson.2014 executive compensation decisions:

Cameron International Corporation

Exterran Holdings, Inc.

Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V.

FMC Technologies, Inc.

Dresser-Rand Group, Inc.

Foster Wheeler AG

Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc.

Oceaneering International, Inc.

Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.

Oil States International, Inc.

KBR, Inc.

Superior Energy Services, Inc.

Noble Corporation plc

Tidewater Inc.

What We Pay and Why: Elements of Total Direct Compensation

Target Total Direct Compensation

Compensation.The Compensation Committee seeks to provide reasonable and competitive compensation. As a result, it targets the elements of total direct compensation, or “TDC,” for our Named ExecutivesNEOs generally within approximately 15% of the median compensation of our market for comparable positions. Throughout this CD&A, we refer to compensation that is within approximately 15% of market median as “market range” compensation.

The Compensation Committee may set elements of total direct compensation above or below the market range to account for a Named Executive’sNEO’s performance and experience, internal pay equity and other factors or situations that are not typically captured by looking at standard market data and practices and thatwhich the Compensation Committee deems relevant to the appropriateness and/or competitiveness of a Named Executive’sNEO’s compensation.

When making decisions regarding individual compensation elements, the Compensation Commit-

teeCommittee also considers the effect on the Named Executive’sNEO’s target total direct compensation and target total cash-based compensation (annual base salary and annual incentives), as applicable. OurThe Compensation Committee’s goal is to establish target compensation for each element that, when combined, create a target total direct compensation award for each Named ExecutiveNEO that is reasonable and competitive and supports the Company’sour compensation philosophy and objectives.

2011 Overview.    The 2011 target total direct compensation for eachaverage allocation of our Named Executives was within the market range of target total direct compensation, except for Mr. Johnson and Mr. Nesser. The target total direct compensation for

Mr. Johnson was set above market range due to Mr. Johnson’s demonstrated leadership as Chief Executive Officer following the Spin-off. The target total direct compensation for Mr. Nesser was set below market range due to no long-term incentives being provided to him in advance of his anticipated retirement.

The chart below shows the 2011 target total direct compensation by element for each Named Executive. Because the amount of compensation actually paid through the compensation elements that are performance-based is not fixed at the outset, Named Executives may earn compensation above or below the market range for similarly situated executives in our market.

2011 Target Total Direct Compensation Summary

Named Executive  

Annual

Base Salary

  

Annual
Incentive(1)

(% of Salary)

 

Long-Term

Incentive(2)

  Target Total
Direct
Compensation as
Percent of
Market(3)
 Percent
Performance-
Based(4)

S. M. Johnson

  $950,000   100% $4,000,000   117% 67%

P. L. Elders

  $485,000   70% $1,000,000   86% 60%

G. L. Carlson

  $336,000   60% $416,720   112% 54%

L. K. Hinrichs

  $440,000   60% $931,767   103% 59%

J. T. McCormack(5)

      

EVP, COO

  $500,000   70% $1,125,000   73% 59%

SVP, Operations

  $400,000   50% $465,000   106% 51%

J. T. Nesser

  $512,508   70%     83% 41%

Average Mix of Compensation Elements(6)

   22%   17%  61%   N/A 60%

(1)When making decisions as to the elements of a Named Executive’s total direct compensation, the Compensation Committee considers the dollar value of annual incentive compensation but typically awards this element as percentages of annual base salary. This is primarily because our market generally targets annual incentive on a percentage-of-salary basis.

(2)The values provided in this column are the target values of long-term incentives approved by the Compensation Committee. For more information on the grant date fair values of long-term incentives, see the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table under “Compensation of Executive Officers” below.

(3)Market = Median annual base salary, based on the benchmark applicable to the executive. 100% represents median compensation.

(4)With the exception of Mr. Nesser, performance-based compensation consists of a Named Executive’s annual incentive and 75% of the target value of long-term incentives, representing that portion of long-term incentive compensation attributable to performance shares and stock options. For Mr. Nesser, performance-based compensation consists only of Mr. Nesser’s annual incentive, as he was not granted long-term incentive compensation in 2011 in anticipation of his retirement by year-end 2011.

(5)In connection with Mr. McCormack’s promotion to EVP, COO on June 30, 2011, Mr. McCormack’s annual base salary and annual incentive compensation target were increased. Additionally, Mr. McCormack received a supplemental long-term incentive award with a target value of $660,000, which, when combined with the long-term incentive award of $465,000 granted to him in March 2011, resulted in total long-term incentives of $1,125,000.

(6)The values provided for the average mix of compensation elements do not include Mr. McCormack’s target compensation pertaining to his former position or Mr. Nesser’s target compensation.

While the Compensation Committee does not set a specific target allocation among the elements of total direct compensation, it believes that a significant portion of a Named Executive’s total direct compensation should be performance-based. As shown above, excluding Mr. McCormack’s target compensation from his former position and Mr. Nesser’s target compensation, on average, performance-based compensation accounted for approximately 60% of a Named Executive’s 2011 target total direct compensation and 75% of his or her long-term incentive compensation, representing that portion of long-term incentive compensation attributable to performance shares and stock options.

Annual Base Salary

The 2011 base salaries for our Named Executives, which reflect increases that became effective as of April 1, 2011, wereNEOs in 2013 (excluding Mr. Dickson) was as follows:

 

LOGO

Named Executive 

2011 Annual

Base Salary

  Percent
Increase
 Percent of
Market(1)

S. M. Johnson

 $950,000   3.26% 106%

P.L. Elders

 $485,000   3.19% 105%

G. L. Carlson

 $336,000   5.00% 105%

L. K. Hinrichs

 $440,000   4.19% 114%

J. T. McCormack

   

EVP, COO

 $500,000   N/A 81%

SVP, Operations

 $400,000   3.09% 110%

J. T. Nesser

 $512,508   0.00% 100%

(1)Market = Median annual base salary, based on the benchmark applicable to the executive. 100% represents median compensation.

When consideringAnnual Base Salary. We pay base salaries effective April 1, 2011,to provide a fixed level of compensation that helps attract and retain executives. Base salary levels recognize an executive officer’s experience, skill and performance, with the Compensation Committee sought to set salariesgoal of being market competitive based on the officer’s role and responsibilities within the market range. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee set annual base salaries within market range for each Named Executive, with year-over-year increases ranging from 0-5%.

In May 2011, in consideration of the market compensation analysis and recommendation provided by Pay Governance in connection with Mr. McCormack’s June 30, 2011 promotion to EVP, COO, the Compensation Committee increased Mr. McCormack’s base salary to $500,000 effective June 30, 2011. The Compensation Committee approved this slightly below market salaryorganization. Adjustments may be made based on Mr. McCormack’sindividual performance, inflation, pay relative experience with his new

positionto market and in light of internal pay equity considerations.

Annual Incentive Compensation

2011 Overview and Target CompensationIncentive.. The Compensation Committee administers our annual incentive compensation program under our Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (the “EICP”).

The EICP is a cash incentive plan designed to motivate and reward our Named ExecutivesNEOs and other key employees for their contributions to business goals and other factors that we believe drive our earnings and promote creation of stockholder value.

The target 2011 EICP compensation for our Named Executives was as follows:

Named Executive  Target EICP
(% of annual
base salary)
 Percent  of
Market(1)

S. M. Johnson

  100% 102%

P. L. Elders

  70% 87%

G. L. Carlson

  60% 121%

L. K. Hinrichs

  60% 85%

J. T. McCormack(2)

   

EVP, COO

  70% 71%

SVP, Operations

  50% 113%

J. T. Nesser

  70% 67%

(1)Market = Median target annual incentive compensation, based on the benchmark applicable to the executive. 100% represents median compensation.

(2)Mr. McCormack’s target EICP was prorated based on his length of service at his current and former positions.

The 2011 target EICP for Messrs. Johnson, Elders and Nesser remained unchanged from their respective 2010 targets. Mr. Carlson’s and Ms. Hinrichs’ respective targets were each increased to 60% of annual base salary earned for 2011. This resulted in an above-market target for Mr. Carlson; however, the Compensation Committee deemed this target appropriate based on internal pay equity considerations. Mr. McCormack’s 2011 target EICP was increased to 50% of annual base salary earned when the targets were set by the Compensation Committee in February 2011 based on internal pay equity considerations. The target was then increased to 70% in connection with his promotion to EVP, COO in June 2011 to bring his target EICP award closer to market range for his new position and based on internal pay equity considerations.

2011 EICP2013 Financial Performance Goals.    Traditionally, EICP compensation has consisted of a financial performance component and an individual performance component. To continue to drive performance of McDermott’s operations, the 2011100% of a participant’s EICP target compensation for officers, including the Named Executives,award opportunity was also set utilizing financial and individual performance components. Generally, the 2011 target EICP was split between financial and individual components as follows:

70% of target EICP was attributable to financial performance, of which 70% was attributable tobased on McDermott’s consolidated operating income and 30% was attributable to return on invested capital; and

30% of target EICP was attributable to individual performance.

Financial performance is the largest factor in determining EICP compensation, because the Compensation Committee generally considers it to be more objective and to more directly influence the creation of stockholder value, as compared to individual performance. Individual performance, however, serves as an important metric to help promote the achievement of strategic goals that may not be measured in an annual financial metric. To reward significant individual contributions, the Compensation Committee maintained the individual component for 2011 at 30% of target EICP for 2011. However, to maintain the emphasis on financial performance, payment of EICP compensation (including for individual performance) required the attainment of the threshold level of operating income financial performance. The maximum EICP compensation a Named Executive could earn in 2011 was a multiple of 2x target EICP. For all Named Executives, the Compensation Committee had the discretion to decrease an EICP payment.

As a result, for each Named Executive the EICP payment amount was principally determined based on: (1) the attainment of annual financial goals; and (2) the attainment of annual individual goals, as displayed below:

LOGO

2011 Financial Performance Goals.    Historically, the financial goals for the EICP consisted of operating income levels related to McDermott and/or business unit operating income relevant to each Named Executive.2013. The Compensation Committee considers operating income an appropriate financial measure to use for compensation purposes because it is the primary driver of net income, which the Compensation Committee expects to drive our stock price. In comparison to net income, however,Based on McDermott’s management’s internal projections of operating income is more directly influenced byfor fiscal year 2013, the revenues generated and costs incurred as a result of management action. In 2011, operating income comprised 70% of the financial performance component of a Named Executive’s target EICP award.

In 2011, the Compensation Committee added return on invested capital, or ROIC, as an additional financial performance metric under the EICP. The Compensation Committee considers ROIC an appropriate financial measure to use for compensation purposes because it is an indicator of McDermott’s capital efficiency and productivity. ROIC also incentivizes the management of assets, and aligns management’s interest with those of our stockholders by measuring stockholder value creation and/or erosion when compared to the cost of capital. ROIC comprised 30% of the financial performance component of a Named Executive’s target EICP award for 2011.

The Compensation Committee established three primary levels of operating income and ROIC goals, which together would determine the threshold (0.25x), target (1.0x) and maximum amounts that(2.0x) payments a participant would be paideligible to earn under the EICP in 2013. To further maintain the emphasis on financial performance, componentearning any EICP payment required the attainment of the EICP. In establishing the target level, the Compensation Committee considered management’s internal estimates of operating income and ROIC, discussed those estimates with Mr. Johnson, and then set the target level and threshold and maximum levels as a percentage of the target level. The Compensation Committee designs incentive compensation to drive target level performance and does not believe that compensation should be earned for performance substantially below that level. As a result, no EICP compensation would be earned (including for individual performance) unless the threshold level of operating income financial performanceincome. The maximum EICP compensation a NEO could earn in 2013 was attained, irrespectivea multiple of the level of ROIC attained. The Compensation Committee believes that Named

Executives should be rewarded for superior financial performance. It therefore establishes a maximum level performance goal to incentivize higher performance, but caps the payout to maximize returns to stockholders for performance above the maximum payout level.

2x his or her target award. For other levels of operating income and ROIC between threshold and maximum, the percentagemultiple paid would be determined by linear interpolation using the two neighboring pre-established performance levels and payout as a multiple of target award. No payment would have been earned underThe Compensation Committee also had the discretion to decrease an EICP for 2011 if operating income results had been below the threshold level, notwithstanding the ROIC performance level.

payment. A Named ExecutiveNEO would have been eligible to earn the following amounts under the 20112013 EICP based on McDermott attaining the following levels of operating income and ROIC:

2011 EICP Payout Matrixincome:

 

 

    Result  Consolidated Operating
Income (in millions)
   Multiple
   >120  >$273    2.00

Maximum

   120  $273    2.00

Target

   100  $227    1.00

Threshold

   70  $159    0.25
   <70  <$159    0.00

 

As a result of McDermott’s operating loss in 2013, the threshold level of operating income was not attained, and, accordingly, no bonuses were paid under the EICP for 2013.

    Performance
Goal
 

Consolidated
Operating
Income

(in millions)

  

Payout(1)

(as a multiple
of target
EICP award)

     Performance
Goal
 Consolidated
ROIC
 

Payout(2)

(as a multiple of
target EICP
award)

  >120% >$420  2.00    >120% >16.7% 2.00

Maximum

  120% $420  2.00    120% 16.7% 2.00
  110% $385  1.50    110% 15.3% 1.50

Target

  100% $350  1.00    100% 13.9% 1.00
  90% $315  0.75    97% 13.4% 0.75
  80% $280  0.50    93% 12.9% 0.50

Threshold

  70% $256  0.25    90% 12.4% 0.25
  < 70% <$245  0.00    <90% <12.4% 0.00

(1)The Payout for consolidated operating income is a multiple of target EICP award with respect to the 70% portion of financial performance goals attributable to operating income.

(2)The Payout for consolidated ROIC is a multiple of target EICP award with respect to the 30% portion of financial goals attributable to ROIC.

20112013 Individual Performance Goals.    IndividualGoals. Although EICP target award opportunities for 2013 were 100% attributable to financial performance goals, the Compensation Committee recognizes the importance of individual performance in contributing to the achievement of strategic goals that may not be measured in an annual financial metric. Accordingly, the CEO’s EICP award is subject to adjustment by the Compensation Committee, in its sole discretion, based on the CEO’s individual performance, including the individual performance objectives established for each Named Executive were tailored to the individual’s position and focused on supporting strategic initiatives and achieving common goals. Mr. Johnson’s individual goals were establishedCEO by the Compensation Committee. Each Named Executive, withThe EICP awards of the exception of Messrs. Johnsonother NEOs were subject to adjustment by the CEO based on each NEO’s individual performance, including each NEO’s individual performance objectives established by such NEO and

Nesser, proposed their respective individual goals, which were approved by Mr. Johnson. No individual goals were established for Mr. Nesser in lightthe CEO, with any such adjustment subject to the approval of his anticipated retirement bythe Compensation Committee. Prior to year-end 2011. The individual goals for our Continuing Named Executives’ 2011 EICP compensation are set forth in2013, the table on the following page.

Stephen M. Johnson:

•    Lead the Company and set a philosophy that is well understood, widely supported, consistently applied and effectively implemented;

•    Establish a clearly-articulated and executable strategy for the Company which conserves cash and leverages capital expenditures in a conservative manner;

•    Establish appropriate annual and long-term financial objectives; ensure that appropriate systems are maintained to protect assets and maintain effective control of operations;

•    Develop, attract, retain, motivate and supervise an effective top management team capable of achieving objectives; provide for executive management succession planning;

•    Serve as the chief spokesperson for the Company, communicating effectively with shareholders and stakeholders;

•    Work closely with the Board of Directors to keep them fully informed on all important aspects of the Company; make timely recommendations for Board action and respond to suggestions and directives from the Board and its committees;

•    Achieve specific safety goals and objectives and promote safe work practices as the highest operational priority; and

•    Assure that all operations and business dealings are conducted with the utmost compliance with applicable laws and regulations and the highest level of ethical behavior is exhibited by the Company.

Perry L. Elders:

•    Convert the capital allocation, management reporting, revenue pipeline and estimating methodology from project initiatives into recurring processes;

•    Build a high performing finance team, including succession and development planning as well as implement development plans including changing duties of certain individuals;

•    Form a capital team to oversee and manage the capital allocation and authorization process as well as identify and evaluate sources of capital;

•    Assess and optimize cash investments;

•    Establish balance sheet forecasts, improve annual budget process, establish operating unit level invested capital calculations to drive ROIC reporting; and

•    Assist the CEO and executive management with developing a new culture within the Company.

Gary L. Carlson:

•    Design and implement a global employee classification scheme;

•    Deploy talent development and succession planning program to the project organization including discrete, measurable, and time sensitive candidate development plans;

•    Design and implement a global career development and performance management program;

•    Close the Third Country National pension plan to new participants and freeze benefit accruals thereunder, and establish a new defined contribution plan for non-U.S. expatriates;

•    Design a comprehensive mobilization program revision road map; and

•    Establish a comprehensive information technology plan and governance model, and complete the 2011 information technology initiatives on time and within budget.

Liane K. Hinrichs:

•    Lead the legal group through post Spin-off reorganization;

•    Work with the Board of Directors and management to continue enhancements to the ERM program; and

•    Lead the review, analysis and response to any significant changes in compliance requirements.

John T. McCormack:

•    Achieve specific safety goals and objectives;

•    Achieve specific levels of financial performance with respect to operating income, return on invested capital and new bookings;

•    Provide for executive management succession planning; and

•    Improve communications among the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer, McDermott operations personnel and customers.

2011 Annual Incentive Compensation Payments.    The 2011 target and final EICP compensation amounts for each Named Executive are shown in the table below.

2011 EICP Payment Summary

Named Executive 2011 EICP
Target
% of Salary
  

Final
2011

Annual
Incentive

 

S. M. Johnson

 100%  $0  

P. L. Elders

   70%  $0  

G. L. Carlson

   60%  $0  

L. K. Hinrichs

   60%  $0  

J. T. McCormack(1)

   

EVP, COO

   70%  

SVP, Operations

   50%  $0  

J. T. Nesser

   70%  $206,408  

(1)Mr. McCormack’s target EICP was prorated based on his length of service at his current and former positions.

Analysis of 2011 EICP Payments.    In February 2012,CEO presented the Compensation Committee considered (1) McDermott’s 2011 consolidated operating income and ROIC; (2) Mr. Johnson’s self-assessmentwith performance reviews of his individual performance relative to his individual goals; (3) the nonemployee directors’ assessment of the individual performance of Mr. Johnson;direct reports. Following this review and (4) Mr. Johnson’s recommendation of each other Continuing Named Executive’s 2011 EICP compensation based on his assessment of the financial and individual performance applicable to each of those Continuing Named Executives.

In order to determine whether the financial goals2013 operating results, no adjustments were attained,made by the Compensation Committee, utilized McDermott’s consolidated operating income, which was slightly above the threshold level of $245.0 million, and consolidated ROIC of 8%, which was below the threshold level of 12.4%. The consolidated ROIC percentage was derived by dividing (1) the sum of income from continuing operations before noncontrolling interest less net income attributable to noncontrolling interest by (2) the average net assets during 2011, which was calculated by subtracting current liabilities from total assets. The consolidated operating income of $250.7 million resulted in a notional payout level of approximately 26% with respectaccordingly, no NEO received an EICP award for 2013. Due to the 70% portion of the financial performance goals attributable to operating income, and the consolidated ROIC of 8% resulteddate Mr. Dickson commenced his employment with McDermott, he was not eligible for an EICP award in a notional payout of 0.00% with respect to the 30% portion of2013.

financial performance goals attributable to consolidated ROIC. The combined operating income and ROIC performance resulted in eligibility of the participants in the EICP to earn approximately 18% of their target EICP compensation, subject to the assessment of their individual goals.

The Continuing Named Executives.    None of the Continuing Named Executives were awarded bonuses under the 2011 EICP. Based on McDermott’s 2011 financial results, the Continuing Named Executives were eligible to earn approximately 18% of their respective 2011 target EICP compensation, subject to the assessment of their respective individual goals. Upon the recommendation of Mr. Johnson based on the 2011 financial results, the Compensation Committee, in the exercise of its discretion, determined that, although the Continuing Named Executives and other participants in the EICP were eligible to earn approximately 18% of their target EICP compensation, 0% would be awarded in light of the financial results. Instead, as recommended by Mr. Johnson, the Compensation Committee determined that the bonus amounts that otherwise would have been payable should effectively be returned to the shareholders in the form of additional operating income, resulting in the reported consolidated operating income of $250.7 million. In making this recommendation and decision, respectively, Mr. Johnson and the Compensation Committee considered the increase in 2011 revenues of approximately 43%, together with the decrease in 2011 operating income by approximately 20%, from 2010 levels, the continued performance issues in the Atlantic region and issues relating to several projects in other regions.

In making its decision not to award bonuses for 2011 under the EICP, the Compensation Committee noted that Mr. Johnson had achieved the individual performance component, based on the Governance Committee’s assessment of Mr. Johnson’s individual performance against stated goals, and each of Messrs. Elders, Carlson and McCormack and Ms. Hinrichs had achieved their respective individual performance components based on Mr. Johnson’s assessment of their respective individual performance achievements against stated goals, with the exception of the financial performance goal and a safety goal for Mr. McCormack.

Mr. Nesser.    Pursuant to the terms of Mr. Nesser’s separation agreement entered into in connection with his retirement, Mr. Nesser was paid

his prorated 2011 EICP compensation in August 2011. Per the terms of his separation agreement, Mr. Nesser was paid a cash payment equal to his target bonus under the EICP times a fraction, the numerator of which was the number of days elapsed in the year in which the retirement took place and the denominator of which was 365. Mr. Nesser received a prorated target bonus of $206,408, based on his partial year service. For more information regarding Mr. Nesser’s separation agreement, see “Employment and Severance Arrangements — Employment and Separation Agreements” below.

Long-Term Incentive Compensation

Incentives.The Compensation Committee believes that the interests of our stockholders are best served when a significant percentage of executive compensation is comprised of equity and other long-term incentivesLTI that appreciate in value contingent uponon increases in the value of our common stock and other performance measures that reflect improvements in McDermott’s business fundamentals. Therefore, long-term incentiveLTI compensation represents the single largest element of our Named Executives’NEOs’ total direct compensation.

Analysis of 2011 Equity Grants.

Mix of 2011 Equity. In 2011,2013, the Compensation Committee allocated long-term incentiveLTI compensation to executive officers, including the Continuing Named Executives,NEOs, as follows:

 

50% performance shares;

 

Performance Shares  Non-Qualified Stock Options Restricted Stock Units

50%

  25% 25%

 

25% non-qualified stock options; and

25% restricted stock units.

To strengthen its commitment to performance-based compensation, the Compensation Committee resumed using performancePerformance Shares. Performance shares in 2011. The Compensation Committee believes the granting of total shareholder return (“TSR”) performance shares is an appropriate element of incentive compensation, in that TSR performance sharesare intended to align the Continuing Named Executives’NEOs’ interests with those of our stockholders, with a focus on long-term results. The amountperformance shares awarded in 2013 are structured to be paid out in shares of McDermott common stock, if any, at the end of a three-year performance period, to the extent applicable performance goals are met. If the threshold return on invested capital (“ROIC”) performance goal is achieved, a number of performance shares between 50% and 150% of the target award may be earned. This ROIC award percentage is then modified by a multiple of 0.66x to 1.33x based on McDermott’s total shareholder return (“TSR”) relative to an average of the 2013 Proxy Peer Group TSR over the applicable performance period to determine the final number of performance shares that vest, if any,will ultimately be earned. The Compensation Committee considers ROIC an appropriate financial measure to use for compensation purposes, because it is scheduled to initially be determined atan indicator of McDermott’s capital efficiency and productivity, incentivizes the endproper management of three calendar years (including 2011) based on McDermott’s TSR relativeassets and aligns management’s interests with those of our stockholders by measuring stockholder value creation and/or erosion when compared to the Proxy Peer Group during the same period, with subsequent measurementscost of TSR relative to the Proxy Peer Group at the end of four and five calendar years (including 2011).capital. The total percentage of performance shares which

will vest, if any, may range in amount between 0% and 200% of the number of shares granted, depending on McDermott’s TSR relative to the Proxy Peer Group over the applicable measurement periods. As of December 31, 2011, the estimated payout as a percentage of target forCompensation Committee also believes the performance shares grantedshould remain highly sensitive to our stock price, in 2011 was 0% dueorder to the Company’s share price performance versus the Proxy Peer Group.

As in 2009 and 2010, in 2011further align management’s interests with those of our stockholders. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee continuedretained TSR as a modifier to usethe ROIC performance results for the 2013 performance share awards.

Stock Options. Stock Options are intended to strengthen the relationship between the long-term value of our common stock and the potential compensation for our NEOs, as the value of the stock options which reward and drive performance basedis realized on absoluteexercise only to the extent our stock price improvement.increases after the date of grant. The stock options generally vest in one-third increments on the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date and have an option term of seven years. As of December 31, 2011,2013, the trading price of our common stock was below the Company’s shares had not exceeded the strikeexercise price of the stock options granted in 2011.2013.

Similarly, as in 2008, 2009 and 2010, the Compensation Committee awarded restricted stock units to the Continuing Named Executives, although such restricted stock units represented a smaller percentage of the Continuing Named Executive’s long-term incentive compensation than in the recent past.Restricted Stock Units. Restricted stock units are intended to promote the retention of employees, including the Continuing Named Executives,NEOs. The RSUs granted in 2013 generally vest in one-fourth increments on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date. Grants of RSUs in previous years generally vestvested in one-third increments on the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date.

In 2011 our The Compensation Committee adopted a clawback policy under which McDermott would seekextended this vesting schedule for RSUs granted in 2013 to recover any incentive-based award granted to any executive officer as required by the provisionsbetter promote long-term retention of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act or any other “clawback” provision required by law or the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange. Each grant made to the Continuing Named Executives in 2011 was subject to this clawback policy.employees.

Additionally, and consistent with our recent past practice, our grant agreements for awards made in 2011 contained a forfeiture provision. In 2011, this provision provided that in the event that, while the grantee is employed by McDermott or performing services on behalf of McDermott under any consulting agreement, the grantee is convicted of a misdemeanor involving fraud, dishonesty or moral turpitude or a felony, or the grantee engages in conduct that adversely affects or, in the sole judgment of2013 NEO Compensation

Excluding Mr. Dickson, the Compensation Committee, may reasonably be expectedCommittee’s actions relating to adversely affect, the business reputation

or economic interests of the Company, then all rights and benefits awarded under the respective agreements are immediately forfeited, terminated and withdrawn.

For more information regarding the 2011 performance shares, stock options and restricted stock units, see the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table under “Compensation of Executive Officers” below.

Value of 2011 Long-Term Incentive Compensation.    The 2011 target long-term incentiveNEO compensation for our Named Executives was as follows:2013 resulted in:

 

Average annual base salary increases of approximately 3.5%, excluding Messrs. Cummins and Mitchell. Messrs. Cummins and Mitchell received base salary increases of approximately 9% to further align their annual base salaries with market range.

 

Named Executive(1)  Target LTI
Value
   Percent  of
Market(2)

S. M. Johnson

  $4,000,000    125%

P. L. Elders

  $1,000,000    79%

G. L. Carlson

  $416,720    114%

L. K. Hinrichs

  $931,767    105%

J. T. McCormack(3)

EVP, COO

SVP, Operations

  $

$

1,125,000

465,000

  

  

  81%

100%

(1)No long-term incentive award was granted to Mr. Nesser in 2011 in light of his anticipated retirement by year-end 2011.

(2)Market = Median target long-term incentives based on the benchmark applicable to the executive. 100% represents median compensation.

(3)The target LTI value shown in connection with Mr. McCormack’s promotion to EVP, COO reflects his March 2011 LTI award in addition to a supplemental award in the amount of $660,000 in connection with his promotion. Percent of market reflected for Mr. McCormack’s current position is the percent of market based upon a combination of Mr. McCormack’s target LTI award values from his former and current positions.

When considering theNo increases in annual target values of long-term incentive to be provided to the Continuing Named Executives, the Compensation Committee sought to set target values within the market range. Accordingly, each Continuing Named Executive’s target long-term incentive value was within market range,bonus, with the exception of Messrs. JohnsonCummins and EldersMitchell, who received increases in annual target bonus percentage for internal pay equity reasons and in recognition of their appointments to our executive leadership team.

Modifications to the value of long-term incentives awarded, as compared to 2012, based on an individual’s performance, and in the case of Messrs. Cummins and Mitchell, to further align the value of their LTI with market range.

The compensation of each NEO is discussed in more detail below.

David Dickson.Mr. McCormack’s target long-term incentive value associatedDickson began his employment with his promotionMcDermott in October 2013, initially as our Chief Operating Officer, with the agreement that he would become our President and Chief Executive Officer and a member of our Board of Directors in December 2013. In determining the compensation to EVP, COObe provided to Mr. Dickson in June 2011. When granted,2013, the Compensation Committee considered input from Pay Governance based on market data relating to public company executives with similar levels of experience to Mr. Dickson, as well as the value of Mr. Johnson’sDickson’s unvested compensation from his former employer that he forfeited at the time of joining McDermott. For 2013, the Compensation Committee approved an annual base salary for Mr. Dickson of $850,000. Based on the date of Mr. Dickson’s commencement of employment with McDermott, he was not eligible for an annual incentive award or for a regular grant of long-term incentives in 2013. However, the Compensation Committee approved a one-time grant of restricted stock, with a grant date value of $3.8 million, which was intended to compensate him for the forfeiture of incentives from his former employer, as well as a cash signing bonus of $480,000, which was intended to compensate him for other benefits from his former employer that he was foregoing by joining McDermott. Of the grant of restricted stock, $1.5 million will vest on June 15, 2014, subject to Mr. Dickson’s continued employment with McDermott, and the remaining $2.3 million of the award will vest in three equal tranches on June 15, 2015, 2016 and 2017, with the payment of each tranche subject to Mr. Dickson’s continued employment with McDermott.

The Compensation Committee also approved Mr. Dickson’s participation in McDermott’s long-term incentive award arrangements, commencing in 2014, with a target annual award opportunity for 2014 of between $3.5 million and $4.0 million and for later years of at least $4.0 million. Additionally, Mr. Dickson is eligible for participation in the EICP beginning in 2014, with a target bonus equal to his base salary. The contemplated compensation package for 2014 was positioned approximately 8% above the 25th percentile and approximately 20% below the 50th percentile of the 2013 Proxy Peer Group. This positioning reflects Mr. Dickson’s relative experience as a Chief Executive Officer, and, based on input from Pay Governance, is consistent with other newly appointed Chief Executive Officers among the 2013 Proxy Peer Group.

Perry L. Elders. Mr. Elders has served as McDermott’s Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since July 2010. In determining Mr. Elders’ compensation, the Compensation Committee considered market data from the 2013 Proxy Peer Group as the primary reference and from the Survey Peer Group as a secondary reference. Mr. Elders’ total target direct compensation for 2013 is summarized below:

 

    Annual Base Salary 

Annual Incentive

(% of Salary)

 Long-Term Incentive

Approved Compensation

  $515,000 70% $1,100,000

Percentage of Market(1)

  97% 85% 76%

Percentage of Target TDC

  26% 18% 56%

 

(1)

Market = Median target for each compensation element based on the 2013 Proxy Peer Group. 100% represents median compensation.

Mr. Elders received a 2.91% annual base salary increase in 2013, while his annual incentive target award remained unchanged. The Compensation Committee approved long-term incentives for Mr. Elders with a target value of $1,100,000, which represented a decrease of 19% from the target

value of long-term incentives awarded to Mr. Elders in 2012. Performance-based compensation represented 60% of Mr. Elders’ total target direct compensation. This consisted of Mr. Elders’ target value annual incentive compensation and the 75% of his target value of long-term incentive compensation that was aboveattributable to performance shares and stock options.

Scott V. Cummins. Mr. Cummins has served as McDermott’s Executive Vice President, Offshore since March 2014, and served as Senior Vice President and General Manager, Asia Pacific during 2013, with responsibility for the Middle East region from January to February 2014. In determining Mr. Cummins’ compensation, the Compensation Committee considered market data from the 2013 Proxy Peer Group as the primary reference for his annual base salary and long-term incentives and from the Survey Peer Group as the primary reference for his annual incentives. Mr. Cummins’ total target direct compensation for 2013 is summarized below:

 

    Annual Base Salary(1) 

Annual Incentive

(% of Salary)

 Long-Term Incentive

Approved Compensation

  $450,000 70% $1,000,000

Percentage of Market(2)

  88% 110% 94%

Percentage of Target TDC

  26% 18% 57%

 

(1)

While the Compensation Committee set Mr. Cummins’ annual base salary at $450,000, as an expatriate employee, Mr. Cummins’ base salary earned during 2013 reflects deductions taken under McDermott’s tax equalization program applicable to expatriate employees, resulting in annual base salary earned of $320,924.

(2)

Market = Median target for each compensation element based on the 2013 Proxy Peer Group. 100% represents median compensation.

Mr. Cummins received increases in each element of his total direct compensation to bring each element of total direct compensation closer to market range in orderand to further compensate Mr. Johnson forreflect his performance following the Spin-off, while continuingappointment to incentivize him based on the long-term performance of McDermott. The valueour Executive Leadership Team during 2013. Performance-based compensation represented 60% of Mr. Elders’Cummins’ total target direct compensation. This consisted of Mr. Cummins’ target value annual incentive compensation and the 75% of his target value of long-term incentive compensation that was belowattributable to performance shares and stock options.

Liane K. Hinrichs. Ms. Hinrichs has served as McDermott’s Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary since October 2008. In determining Ms. Hinrichs’ compensation, the Compensation Committee considered market data from the 2013 Proxy Peer Group as the primary reference and from the Survey Peer Group as a secondary reference. Ms. Hinrichs’ total target direct compensation for 2013 is summarized below:

range; however, combined

 

    Annual Base Salary 

Annual Incentive

(% of Salary)

 Long-Term Incentive

Approved Compensation

  $477,750 70% $1,100,000

Percentage of Market(1)

  116% 89% 103%

Percentage of Target TDC

  25% 17% 58%

 

(1)

Market = Median target for each compensation element based on the 2013 Proxy Peer Group. 100% represents median compensation.

Ms. Hinrichs received a 4.76% annual base salary increase in 2013, while her annual incentive target award remained unchanged. The Compensation Committee approved long-term incentives for Ms. Hinrichs with a target value of $1,100,000, which represented an increase of 10% from the target value of long-term incentives awarded to Ms. Hinrichs in 2012. Performance-based compensation

represented 61% of Ms. Hinrichs’ total target direct compensation. This consisted of Ms. Hinrichs’ target value annual incentive compensation and the 75% of her target value of long-term incentive compensation that was attributable to performance shares and stock options.

Stephen M. Johnson. Mr. Johnson served as McDermott’s President and Chief Executive Officer from July 2010 until his retirement in December 2013. During this time, he also served as Chairman of our Board of Directors from May 2011 until December 2013. In determining Mr. Johnson’s compensation, the Compensation Committee considered market data from the 2013 Proxy Peer Group as the primary reference and from the Survey Peer Group as a secondary reference. Mr. Johnson’s total target direct compensation for 2013 is summarized below:

 

    Annual Base Salary 

Annual Incentive

(% of Salary)

 Long-Term Incentives

Approved Compensation

  $985,000 100% $5,000,000

Percentage of Market(1)

  100% 97% 120%

Percentage of Target TDC

  14% 14% 72%

 

(1)

Market = Median target for each compensation element based on the 2013 Proxy Peer Group. 100% represents median compensation.

Mr. Johnson received a 3.55% annual base salary increase in 2013, after receiving no increase to his annual base salary at his request in 2012. Both Mr. Johnson’s EICP target award and the target value of his long-term incentives remained unchanged in 2013. Performance-based compensation represented 68% of Mr. Johnson’s total target direct compensation for 2013. This consisted of Mr. Johnson’s target value annual incentive compensation and the 75% of his target value of long-term incentive compensation that was attributable to performance shares and stock options.

In connection with his retirement, we entered into a separation agreement with Mr. Johnson providing for various compensation-related benefits in exchange for, among other things, his agreement to provide post-retirement consulting services and comply with several restrictive covenants, including covenants not to compete. Under that separation agreement: (1) all outstanding stock options held by Mr. Johnson that were not vested but would, absent his retirement from employment, become vested and exercisable through March 15, 2016 were vested and became exercisable in accordance with the other componentsterms of the 2009 LTIP and the applicable grant agreements, as if his employment had continued through March 15, 2016, and all stock options held by Mr. Johnson will continue to be exercisable, in each case until the stated maximum expiration date in the applicable grant agreement, notwithstanding any provision thereof providing for earlier termination in the event of termination of employment; (2) each outstanding RSU award held by Mr. Johnson which would, absent his retirement from employment, remain outstanding and continue to vest through March 15, 2017 will, subject to certain conditions, vest in full and be settled in accordance with the terms of the 2009 LTIP and the applicable grant agreement as if his employment had continued through March 15, 2017, with such vesting and settlement to be effected on the earlier to occur of March 15, 2015 or the next anniversary of the grant date (as set forth in the applicable award agreement) following the completion of the consulting period described below; and (3) each outstanding performance share award held by Mr. Johnson which would, absent his retirement from employment, remain outstanding and continue to vest through March 15, 2017 will remain in full force and effect and, to the extent applicable, continue to vest and be settled in accordance with the terms of the 2009 LTIP and the applicable grant agreement as if his employment had continued through March 15, 2017. Mr. Johnson’s benefits under our Director and Executive Deferred Compensation Plan were fully vested as of the date of his retirement, with such amounts to be paid in accordance with the terms of that plan. Mr. Johnson will also be paid consulting fees at the rate of $8,700 per day for each day he provides consulting services during the period through June 30, 2014.

John T. McCormack. Mr. McCormack served as McDermott’s Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from June 2011 until his retirement in October 2013. In determining Mr. McCormack’s compensation, the Compensation Committee considered market data from the 2013 Proxy Peer Group as the primary reference and from the Survey Peer Group as a secondary reference. Mr. McCormack’s total target direct compensation for 2011,2013 is summarized below:

 

    Annual Base Salary 

Annual Incentive

(% of Salary)

 Long-Term Incentive

Approved Compensation

  $576,800 80% $1,250,000

Percentage of Market(1)

  90% 113% 92%

Percentage of Target TDC

  25% 20% 55%

 

(1)

Market = Median target for each compensation element based on the 2013 Proxy Peer Group. 100% represents median compensation.

Mr. McCormack received a 2.91% annual base salary increase in 2013, while his annual incentive target award remained unchanged. The Compensation Committee approved long-term incentives for Mr. McCormack with a target value of $1,250,000, which represented a decrease of 17% from the target value of long-term incentives awarded to Mr. McCormack in 2012. Performance-based compensation represented 61% of Mr. McCormack’s total target direct compensation. This consisted of Mr. McCormack’s target value annual incentive compensation and the 75% of his target value of long-term incentive compensation that was attributable to performance shares and stock options.

In connection with his retirement, we entered into entered into a separation agreement with Mr. McCormack providing for various compensation-related benefits in exchange for, among other things, his agreement to provide post-retirement consulting services and comply with several restrictive covenants, including covenants-not-to-compete. Under that separation agreement, all outstanding stock options, RSU awards and performance share awards held by Mr. McCormack that were not vested but would, absent his retirement from employment, remain outstanding and, to the extent applicable, continue to vest through October 31, 2015 will remain in full force and effect and, to the extent applicable, continue to vest and be settled in accordance with the terms of the 2009 LTIP and the applicable grant agreements as if Mr. McCormack’s employment had continued through October 31, 2015; provided that each such RSU award would vest and be settled on the earlier to occur of March 15, 2014 or the next anniversary of the grant date (as set forth in the applicable award agreement). All vested stock options held by Mr. McCormack will continue to be exercisable until the stated maximum expiration date in the applicable grant agreement, notwithstanding any provision thereof providing for earlier termination in the event of termination of employment. Mr. McCormack will also be paid consulting fees at the rate of $4,500 per day for each day he provides consulting services during the period through April 30, 2014.

Stewart A. Mitchell. Mr. Mitchell served as McDermott’s Senior Vice President and General Manager, Middle East from May 2013 to September 2013, and Middle East & Atlantic from October 2013 until January 2014. In determining Mr. Mitchell’s compensation, the Compensation Committee considered market data from the 2013 Proxy Peer Group as the primary reference for his annual base salary and long-term incentives and from the Survey Peer Group as the primary reference for his annual incentives. Mr. Mitchell’s total target direct compensation for 2013 is summarized below:

 

    Annual Base Salary(1) 

Annual Incentive

(% of Salary)

 Long-Term Incentive

Approved Compensation

  $450,000 70% $1,000,000

Percentage of Market(2)

  88% 113% 94%

Percentage of Target TDC

  26% 18% 57%

 

(1)

While the Compensation Committee set Mr. Mitchell’s annual base salary at $450,000, as an expatriate employee, Mr. Mitchell’s base salary earned during 2013 reflects deductions taken under McDermott’s tax equalization program applicable to expatriate employees, resulting in annual base salary earned of $320,924.    .

(2)

Market = Median target for each compensation element based on the 2013 Proxy Peer Group. 100% represents median compensation.

Mr. Mitchell received increases in each element of his total direct compensation was withinto bring each element of total direct compensation closer to market range. The valuerange and to reflect his appointment to our Executive Leadership Team during 2013. Performance-based compensation represented 60% of Mr. McCormack’sMitchell’s total target direct compensation. This consisted of Mr. Mitchell’s target value annual incentive compensation and the 75% of his target value of long-term incentive compensation following his promotionthat was attributable to EVP, COO was also set below market rangeperformance shares and stock options. As we previously announced, Mr. Mitchell resigned in lightJanuary 2014 to pursue other business opportunities.

2013 Other Compensation Elements

Retention Grants. At its meeting held in February 2013, the Compensation Committee approved a retention grant for certain executive officers, including Messrs. Cummins and Mitchell and Ms. Hinrichs, each with an approximate grant date fair value of $500,000. These retention grants were made as restricted stock units pursuant to the 2009 LTIP and generally provide for 100% vesting on the second anniversary of the Compensation Committee’s view that a newly promoted Chief Operating Officer should receive competitive compensation, although not necessarily equal to the compensation of a more experienced officer in a similar position.

As of December 31, 2011, (1) the estimated payout as a percent of target for the performance shares granted in 2011 was 0%, and (2) the share price of our common stock had not exceeded the strike price of the stock options granted in 2011. However, the amount of performance shares granted in 2011 that ultimately vest, if any, will be determined by reference to our total shareholder return over three-, four- and five-year periods. The vesting of these performance shares would impact the future realizable value of these performance shares. In addition, an increase in our stock price compared to our stock price at December 31, 2011 may impact the future realizable value of the stock options granted in 2011.

Sizing Long-Term Incentive Compensation.    The Compensation Committee generally determines the size of equity-basedgrant date. Similar retention grants as a dollar value, rather than granting a targeted number of shares. The number of restricted stock units performance sharesin varying amounts were made to other officers and stock options granted can be expressed throughkey employees in September 2012 and August 2013. The Compensation Committee determined those grants were appropriate in consideration of, among other things, the following formula:

targetdecreased retentive value of target long-term incentive($)/FMV($).previous years’ equity grants.

The fair market value of one restricted stock unit was computed based on the full fair market value of McDermott’s common stock based on the closing price of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the date of grant. The fair market value of one performance share was determined by Pay Governance using a Monte Carlo valuation model and the fair market value of an option to acquire one share of our common stock was determined by Pay Governance using a Black-Scholes model. Both of these valuation models consider the full fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant in conjunction with other valuation inputs. Full fair market value may differ from grant date fair value dependent on the analysis performed under Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718.

For example, for the long-term incentive compensation granted to the Continuing Named Executives in March 2011, the fair market value of our common stock as of the date the grants were determined (based on the closing price of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange) was $25.64, compared to the value of $35.38 for each performance share and the value of $10.19 for an option to acquire one share of our common stock. Because the long-term incentive compensation grants vest over three years, the number of shares calculated was rounded to the nearest multiple of three.

Timing of Equity GrantsPerquisites..    To avoid timing equity grants ahead of the release of material non-public information, the Compensation Committee generally grants stock option and other equity awards effective as of the first day of the next open trading window following the meeting at which the grants are approved, which is generally the third NYSE trading day following the filing of our annual report on Form 10-K or quarterly report on Form 10-Q with the SEC. This practice was followed for all long-term incentive compensation grants to Continuing Named Executives in 2011.

Perquisites

We provide a limited number of perquisites and other personal benefits to our Named Executives. In 20112013, our Compensation Committee adopted a perquisite allowance for certain officers, including our Named Executives,NEOs, in the amount of $20,000.$20,000, consistent with 2011 and 2012. Mr. Dickson did not receive a perquisite allowance in 2013 since he joined the Company in October 2013. The perquisite allowance was provided in ordercash and may be used for any purpose determined by the recipient, including to cover company-required physicals, financial planning and non-company-requiredis in lieu of any reimbursements made by McDermott to those executive officers receiving the perquisite allowance for any individual perquisite, with the exception of any company-required spousal travel.travel for (1) the Chief Executive Officer, and (2) the remaining NEOs, as approved by the Chief Executive Officer.

Additionally, and consistent with our past practice, we may reimburse Named Executives for the travel expenses of a guest accompanying a Named Executive, including the provision ofprovide a gross-up for any imputed income related to such company-required spousal travel, but only when the presence of that guestthe spouse is related to the underlying business purpose of the trip. We also provide our Named ExecutivesNEOs with a tax gross-up on any relocation-related expense reimbursements that may be subject to tax.

Retirement PlansExpatriate Benefits. McDermott provides benefits to our expatriate employees, which benefits are designed to relocate and support employees who are sent on an assignment outside of their home country. Expatriate benefits generally include an expatriate premium equal to 15% of the employee’s base salary, a hardship premium in certain countries, a housing allowance (or company provided housing in certain locations), certain cash allowances recognizing differences in living conditions in the host location, a vacation allowance based on the cost of an economy plane ticket to the employee’s home location, an education allowance for the employee’s dependent children, a car lease paid directly by McDermott (for certain key employees) and a tax equalization program.

Under McDermott’s tax equalization program, we ensure that expatriates are subject to the same tax liability as they would have paid in the United States. Each expatriate employee is responsible for a theoretical U.S. tax liability based on an estimate of the executive officer’s anticipated U.S. tax liability, and McDermott is responsible for any assignment country taxes in excess of that amount. We deduct hypothetical taxes from the expatriate’s compensation during the tax year and pay any assignment

country taxes on their behalf. Messrs. Cummins and Mitchell each participated in expatriate benefits in 2013, as Mr. Cummins is an Australian citizen based in Singapore and Mr. Mitchell is a United Kingdom citizen and was based in Dubai, U.A.E.

Thrift PlanDefined Contribution Plans.. We provide retirement benefits for most of our U.S. based employees, including our Named Executives,U.S. based NEOs, through sponsorship of the McDermott Thrift Plan, a qualified defined contribution 401(k) plan, which we refer to as our “Thrift Plan.” We provide retirement benefits for our non-U.S. expatriate employees, including Messrs. Cummins and Mitchell, through sponsorship of a global defined contribution plan, which we refer to as the “McDermott Global Defined Contribution Plan.”

Retirement and Excess PlansPlans..    Some We do not provide defined benefit pension plans to any of our longer-term U.S. employees, including Mr. NesserNEOs, with the exception of Messrs. Cummins and Mitchell and Ms. Hinrichs, are entitled toHinrichs. Messrs. Cummins and Mitchell were eligible for participation under the J. Ray McDermott, S.A. Third Country National Employees Pension Plan (the “TCN Plan”), which provides retirement benefits for certain of our current and former foreign employees. The TCN Plan was closed to new participants in 2011, and benefit accruals under the TCN Plan were frozen effective December 31, 2011. Ms. Hinrichs was eligible for participation under the McDermott (U.S.) Retirement Plan the qualified defined benefit pension plan we sponsor, which we refer to as our “Retirement Plan.” The(the “U.S. Retirement Plan has beenPlan”) before it was closed to new participants since 2006, and benefitin 2006. Benefit accruals under the U.S. Retirement Plan were frozen altogether in 2010.

We Ms. Hinrichs is also sponsor ana participant in our unfunded, nonqualified excess retirement plan which we refer to as our “Excess Plan.” The(the “U.S. Excess PlanPlan”), which covers a small group of highly compensated employees including Mr. Nesser and Ms. Hinrichs, whose ultimate benefits under the U.S. Retirement Plan are reduced by Internal Revenue Code limits on the amount of benefits which may be provided under qualified plans and the amount of compensation which may be taken into account in computing benefits under qualified plans. Benefits under the Excess Plan are paid from our general assets. As is the case with the U.S. Retirement Plan, benefits under the U.S. Excess Plan have been frozen since 2010, and no further benefits are accruing to Ms. Hinrichs or Mr. Nesser under the Excess Plan.

Messrs. Johnson, Elders, and Carlson do not participate in the Retirement Plan or the Excess Plan because their employment with McDermott commenced after new participation in the Retirement Plan was closed. Mr. McCormack does not participate in the Retirement Plan or the Excess Plan because he had not met the applicable eligibility requirements at the time the Retirement Plan was closed to new participants.2010.

See the “Pension Benefits” table under “Compensation of Executive Officers” below for more information regarding the TCN Plan, the U.S. Retirement Plan and the U.S. Excess Plan.

Deferred Compensation Plan. The Deferred Compensation Plan, or the DCP, is a defined contribution supplemental executive retirement plan established by our Board and the Compensation Committee to help maintain the competitiveness of our post-employment compensation as compared to our market. The Deferred Compensation PlanDCP is an unfunded, nonqualified plan that provides participantseach participant in the plan with benefits based on the participant’s notional account balance at the time of retirement or termination. Under the Deferred Compensation Plan,DCP, on an annual basis, the Compensation Committee has the discretion to credit a specified participant’s notional account

with an amount equal to a percentage of the participant’s prior-year base salary and annual bonus paid in the prior year. We refer to such credit as a “Company Contribution.” In 2011, Messrs. Johnson, McCormack and Nesser and Ms. Hinrichs2013, each of the NEOs, with the exception of Mr. Dickson, were participants in the Deferred Compensation PlanDCP and their respective accounts in the DCP received a Company Contribution in an amount equal to 5% of their respective prior-year base salaries and annual bonuses paid in the prior year. Messrs. Elders and Carlson were also participants and received (1)Mr. Dickson was not a Company Contributionparticipant in an amount equal to 5% of their respective prior-year base salary paid, and (2) a discretionary contribution equalthe DCP in value to 5% of their respective target bonuses for 2010 and the value of their respective prior-year target base salaries they would have earned for the period January 1, 2010 through their respective hire dates.2013.

The Compensation Committee has designated deemed mutual fund investments to serve as indices for the purpose of determining notional investment gains and losses to each participant’s account for any Company Contribution or participant electedparticipant-elected deferrals. Each participant allocates any Company Contributions and deferrals among the various deemed investments. Deferred Compensation PlanDCP benefits are based on the participant’s vested notional account balance at the time of retirement or termination. Please see the “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” table and accompanying narrative below for more information about the Deferred Compensation PlanDCP and Company Contributions to our Named Executives’ Deferred Compensation PlanNEOs’ DCP accounts.

Employment and Severance Arrangements

Employment and Separation Agreements. Except for change-in-control agreements described below, we do not currently have any employment or severance agreements with any of our Continuing Named Executives.NEOs relating to ongoing employment, with the exception of Mr. Cummins. Mr. Cummins has an employment agreement related to

In connection with Mr. Nesser’s retirement, a subsidiary

his status as an expatriate employee, which sets forth the expatriate benefits as discussed above under “Expatriate Benefits.” His employment agreement does not provide for any specified term of McDermott entered into a Separation Agreement with Mr. Nesser. Underemployment, and the terms of the Separation Agreement, Mr. Nesser was entitled to receive various payments and benefits under a Restructuring Transaction Retention Agreementthat agreement are generally consistent with those of employment agreements entered into between Mr. Nesser and a subsidiary ofwith various other McDermott in connection with the Spin-off. These payments and benefits included: (1) a cash payment of two times the sum of Mr. Nesser’s annual base salary and target EICP award; (2) a prorated target EICP award; (3) a cash payment equal to two years

of medical benefits; (4) earned but unused vacation; and (5) full vesting of Mr. Nesser’s outstanding equity awards granted in 2008 and 2009. In addition to those benefits, under the Separation Agreement, Mr. Nesser is treated as if he had continued to be an employee of McDermott for purposes of the vesting of an award of restricted stock units and stock options, which were granted to Mr. Nesser in 2010 and remained unvested as of the date of his Separation Agreement, in accordance with the vesting schedule of those awards.expatriate employees.

Additionally, under the Separation Agreement, Mr. Nesser provided general consulting and advisory services to McDermott for a period of six months following his retirement. In consideration of those services, Mr. Nesser received $25,000 per month, as well as reimbursement of reasonable expenses incurred by Mr. Nesser in rendering those services. See “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” below for more information on the payments made to and benefits received by Mr. Nesser under his Separation Agreement.

Change-in-Control Agreements. In our experience,We believe change-in-control agreements for certain executive officers are common within our industry, and our Board and the Compensation Committee believe that providing these agreements to our Named ExecutivesNEOs protects stockholders’ interests by helping to assure management continuity and focus through and beyond a change in control. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee has offered change-in-control agreements to key senior executives since 2005. Our change-in-control agreements generally provide a cash severance payment of two (2.99 for Mr. Johnson) times the sum of the Named Executive’s annual base salary and target EICP and a pro-rated bonus payment under the EICP. In addition, each such officer would become fully vested in any outstanding and unvested equity-based awards and his or her respective account balance in our Deferred Compensation Plan.

Our change-in-control agreements contain what is commonly referred to as a “double trigger,” that is, they provide benefits only upon an involuntary termination or constructive termination of the executive officer within one year following a change in control. The change-in-control agreements for our Continuing NEOs generally provide a cash severance payment of two (or 2.5 for Mr. Dickson) times the sum of the NEO’s annual base salary and target EICP and a pro-rated bonus payment under the EICP. In addition, upon a change in control, each such officer would become fully vested in any outstanding and unvested equity-based awards and his or her respective account balance in the DCP.

The change-in-control agreements: (1) do not provide for excise tax gross-ups; (2) require the applicable officer’s execution of a release prior to payment of certain benefits; and (3) provide for the potential reduction in payments to an applicable officer in order to avoid excise taxes.

Because he is no longer employed by McDermott, Mr. Nesser no longer has a Additionally, the change-in-control agreement with McDermott.Mr. Cummins expires on March 15, 2016. See the “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” table under “Compensation of Executive Officers” below and the accompanying disclosures for more information regarding the change-in-control agreements with our Continuing Named Executives,NEOs, as well as other plans and arrangements that have different trigger mechanisms that relate to a change in control.

Other Compensation Policies and Practices

Sizing Long-Term Incentive Compensation and Timing of Equity Grants. The Compensation Committee generally determines the size of equity-based grants as a dollar value, rather than granting a targeted number of shares, with each target value generally set within market range. To determine the number of restricted stock units and performance shares and shares underlying stock options granted, the target value of long-term incentive compensation is divided by the fair market value of the applicable component of equity.

The fair market value of one restricted stock unit was computed based on the full fair market value of McDermott’s common stock by reference to the closing price of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the date of grant. The fair market value of one performance share was determined by Pay Governance using a Monte Carlo valuation model. The fair market value of an option to acquire one share of our common stock was determined by Pay Governance using a Black-Scholes model. Both of these valuation models consider the full fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant in conjunction with other valuation inputs. Full fair market value may differ from grant date fair value as determined under Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718.

To avoid timing equity grants ahead of the release of material nonpublic information, the Compensation Committee generally grants equity awards effective as of the first day of the next open trading window following the meeting at which the grants are approved, which is generally the third NYSE trading day following the filing of our annual report on Form 10-K or quarterly report on Form 10-Q with the SEC. This practice was followed for all long-term incentive compensation grants to NEOs in 2013, with the exception of the restricted stock award granted to Mr. Dickson on the date he commenced employment with McDermott.

Stock Ownership Guidelines.To assist with the alignment of the interests of directors, executive officers and stockholders, we believe our directors and officers should have a significant financial stake in McDermott. To further that goal, we have adopted stock ownership guidelines in 2005, as amended effective August 9, 2010 and November 9, 2011, requiring generally that our nonemployee directors and our officers at the level of vice president or above maintain a minimum ownership interest in McDermott. The stock ownership requirements are as follows:

 

Chief Executive Officer — five times annual base salary;

Executive Officers directly reporting to the Chief Executive Officer — three times annual base salary;

Other Elected Vice Presidents — two times annual base salary; and

Nonemployee Directors — five times annual Board member retainer.

LevelBase Salary or Annual
Retainer Multiple

CEO

5x

Executive Officer directly reporting to CEO

3x

Other Elected Vice Presidents

2x

Nonemployee Directors

5x

Directors and officers have five years from the effective date of the amended stock ownership guidelines (as amended in August 2010), their initial election as a director/officer, or a change in position which increases the expected ownership level, whichever is later, to comply with

the guidelines. The Governance Committee reviews each director’s and officer’s progress towardsAll NEOs currently meet or exceed their ownership requirement or are within the requirements of the stock ownership guidelines annually, and may waive or modify the stock ownership guidelines for directors and officers in the Governance Committee’s sole discretion.five-year period to achieve compliance.

Derivatives Trading and Hedging. McDermott’s Insider Trading Policy prohibits all directors, officers and employees, including our Continuing Named Executives,NEOs, from engaging in “short sales” or trading in puts, calls or other options on McDermott’s common stock. Additionally, directors, officers and employees are prohibited from engaging in hedging transactions and from holding McDermott shares in a margin account or pledging McDermott shares as collateral for a loan.

Clawback Policy. OurIn August 2013, our Compensation Committee has adopted a revised clawback policy. The revised policy provides that if the consolidated financial statements of McDermott are materially restated within three years of their initial filing, and the Compensation Committee determines, in its reasonable discretion, that any current or former executive officer has engaged in intentional misconduct, and such misconduct caused or partially caused the need for such restatement, the Compensation Committee may, within 12 months after such a material restatement, require that the executive forfeit and/or return to McDermott all or a portion of the compensation vested, awarded or received under any bonus award, equity award or other award during the period subject to restatement and the 12-month period following the initial filing of the financial statements that were restated. The forfeiture and/or return of compensation under the policy would be limited to any portion that the executive officer would not have received if the consolidated financial statements had been reported properly at the time of their initial filing. The clawback policy would not apply to restatements occurring as a result of a change in control, as defined in the DCP, and the policy does not limit the ability of McDermott to pursue forfeiture or reclamation of amounts under which McDermott would seek to recover any incentive-based award granted to any executive officer as required by the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act or any other “clawback” provision required by law or the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange.applicable law.

Forfeiture Provisions.Additionally, consistent with our recent practice, our grant agreements for awards made in 20112013 contain a forfeiture provision. In 2011,2013, this provision provided that, in the event that, while the grantee is employed by McDermott or performing services on behalf of McDermott under any consulting agreement, the grantee is convicted of a misdemeanor involving fraud, dishonesty or moral turpitude or a felony, or the grantee engages in conduct that adversely affects or, in the sole judgment of the Compensation Committee, may reasonably be expected to adversely affect, the business reputation or economic interests of the Company,our company, then all rights and benefits awarded under the respective agreements are immediately forfeited, terminated and withdrawn.

2011 PEER GROUPS2013 PEER GROUPS

2013 Proxy Peer Group:

 

Proxy Peer Group:

Baker Hughes Incorporated

 FMC Technologies, Inc. National Oilwell Varco, Inc.

Cal Dive International, Inc.

 Global Industries Ltd. 1Halliburton Company Noble Corporation plc

Cameron International Corporation

 Halliburton CompanyHelix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. Oceaneering International, Inc.

Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V.

 Helix Energy SolutionsJacobs Engineering Group, Inc. Oil States International, Inc.

Dresser-Rand Group, Inc.

 Jacobs Engineering Group,KBR, Inc. Shaw Group,Tidewater Inc.

Foster Wheeler AG

 KBR, Inc.Tidewater Inc.
Survey Peer Group: 

2013 Survey Peer Group:

Ameron International Corporation

Fluor CorporationOwens Corning

Anadarko Petroleum Corporation

The Goodyear Tire & Rubber CompanyOwens-Illinois, Inc.

A.O. Smith Corporation

Graco Inc.Parker Hannifin Corporation

Ball Corporation

Greif, Inc.Parsons Corporation

Barnes Group, Inc.

HD Supply, Inc.Pittsburgh Corning Corporation

Beam, Inc.

Herman Miller, Inc.Polymer Group, Inc.

Bemis Company, Inc.

Hess CorporationPolyOne Corporation

BG US Services

HNTB CorporationPulteGroup, Inc.

Bovis Lend Lease International Ltd.

Holcim Ltd.Saudi Arabian Oil Co.

BP p.l.c.

Hunt Consolidated, Inc.SCA Americas, Inc.

Brady Corporation

Husky Injection Molding Systems Ltd.Schlumberger Limited

Building Materials Corporation of America

Illinois Tool Works Inc.Sealed Air Corp.

Calgon Carbon Corporation

Ingersoll Rand plcShell Oil Company

Cameron International Corporation

ION Geophysical CorporationSimpson Manufacturing Company, Inc.

Caterpillar Inc.

Irving Oil Commercial G.P.Sonoco Products Co.

Cemex Internacional S.AS.A. de C.V.

ITT CorporationSpectra Energy Corp

Chevron Corporation

Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.SPX Corporation

CH2M Hill Companies, Ltd.

KBR, Inc.Stantec Inc.

Cimarex Energy Co.

Key Energy Services, Inc.Sunoco, Inc.

Connell Limited Partnership

Koch Industries, Inc.Swagelok Company

ConocoPhillips

Lafarge North America Inc.Terex Corporation

Cooper Industries plc

L.B. Foster CompanyTesoro Corporation

Corning Incorporated

Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P.Textron Inc.

DCP Midstream LLC

MAG Industrial Automation Systems LLCThermadyne Industries, Inc.

Deere & Company

The Manitowoc Company, Inc.Thomas & Betts Corporation

Devon Energy Corporation

Marathon Oil Corporation3M Company

Donaldson Company, Inc.

Matthews International CorporationThe Timken Company

Eaton Corporation

MeadWestvaco CorporationThe Toro Company

EMCOR Group, Inc.

Milacron LLCTrinity Industries, Inc.

Exterran Holdings, Inc.

Mine Safety Appliances CompanyUnifi, Inc.

Exxon Mobil Corporation

Murphy Oil CorporationUSG Corporation

Ferrovial, S.A.

MWH Global, Inc.Valero Energy Corporation

Flowserve Corporation

Fluor Corporation

The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company

Graco Inc.

Greif, Inc.

HD Supply, Inc.

Herman Miller, Inc.

Hess Corporation

HNTB Corporation

Holcim Ltd.

Hunt Consolidated, Inc.

Husky Injection Molding Systems Ltd.

Illinois Tool Works Inc.

Ingersoll Rand plc

ION Geophysical Corporation

Irving Oil Commercial G.P.

ITT Corporation

Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.

KBR, Inc.

Key Energy Services, Inc.

Koch Industries, Inc.

Lafarge North America Inc.

L.B. Foster Company

Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P.

MAG Industrial Automation Systems LLC

The Manitowoc Company, Inc.

Marathon Oil Corporation

Matthews International Corporation

MeadWestvaco Corporation

Milacron LLC

Mine Safety Appliances Company

Murphy Oil Corporation

MWH Global, Inc.

Occidental Petroleum Corporation

Owens Corning

Owens-Illinois, Inc.

Parker Hannifin Corporation

Parsons Corporation

Pittsburgh Corning Corporation

Polymer Group, Inc.

PolyOne Corporation

PulteGroup, Inc.

Saudi Arabian Oil Co.

SCA Americas, Inc.

Schlumberger Limited

Sealed Air Corporation

Shell Oil Company

Simpson Manufacturing Company, Inc.

Sonoco Products Co.

Spectra Energy Corp

SPX Corporation

Stantec Inc.

Sunoco, Inc.

Swagelok Company

Terex Corporation

Tesoro Corporation

Textron Inc.

Thermadyne Industries, Inc.

Thomas & Betts Corporation

3M Company

The Timken Company

The Toro Company

Trinity Industries, Inc.

Unifi, Inc.

USG Corporation

Valero Energy Corporation

Watts Water Technologies, Inc.

1 Global Industries Ltd. was acquired by Technip S.A. in December 2011.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORTCOMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

We have reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with McDermott’s management and, based on our review and discussions, we recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Thomas C. Schievelbein,Mary L. Shafer-Malicki, Chairman

Roger A. Brown

Mary L. Shafer-MalickiGary P. Luquette

David A. Trice

COMPENSATIONCOMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table summarizes the prior three years’ compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer, our three highest paid executive officers who did not serve as our CEO and CFO during 20112013 and were employed by McDermott as of December 31, 2011,2013, our former Chief Executive Officer (who served until December 16, 2013) and Mr. Nesser, who would have been one of our three highest paid executive officers but for the fact that he was not employed by McDermott as of Decemberformer Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer (who served until October 31, 2011. We refer to these persons as our Named Executives.2013). No compensation information is provided for Mr. EldersMessrs. Dickson, Cummins or Mitchell for 2009 because he joined2011 or 2012, as they were not previously included as “named executive officers” in our companyproxy statements for our annual meetings of stockholders in 2010, and no information is provided for Mr. Carlson2012 or Ms. Hinrichs for 2009 because they did not become Named Executives until 2010 or for Mr. McCormack for 2009 or 2010 because he did not become a Named Executive until 2011.2013.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLESUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

 

Name and Principal
Position
 Year  Salary  Bonus  

Stock

Awards(1)

  

Option

Awards(1)

  

Non-Equity

Incentive Plan

Compensation(2)

  

Change in

Pension

Value and

Nonqualified

Deferred

Compensation

Earnings(3)

  

All Other

Compensation(4)

  Total 

S.M. Johnson

President and Chief

Executive Officer

  2011   $942,500   $0   $3,382,092   $944,089   $0    N/A   $132,099   $5,400,780  
  2010   $827,083   $0   $2,672,142   $865,313   $1,218,863    N/A   $163,683   $5,747,084  
  2009   $562,500   $0   $2,664,402   $1,435,394   $1,131,563    N/A   $83,929   $5,877,788  

P.L. Elders

  2011   $481,250   $0   $845,428   $236,000   $0    N/A   $76,763   $1,639,441  

Senior Vice President

and Chief Financial

Officer

  2010   $315,114   $0   $517,021   $396,788   $398,146    N/A   $14,059   $1,641,128  
  2009    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A  

G.L. Carlson

Senior Vice President

and Chief

Administration Officer

  2011   $332,000   $0   $354,863   $94,406   $0    N/A   $120,619   $901,888  
  2010   $243,333   $0   $527,051   $165,771   $334,400    N/A   $106,850   $1,377,405  
  2009    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A  

L.K. Hinrichs

Senior Vice President,

General Counsel and

Corporate Secretary

  2011   $435,575   $0   $792,653   $212,421   $0   $76,760   $77,550   $1,594,959  
  2010   $419,225   $0   $1,054,526   $276,912   $317,673   $121,620   $37,286   $2,227,242  
  2009    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A  

J.T. McCormack

Executive Vice

President, Chief

Operating Officer

  2011   $447,381   $0   $915,194   $253,847   $0    N/A   $70,870   $1,687,292  
  2010    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A  
  2009    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A  

J.T. Nesser

Former Executive

Vice President, Chief

Operating Officer

  2011   $296,828   $0   $0   $0   $206,408   $163,357   $2,034,893   $2,701,486  
  2010   $509,381   $0   $1,196,240   $224,998   $609,729   $160,951   $43,383   $2,744,682  
  2009   $500,000   $0   $418,899   $235,945   $595,000   $155,330   $93,156   $1,998,330  

 

 
Name and Principal Position Year  Salary(1)  Bonus(2)  

Stock

Awards(3)

  

Option

Awards(3)

  

Non-Equity

Incentive Plan

Compensation(4)

  

Change in

Pension

Value and

Nonqualified

Deferred

Compensation

Earnings(5)

  

All Other

Compensation(6)

  Total 

Mr. Dickson

President and Chief

Executive Officer

  2013   $144,618   $480,000   $3,799,998   $0   $0    N/A   $4,339   $4,428,955  
         
         

Mr. Johnson

Former President and

Chief Executive Officer

  2013   $976,250   $0   $3,749,954   $1,249,991   $0    N/A   $82,229   $6,058,424  
  2012   $950,000   $0   $3,749,979   $1,249,999   $760,000    N/A   $142,547   $6,852,525  
  2011   $942,500   $0   $3,382,092   $944,089   $0    N/A   $132,099   $5,400,780  

Mr. Elders

Senior Vice President

and Chief Financial

Officer

  2013   $511,250   $0   $824,966   $274,995   $0    N/A   $59,987   $1,671,198  
  2012   $493,750   $0   $1,012,436   $337,499   $207,383    N/A   $78,970   $2,130,038  
  2011   $481,250   $0   $845,428   $236,000   $0    N/A   $76,763   $1,639,441  
         

Mr. McCormack

Former Executive

Vice President and

Chief Operating Officer

  2013   $478,651   $0   $937,470   $312,490   $0    N/A   $73,142   $1,801,753  
  2012   $535,000   $0   $1,124,910   $374,987   $308,208    N/A   $73,828   $2,416,933  
  2011   $447,381   $0   $915,194   $253,847   $0    N/A   $70,870   $1,687,292  
         

Mr. Cummins

  2013   $320,924   $0   $1,249,980   $249,998   $0   $0   $717,940   $2,538,842  

Executive Vice

         

President, Offshore

         

Ms. Hinrichs

Senior Vice President,

General Counsel and

Corporate Secretary

  2013   $472,063   $0   $1,324,966   $274,995   $0   $0   $56,998   $2,129,022  
  2012   $448,750   $0   $749,955   $249,992   $301,573   $103,766   $71,995   $1,926,031  
  2011   $435,575   $0   $792,653   $212,421   $0   $76,760   $77,550   $1,594,959  
         

Mr. Mitchell

  2013   $320,924   $0   $1,249,980   $249,998   $0   $0   $252,463   $2,073,365  

Former Senior Vice

         

President and General

         

Manager, Middle East

         

& Atlantic

         

 

 

 

(1)

The amounts reported in this column for 2013 for Messrs. Dickson and McCormack represent partial-year service. The amounts reported for Messrs. Cummins and Mitchell reflect amounts received by Messrs. Cummins and Mitchell after deductions were taken under our tax equalization program. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — 2013 Other Compensation Elements — Expatriate Benefits” for a discussion of that program.

(2)

The amount reported in this column represents a cash signing bonus for Mr. Dickson, which was intended to compensate him for benefits from his former employer that he would have received if he had not changed employment.

(3)

The amounts reported in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of stock awards or option awards, as applicable, granted to each Named ExecutiveNEO and computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The value of the performance share awards at the grant date assuming that the highest level of performance conditions will be achieved is as follows: Mr. Johnson — $4,945,687; Mr. Elders — $1,088,038; Mr. McCormack — $1,236,406; Mr. Cummins — $989,133; Ms. Hinrichs — $1,088,038; and Mr. Mitchell — $989,133. See the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table for more information regarding the stock awards and option awards we granted in 2011.2013.

(2)(4)

The amounts reported in this column are attributable to the annual incentive awards earned in fiscal years 2009, 2010 and 2011,year 2012 but paid in 2010, 2011 and 2012, respectively. The amount reported for Mr. Nesser is his 2011 target EICP award, prorated to take into account his length of service in 2011. See the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table for more information regarding the annual incentive awards earned in 2011.2013.

(3)(5)

The amounts reported in this column represent the changes in actuarial present values of the accumulated benefits under defined benefit plans, determined by comparing the prior completed fiscal year end amount to the covered fiscal year end amount. No value is reported for 2013 for each of Mr. Cummins, Ms. Hinrichs and Mr. Mitchell, as the change in actuarial present value of their accumulated benefits from fiscal year end 2012 to fiscal year end 2013 was ($80,000), ($53,630) and ($64,000), respectively. The actuarial present values decreased as a result of a change in assumptions used in computing the present values in each year, namely an increase in the discount rate from 4% to 4.8%.

(4)(6)

The amounts reported in this column for 20112013 are attributable to the following:

All Other Compensation

 

   

Deferred

Compensation Plan

Contribution(A)

  Thrift  Match(B)  Service-Based
Thrift
Contribution(B)
  Perquisites(C)  Tax
Gross-Ups(D)
  Other(E) 

S. M. Johnson

 $97,932   $6,817   $7,350   $20,000          

P. L. Elders

 $39,950   $7,350   $7,350   $20,000       $2,113  

G. L. Carlson

 $24,800   $6,030   $7,350   $68,606   $11,720   $2,113  

L. K. Hinrichs

 $43,511   $6,689   $7,350   $20,000          

J. T. McCormack

 $36,170   $7,350   $7,350   $20,000          

J. T. Nesser

 $55,219   $6,608   $7,350   $21,525       $1,944,191  

 

    

Deferred

Compensation
Plan

Contribution(A)

   Thrift
Match(B)
   Service-Based
Thrift
Contribution(B)
   Perquisite
Allowance(C)
   Expatriate
Benefits(D)
   Other(E)   Tax
Payments(F)

Mr. Dickson

   —       $0     $4,339     $0     N/A     $0    $0

Mr. Johnson

   $47,500     $7,079     $7,650     $20,000     N/A     $0    $0

Mr. Elders

   $24,687     $7,650     $7,650     $20,000     N/A     $0    $0

Mr. McCormack

   $26,750     $7,650     $7,650     $20,000     N/A     $11,092    $0

Mr. Cummins

   $18,750     N/A     N/A     $12,080     $447,284     $0    $209,826

Ms. Hinrichs

   $22,437     $7,650     $7,650     $20,000     N/A     $0    $0

Mr. Mitchell

   $18,750     N/A     N/A     $12,080     $221,633     $0    $0

 

 

 (A)

The amounts reported in this column are attributable to contributions made by McDermott under the Deferred Compensation Plan.

 (B)

The amounts reported in these columns are attributable to contributions made under our defined contribution plan, which we refer to as our Thrift Plan. Messrs. Cummins and Mitchell are not participants in the Thrift Plan.

 (C)

The amounts reported in this column are attributable to a lump-sum perquisite allowance in the amount of $20,000 received by certain officers of McDermott in 2011,2013, including each of the Named Executives.NEOs with the exception of Mr. Dickson. The amounts reported for Messrs. Cummins and Mitchell reflect amounts received by Messrs. Cummins and Mitchell after deductions were taken under our tax equalization program described above ($7,920 for each of Messrs. Cummins and Mitchell). With the exception of an executive physical required by McDermott, the perquisite allowance was permitted to be used for any purpose determined by the recipient. Additionally, the amount reported for Mr. Carlson includes $48,606 attributable to the costs of providing him relocation assistance in connection with his move from Colorado to Texas. The amount reported for Mr. Nesser includes a gift in connection with his retirement from McDermott.

 (D)The amount reported in this column for Mr. Carlson is attributable to tax gross-ups associated with income imputed to him as a result of amounts we paid to Mr. Carlson by reason of expenses he incurred in connection with his relocation.
(E)

The amounts reported in this column for Messrs. Elders and Carlson2013 are attributable to the costfollowing:

 

    Expatriate
Premium
   Hardship
Premium
   Commodities
& Service
Allowance
   Housing
& Utilities
Allowance
   Vacation
Airfare
   Education
Allowance
   Car Lease

Mr. Cummins

   $66,000     $5,531     $105,726     $225,948     $12,331     $25,693    $36,055

Mr. Mitchell

   $66,000     $32,750     $49,554     $25,625     $4,973     $42,731    N/A

 

Any amounts for Mr. Cummins paid in Singapore dollars (SGD) were converted to McDermottU.S. dollars (USD) using an average exchange rate for the Named Executive’s spouse to accompany the Named Executive, at McDermott’s request, to attend the 2011 Annual Meeting2013 of Stockholders1.2481 SGD per USD. All amounts for Mr. Mitchell were paid in Panama City, Panama. USD.

(E)

The amount reported in this column represents payment for vacation earned but not taken by Mr. Nesser is attributable to: (1) payments made pursuant to Mr. Nesser’s Separation Agreement consisting of (a) a cash severance payment in the amount of $1,742,527, (b) two times the full annual cost of coverage for medical, dental and vision benefits in the amount of $35,127, (c) unused vacation for 2011 in the amount of $39,424 and (d) consulting fees in the amount of $125,000; and (2) the cost to McDermott for Mr. Nesser’s spouse to accompany him, at McDermott’s request, to attend the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders in Panama City, Panama in the amount of $2,113. For more information regarding Mr. Nesser’s Separation Agreement, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Employment and Severance Arrangements — Employment and Separation Agreements” above.McCormack during 2013.

 

(F)

The amount reported in this column consists of an estimated $209,826 in Singapore taxes to be paid by McDermott on behalf of Mr. Cummins pursuant to McDermott’s tax equalization program. The amount was converted from SGD to USD using the January 2014 monthly exchange rate of 1.2547 SGD per USD. There were no assignment country taxes paid by McDermott on behalf of Mr. Mitchell during 2013.

GRANTSGRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS PLAN-BASED AWARDS

The following Grants of Plan-Based Awards table provides additional information about stock awards and equity and non-equity incentive plan awards we granted to our Named ExecutivesNEOs during the year ended December 31, 2011.2013.

 

Name

 Grant Date  Committee
Action
Date
  Estimated Possible Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1)
 Estimated Future Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2)
 

All Other

Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of

Stock

or Units(3)

 All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options(4)
 Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
 Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock and
Option
Awards(5)
 
   Threshold Target Maximum Threshold
(#)
 

Target

(#)

 Maximum
(#)
    

S.M. Johnson

            

EICP

  02/28/11    02/28/11   $115,469 $942,603 $1,885,205          

PShares

  03/04/11    02/28/11      28,265 56,529 113,058    $2,382,132  

RSUs

  03/04/11    02/28/11         39,000   $999,960  

Stock Options

  03/04/11    02/28/11          98,133 $25.64 $944,089  

P.L. Elders

            

EICP

  02/28/11    02/28/11   $41,272 $336,911 $673,822          

PShares

  03/04/11    02/28/11      7,065 14,130 28,260    $595,438  

RSUs

  03/04/11    02/28/11         9,750   $249,990  

Stock Options

  03/04/11    02/28/11          24,531 $25.64 $236,000  

G.L. Carlson

            

EICP

  02/28/11    02/28/11   $24,406 $199,233 $398,466          

PShares

  03/04/11    02/28/11      2,826 5,652 11,304    $238,175  

RSUs

  03/04/11    02/28/11         4,551   $116,688  

Stock Options

  03/04/11    02/28/11          9,813 $25.64 $94,406  

L.K. Hinrichs

            

EICP

  02/28/11    02/28/11   $32,019 $261,381 $522,763          

PShares

  03/04/11    02/28/11      6,359 12,717 25,434    $535,894  

RSUs

  03/04/11    02/28/11         10,014   $256,759  

Stock Options

  03/04/11    02/28/11          22,080 $25.64 $212,421  

J.T. McCormack

            

EICP

  02/28/11    02/28/11   $33,632 $274,549 $549,098          

PShares

  03/04/11    02/28/11      3,285 6,570 13,140    $276,860  

RSUs

  03/04/11    02/28/11         4,533   $116,226  

Stock Options

  03/04/11    02/28/11          11,406 $25.64 $109,731  

PShares

  05/13/11    05/06/11      5,637 11,274 22,548    $357,160  

RSUs

  05/13/11    05/06/11         8,058   $164,947  

Stock Options

  05/13/11    05/06/11          18,312 $20.47 $144,115  

J.T. Nesser

            

EICP

  02/28/11    02/28/11   $43,948 $358,756 $717,511          

 

 
        Estimated Possible Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Awards
(1)
  Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive Plan
Awards
(2)
  

All Other

Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of

Stock

or Units(3)

  All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(4)
  Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
  Grant Date
Fair
Value of
Stock and
Option
Awards
(5)
 

Name /

Award Type

 Grant
Date
  Committee
Action
Date
  Threshold  Target  Maximum  Threshold
(#)
  

Target

(#)

  Maximum
(#)
     

Mr. Dickson

            

RSA

  10/31/13    10/31/13    —      —      —      —      —      —      537,482    —      —     $3,799,998  

Mr. Johnson

            

EICP

  02/27/13    02/27/13   $244,092   $976,370   $1,952,740    —      —      —      —      —      —      —    

PShares

  03/05/13    02/27/13    —      —      —      79,084    236,071    472,142    —      —      —     $2,499,992  

RSUs

  03/05/13    02/27/13    —      —      —      —      —      —      119,044    —      —     $1,249,962  

NQSO

  03/05/13    02/27/13    —      —      —      —      —      —      —      257,730   $10.50   $1,249,991  

Mr. Elders

            

EICP

  02/27/13    02/27/13   $89,478   $357,911   $715,822    —      —      —      —      —      —      —    

PShares

  03/05/13    02/27/13    —      —      —      17,398    51,935    103,870    —      —      —     $549,992  

RSUs

  03/05/13    02/27/13    —      —      —      —      —      —      26,188    —      —     $274,974  

NQSO

  03/05/13    02/27/13    —      —      —      —      —      —      —      56,700   $10.50   $274,995  

Mr. McCormack

            

EICP

  02/27/13    02/27/13   $114,532   $458,126   $916,252    —      —      —      —      —      —      —    

PShares

  03/05/13    02/27/13    —      —      —      19,771    59,017    118,034    —      —      —     $624,990  

RSUs

  03/05/13    02/27/13    —      —      —      —      —      —      29,760    —      —     $312,480  

NQSO

  03/05/13    02/27/13    —      —      —      —      —      —      —      64,431   $10.50   $312,490  

Mr. Cummins

            

EICP

  02/27/13    02/27/13   $77,024   $308,096   $616,192    —      —      —      —      —      —      —    

PShares

  03/05/13    02/27/13    —      —      —      15,817    47,214    94,428    —      —      —     $499,996  

RSUs

  03/05/13    02/27/13    —      —      —      —      —      —      23,808    —      —     $249,984  

RSUs(6)

  03/05/13    02/27/13    —      —      —      —      —      —      47,619    —      —     $500,000  

NQSO

  03/05/13    02/27/13    —      —      —      —      —      —      —      51,546   $10.50   $249,998  

Ms. Hinrichs

            

EICP

  02/27/13    02/27/13   $82,625   $330,498   $660,997    —      —      —      —      —      —      —    

PShares

  03/05/13    02/27/13    —      —      —      17,398    51,935    103,870    —      —      —     $549,992  

RSUs

  03/05/13    02/27/13    —      —      —      —      —      —      26,188    —      —     $274,974  

RSUs(6)

  03/05/13    02/27/13    —      —      —      —      —      —      47,619    —      —     $500,000  

NQSO

  03/05/13    02/27/13    —      —      —      —      —      —      —      56,700   $10.50   $274,995  

Mr. Mitchell

            

EICP

  02/27/13    02/27/13   $77,024   $308,096   $616,192    —      —      —      —      —      —      —    

PShares

  03/05/13    02/27/13    —      —      —      15,817    47,214    94,428    —      —      —     $499,996  

RSUs

  03/05/13    02/27/13    —      —      —      —      —      —      23,808    —      —     $249,984  

RSUs(6)

  03/05/13    02/27/13    —      —      —      —      —      —      47,619    —      —     $500,000  

NQSO

  03/05/13    02/27/13    —      —      —      —      —      —      —      51,546   $10.50   $249,998  

 

 

 

(1)

This column reflects the threshold, target and maximum payout opportunities under the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan, or EICP. For 2011, theThe EICP awards for 2013 were based 70%100% on the attainment of financial goalsgoals. Mr. Johnson’s award was then subject to adjustment by the Compensation Committee, in its sole discretion, based on objectives established for Mr. Johnson by the Compensation Committee, and 30%the target award for the other NEOs was subject to adjustment by the Chief Executive Officer based on each NEO’s individual performance, with any such adjustment subject to the approval of the Compensation Committee. The attainment of individual goals. The 70%the financial componentgoals was based 70%100% on consolidated operating income and 30% on consolidated return on invested capital.income. The financial goals containcontained threshold, target and maximum performance levels which, if achieved, resultwould have resulted in payments of 25%, 100% and 200% of the financial component,, respectively. The threshold payout amount provided was determined based on achieving the threshold consolidated operating income threshold (or 12.25%25% of the target amounts shown), which, if not achieved, would result in no amounts being paid on an EICP award.

On February 28, 2011,On February 27, 2013, our Compensation Committee established target EICP awards expressed as a percentage of the Named Executive’s 2011 annual base salary earned, as follows: Mr. Johnson — 100%, Mr. Elders — 70%, Mr. Carlson — 60%, Ms. Hinrichs — 60%, Mr. McCormack — 50% and Mr. Nesser — 70%. With the exception of Mr. McCormack, the NEO’s 2013 annual base salary earned, as follows: Mr. Johnson — 100%, Mr. Elders — 70%, Mr. Cummins — 70%, Mr. Mitchell — 70%, Mr. McCormack — 80% and Ms. Hinrichs — 70%. Mr. Dickson was not a participant in the EICP during 2013. The target amounts shown were computed according to the following formula: Target % * [(2012 base salary * 90/365) + (2013 base salary * 275/365)]. No payouts were made under the EICP for any participant, including the NEOs, for 2013, as shown were computed according to the following formula: Target % * [(2010 base salary * 90/365) + (2011 base salary * 275/365)]. In connection with Mr. McCormack’s June 30, 2011 promotion to EVP, COO, on May 6, 2011 our Compensation Committee approved an increase in target EICP award for Mr. McCormack from 50% to 70% effective and for the period beginning June 30, 2011. Accordingly, the amount shown in Mr. McCormack’s target column reflects his target EICP award under his former and current positions, prorated based on the length of service in each position. The target amount shown for Mr. McCormack was computed according to the following formula: SVP Target % * [(2010 base salary * 90/365) + (2011 SVP base salary * 90/365)] + EVP, COO Target % * (2011 EVP, COO base salary * 185/365). The actual EICP payouts for the Named Executives for 2011 are provided in the Summary Compensation Table in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column.

(2)

This column reflects the target, threshold and maximum payout opportunities of grants of performance shares under the 2009 LTIP. Each grant represents the right to receive one share of McDermott common stock for each vested performance share. The amount of performance shares that vest, if any, is scheduled to initiallywill be determined on December 31, 2013 based on ourMcDermott’s return on invested capital (“ROIC”) against stated performance goals and total shareholder return (“TSR”) relative to an average of the 2013 Proxy Peer Group duringTSR as of December 31, 2015. ROIC will be calculated yearly over the same

measurement period with subsequent measurements(January 1, 2013 — December 31, 2015), and the average of total shareholder returnthese amounts will be used to determine McDermott’s performance. If the threshold ROIC performance goal is achieved, a number of performance shares between 50% and 150% of the target award may be earned. This ROIC award percentage is then modified by a multiple of 0.67x to 1.33x based on McDermott’s TSR relative to an average of the 2013 Proxy Peer Group on December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2015.TSR over the three year performance period. The amounts shown in the “threshold” column represent attainment of the numberthreshold ROIC Award Percentage of 50%, as modified by 0.67x, the lowest TSR modifier, resulting in 33.5% of the amount of performance shares that will vest, which is 50% of the amount granted and theactually vesting. The amounts shown in the “maximum” column represent the number of performance shares that will vest, which is 200%attainment of the amount granted, based on our total shareholder return relative tomaximum ROIC award percentage of 150%, as modified by 1.33x, the Proxy Peer Group. The maximum number of performance shares which will vest based on performance through December 31, 2013 is 150% of the amount granted if our total shareholder return ranksTSR modifier, resulting in the 75th percentile or higher relative to the Proxy Peer Group. A maximum of 200% of the amount of performance shares granted may vest based on performance through December 31, 2014 and 2015, less any amount previously vested.actually vesting. The following table providestables provide the measurement periods, total shareholder return percentile rankapplicable performance goals and corresponding vesting percentageequation for determining the number of the amount ofvested performance shares granted:shares:

 

Performance  Average ROIC  ROIC Award Percentage

Superior

  ³16%  150%

Target

  13%  100%

Threshold

  10%    50%

< Threshold

  <10%      0%

 

 

Measurement PeriodTotal Shareholder Return Performance  Total Shareholder Return
Percentile Rank
Vesting Percentage of
Performance Shares  Granted
TSR Modifier

36 Months Ending December 31, 2013> 15% above Peer Group Average

  1.33

³90th Percentile

     75th Percentile

     50th Percentile

     25th Percentile

< 25th PercentileWithin ±15% of Peer Group Average

  

150%

150%

100%

50%

0%

1.00

48 Months Ending December 31, 2014< 15% below Peer Group Average

  

³90th Percentile

     75th Percentile

     50th Percentile

     25th Percentile

< 25th Percentile

200%*

150%*

100%*

50%*

0%*

0.67

60 Months Ending December 31, 2015

³90th Percentile

     75th Percentile

     50th Percentile

     25th Percentile

< 25th Percentile

200%*

150%*

100%*

50%*

0%*

*Lessany amounts vested through prior measurement periods.

LOGO

 

(3)

This column reflects, for Mr. Dickson, an equity inducement award of restricted stock, and for all other NEOs, grants of restricted stock units under the 2009 LTIP. Each restricted stock unit represents the right to receive one share of McDermott common stock and is generally scheduled to vest in one-third increments on the first, second and third anniversaries of the date of grant. Upon vesting, the restricted stock units are converted into shares of McDermott common stock.

The equity inducement award of restricted stock to Mr. Dickson was not made under the 2009 LTIP, but the shares are generally subject to the same terms and conditions as would be applicable if the shares had been granted under the 2009 LTIP. The shares of restricted stock are scheduled to vest as follows, provided Mr. Dickson is still employed by McDermott on the vesting date:

DateShares Vesting

June 15, 2014

212,164       

June 15, 2015

108,439       

June 15, 2016

108,440       

June 15, 2017

108,439       

Excluding the restricted stock units discussed in footnote (4) below, each restricted stock unit represents the right to receive one share of McDermott common stock and is generally scheduled to vest in one-fourth increments on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the date of grant. Upon vesting, the restricted stock units are converted into shares of McDermott common stock.

 

(4)

This column reflects grants of non-qualified stock options under the 2009 LTIP. Each grant represents the right to purchase, at the exercise price, shares of McDermott common stock over a period of seven years. The stock options are generally scheduled to vest and become exercisable in one-third increments on the first, second and third anniversaries of the date of grant.

 

(5)

This column reflects the full grant date fair values of the equity awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Grant date fair values are determined using the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant for restricted stock and restricted stock units, a Monte Carlo simulation model for performance shares, and the Black-Scholes option pricing model for stock options. The Monte Carlo simulation model for performance shares and the Black-Scholes option pricing model for stock options each requires various assumptions, including but not limited toassumptions about the expected life of the award and stock return and stock price volatility. For more information regarding the compensation expense related to 20112013 awards, and a discussion of valuation assumptions utilized in performance share and option pricing, see Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements included in our annual report on formForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.2013.

 

(6)

These grants of restricted stock units represent retention restricted stock unit awards. Each such restricted stock unit represents the right to receive one share of McDermott common stock and is generally scheduled to vest 100% on the second anniversary of the date of grant. Upon vesting, the restricted stock units are converted into shares of McDermott common stock.

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDSOUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END FISCAL YEAR-END

The following Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End table summarizes the equity awards we have made to our Named ExecutivesNEOs which were outstanding as of December 31, 2011.2013.

 

 

Name

 

Grant
Date

  Option Awards(1)  Stock Awards
  

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options

Exercisable

  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
  

Equity
Incentive

Plan

Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options

  

Option

Exercise
Price

  Option
Expiration
Date
  

Number
of

Shares

or Units
of
Stock
That
Have

Not
Vested

  Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested(2)
  

Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or

Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested(3)

  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested(2)

Mr. Dickson

            

RSA(4)

  10/31/13          537,482   $4,923,335    —     —  

Mr. Johnson

            

NQSO

  05/14/09    255,744    —      —     $9.36    05/14/16       

NQSO

  03/04/10    141,597    —      —     $13.09    03/04/17       

NQSO

  03/04/11    65,422    32,711    —     $25.64    03/04/18       

NQSO

  03/05/12    59,952    119,904    —     $14.44    03/05/19       

NQSO

  03/05/13    —      257,730    —     $10.50    03/05/20       

RSUs(5)

  03/04/11          12,496   $114,463    —     —  

RSUs(5)

  03/05/12          55,466   $508,069    —     —  

RSUs(6)

  03/05/13          114,416   $1,048,051    —     —  

PShares

  03/04/11          —      —      28,265   $258,903

PShares

  03/05/12          —      —      54,230   $496,742

PShares

  03/05/13             79,084   $724,407

Mr. Elders

            

NQSO

  05/13/10    60,292    —      —     $13.37    05/13/17       

NQSO

  03/04/11    16,354    8,177    —     $25.64    03/04/18       

NQSO

  03/05/12    16,187    32,374    —     $14.44    03/05/19       

NQSO

  03/05/13    —      56,700    —     $10.50    03/05/20       

RSUs(5)

  03/04/11          3,250   $29,770    —     —  

RSUs(5)

  03/05/12          15,580   $142,713    —     —  

RSUs(6)

  03/05/13          26,188   $239,882    —     —  

PShares

  03/04/11          —      —      7,065   $64,715

PShares

  03/05/12          —      —      14,642   $134,116

PShares

  03/05/13          —      —      17,398   $159,368

Mr. McCormack

            

NQSO

  03/05/09    14,155    —      —     $5.64    03/05/16       

NQSO

  03/04/10    25,555    —      —     $13.09    03/04/17       

NQSO

  03/04/11    7,604    3,802    —     $25.64    03/04/18       

NQSO

  05/13/11    12,208    6,104    —     $20.47    05/13/18       

NQSO

  03/05/12    17,985    35,970    —     $14.44    03/05/19       

NQSO

  03/05/13    —      64,431    —     $10.50    03/05/20       

RSUs(5)

  03/04/11          1,465   $13,419    —     —  

RSUs(5)

  05/13/11          2,602   $23,834    —     —  

RSUs(5)

  03/05/12          16,772   $153,632    —     —  

RSUs(6)

  03/05/13          29,296   $268,351    —     —  

PShares

  03/04/11          —      —      3,285   $30,091

PShares

  05/13/11          —      —      5,637   $51,635

PShares

  03/05/12          —      —      16,268   $149,010

PShares

  03/05/13             19,771   $181,100

 

 

 
Name 

Grant
Date

  Option Awards(1)  Stock Awards 
  

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options

Exercisable

  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
  

Equity
Incentive

Plan

Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options

  

Option

Exercise
Price

  Option
Expiration
Date
  

Number
of

Shares

or Units
of
Stock
That
Have

Not
Vested

  Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested(2)
  

Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or

Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested(3)

  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested(2)
 

Mr. Cummins

            

NQSO

  05/12/05    11,629    —      —     $3.47    05/12/15       

NQSO

  03/05/09    10,658    —      —     $5.64    03/05/16       

NQSO

  03/04/10    14,781    —      —     $13.09    03/04/17       

NQSO

  03/04/11    5,724    2,862    —     $25.64    03/04/18       

NQSO

  03/05/12    5,995    11,990    —     $14.44    03/05/19       

NQSO

  03/05/13    —      51,546    —     $10.50    03/05/20       

RSU(5)

  03/04/11          1,137   $10,415    —      —    

RSU(5)

  03/05/12          5,770   $52,853    —      —    

RSU(6)

  03/05/13          23,808   $218,081    —      —    

RSU(7)

  03/05/13          47,619   $436,190    —      —    

PShares

  03/04/11          —      —      2,472   $22,644  

PShares

  03/05/12          —      —      5,423   $49,670  

PShares

  03/05/13          —      —      15,817   $144,881  

Ms. Hinrichs

            

NQSO

  03/05/09    27,203    —      —     $5.64    03/05/16       

NQSO

  03/04/10    45,313    —      —     $13.09    03/04/17       

NQSO

  03/04/11    14,720    7,360    —     $25.64    03/04/18       

NQSO

  03/05/12    11,990    23,980    —     $14.44    03/05/19       

NQSO

  03/05/13    —      56,700    —     $10.50    03/05/20       

RSUs

  03/04/11          3,338   $30,576    —      —    

RSUs

  03/05/12          11,542   $105,725    —      —    

RSU(6)

  03/05/13          26,188   $239,882    —      —    

RSU(7)

  03/05/13          47,619   $436,190    —      —    

PShares

  03/04/11          —      —      6,359   $58,244  

PShares

  03/05/12          —      —      10,845   $99,340  

PShares

  03/05/13          —      —      17,398   $159,368  

Mr. Mitchell

            

NQSO

  03/05/09    6,807    —      —     $5.64    03/05/16       

NQSO

  03/04/10    14,781    —      —     $13.09    03/04/17       

NQSO

  03/04/11    5,724    2,862    —     $25.64    03/04/18       

NQSO

  03/05/12    5,995    11,990    —     $14.44    03/05/19       

NQSO

  03/05/13    —      51,546    —     $10.50    03/05/20       

RSU(5)

  03/04/11          1,137   $10,415    —      —    

RSU(5)

  03/05/12          5,770   $52,853    —      —    

RSU(6)

  03/05/13          23,808   $218,081    —      —    

RSU(7)

  03/05/13          47,619   $436,190    —      —    

PShares

  03/04/11          —      —      2,472   $22,644  

PShares

  03/05/12          —      —      5,423   $49,670  

PShares

  03/05/13          —      —      15,817   $144,881  

 

 

 

     Option Awards(1)  Stock Awards 
Name Grant
Date
  

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options

Exercisable

  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
 

Option

Exercise
Price

  Option
Expiration
Date
  Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That Have
Not
Vested(2)
  Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That
Have Not
Vested(4)
  

Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,

Units or
Other

Rights That
Have

Not Vested(5)

  

Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market

or Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,

Units or
Other

Rights That
Have

Not Vested(4)

 

S.M. Johnson

          

Stock Options

  05/14/09    170,496    85,248    $9.36    05/14/16      

Stock Options

  03/04/10    47,199    94,398    $13.09    03/04/17      

Stock Options

  03/04/11        98,133    $25.64    03/04/18      

RSU

  05/14/09         60,075   $691,463          

RSU(3)

  05/14/09         104,302   $1,200,516          

RSU

  03/04/10         63,663   $732,761        ���  

RSU

  03/04/11         39,000   $448,890          

Performance Shares

  03/04/11                 28,265   $325,330  

P.L. Elders

          

Stock Options

  05/13/10    20,097    40,195    $13.37    05/13/17      

Stock Options

  03/04/11        24,531    $25.64    03/04/18      

RSU

  05/13/10         25,774   $296,659          

RSU

  03/04/11         9,750   $112,223          

Performance Shares

  03/04/11                 7,065   $81,318  

G.L. Carlson

          

Stock Options

  05/13/10    8,396    16,793    $13.37    03/29/17      

Stock Options

  03/04/11        9,813    $25.64    03/04/18      

RSU

  05/13/10         26,274   $302,414          

RSU

  03/04/11         4,551   $52,382          

Performance Shares

                2,826   $32,527  

L.K. Hinrichs

          

Stock Options

  03/05/09        27,203    $5.64    03/05/16      

Stock Options

  03/04/10    15,104    30,209    $13.09    03/04/17      

Stock Options

  03/04/11        22,080    $25.64    03/04/18      

RSU

  03/05/09         19,169   $220,635          

RSU(3)

  03/05/09         33,283   $383,087          

RSU

  03/04/10         20,371   $234,470          

RSU

  03/04/11         10,014   $115,261          

Performance Shares

  03/04/11                 6,359   $73,192  

J.T. McCormack

          

Stock Options

  03/05/09        14,155    $5.64    03/05/16      

Stock Options

  03/04/10  �� 8,518    17,037    $13.09    03/04/17      

Stock Options

  03/04/11        11,406    $25.64    03/04/18      

Stock Options

  05/13/11        18,312    $20.47    05/13/18      

RSU

  03/05/09         9,974   $114,800          

RSU(3)

  03/05/09         17,316   $199,307          

RSU

  03/04/10         11,490   $132,250          

RSU

  03/04/11         4,533   $52,175          

Performance Shares

  03/04/11                 3,285   $37,810  

RSU

  05/13/11         8,058   $92,748          

Performance Shares

  05/13/11                 5,637   $64,882  

J.T. Nesser

          

Stock Options

  03/05/09    45,172        $5.64    03/05/16      

Stock Options

  03/04/10    12,273    24,545    $13.09    03/04/17      

RSU

  03/04/10         16,184   $186,278          

(1)

The awards in this column represent grants of stock options, which generally become exercisable in accordance with the following vesting schedule:

Grant DateVesting Schedule:

03/05/09

1/3 per year on first, second and third anniversaries of grant date

05/14/09date.

1/3 per year on first, second and third anniversaries of grant date

03/04/10

1/3 per year on first, second and third anniversaries of grant date

05/13/10

Mr. Elders: 1/3 per year on first, second and third anniversaries of grant date

05/13/10

Mr. Carlson: 1/3 per year on March 29, 2011, 2012 and 2013 (the first, second and third anniversaries of Mr. Carlson’s hire date)

03/04/11

1/3 per year on first, second and third anniversaries of grant date

05/13/11

1/3 per year on first, second and third anniversaries of grant date

 

(2)The awards in this column represent grants of restricted stock units, which, with the exception of those grants of restricted stock units discussed in Note (3) below, generally vest in accordance with the following vesting schedule:

Grant DateVesting Schedule:

03/05/09

1/3 per year on first, second and third anniversaries of grant date

05/14/09

1/3 per year on first, second and third anniversaries of grant date

03/04/10

1/3 per year on first, second and third anniversaries of grant date

05/13/10

Mr. Elders: 1/3 per year on first, second and third anniversaries of grant date

05/13/10

Mr. Carlson: 1/3 per year on March 29, 2011, 2012 and 2013 (the first, second and third anniversaries of Mr. Carlson’s hire date)

03/04/11

1/3 per year on first, second and third anniversaries of grant date

05/13/11

1/3 per year on first, second and third anniversaries of grant date

(3)The grant of restricted stock units was converted from an original grant of performance shares in connection with the Spin-off and generally vests 100% on the third anniversary of the grant date.

(4)Market values in these columns are based on the closing price of our common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange as of December 30, 201131, 2013 ($11.51)9.16).

 

(5)(3)

The awards in this column represent grants of performance shares, which generally may vest on the third, fourth and/or fifth anniversaries of the grant date based on the attainment of stated performance levels as of December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015.levels. The number and value of performance shares reportedlisted with a grant date in 2011 is based on achieving threshold performance as of the December 31, 2013 measurement date. The number and value of performance shares reported with a grant date in 2012 is based on achieving threshold performance as of the December 31, 2014 measurement date. The number and value of performance shares reported with a grant date in 2013 is based on achieving threshold performance as of the December 31, 2015 measurement date.

(4)

The award to Mr. Dickson represents a grant of restricted stock, which generally vests as follows: 212,164 shares on June 15, 2014, 108,439 shares on June 15, 2015, 108,440 shares on June 15, 2016 and 108,439 shares on June 15, 2017.

(5)

These awards represent grants of restricted stock units, which generally vest 1/3 per year on the first, second and third anniversaries of grant date.

(6)

These awards represent grants of restricted stock units, which generally vest 1/4 per year on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of grant date.

(7)

These awards represent grants of retention restricted stock units, which generally vest 100% on the second anniversary of the date of grant.

 

 

OPTION EXERCISESOPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED STOCK VESTED

The following Option Exercises and Stock Vested table provides information about the value realized by our Named ExecutivesNEOs on exercises of option awards and vesting of stock awards during the year ended December 31, 2011.2013.

 

   Option Awards(1)   Stock Awards(2) 
Name  

Shares

Acquired

on Exercise (#)

   

Value Realized

on Exercise

   

Shares

Acquired

on Vesting (#)

   

Value Realized

on Vesting

 

S. M. Johnson

   0     N/A     205,316    $4,333,356  

P. L. Elders

   0     N/A     12,887    $263,797  

G. L. Carlson

   0     N/A     13,137    $327,374  

L. K. Hinrichs

   27,202    $526,200     119,901    $2,679,780  

J. T. McCormack

   14,154    $273,959     29,822    $762,999  

J. T. Nesser

   0     N/A     85,423    $2,036,053  

 

   Option Awards  Stock Awards(1)
  

 

Name  

Shares

Acquired

on Exercise (#)

  

Value Realized

on Exercise

  

Shares

Acquired

on Vesting (#)

  

Value Realized

on Vesting

 

Mr. Dickson

  0  N/A  0  N/A

Mr. Johnson

  0  N/A  73,687  $774,610

Mr. Elders

  0  N/A  23,927  $234,932

Mr. McCormack

  0  N/A  18,598  $192,013

Mr. Cummins

  0  N/A  7,347  $77,232

Ms. Hinrichs

  0  N/A  19,295  $202,868

Mr. Mitchell

  0  N/A  7,347  $77,232

 

 

(1)Each stock option exercise reported was effected as a simultaneous exercise and sale. The value realized on exercise was calculated based on the difference between the exercise prices of the stock options and the prices at which the shares were sold.

(2)The number of shares acquired on vesting reportedreflected in this table represents the aggregate number of shares that vested during 20112013 in connection with awards of restricted stock and restricted stock units. The value realized on vesting was calculated based on the fair market value of the underlying shares on the vesting date. The following table sets forth the amounts of shares attributable to restricted stock and restricted stock units for each Named Executive and the value realized on vesting of each respective type of award, as well as the number of shares withheld by McDermott to satisfy the minimum statutory withholding tax due upon vesting:vesting of such restricted stock units:

 

   Restricted Stock   Restricted Stock Units     
Name  Shares
Acquired
on Vesting (#)
   Value Realized
on Vesting
   Shares
Acquired
on Vesting (#)
   Value Realized
on Vesting
   Shares Acquired by McDermott
on Vesting of Stock Awards (#)
 

S. M. Johnson

   113,412    $2,287,520     91,904    $2,045,836     71,653  

P. L. Elders

   0     N/A     12,887    $263,797     3,408  

G. L. Carlson

   0     N/A     13,137    $327,374     3,474  

L. K. Hinrichs

   62,231    $1,204,301     57,670    $1,475,479     39,842  

J. T. McCormack

   1,196    $30,354     28,626    $732,645     7,957  

J. T. Nesser

   8,405    $192,972     77,018    $1,843,081     27,253  

 

NameShares Withheld by McDermott on Vesting of Stock Awards (#)

Mr. Dickson

N/A

Mr. Johnson

20,117

Mr. Elders

6,624

Mr. McCormack

5,110

Mr. Cummins

2,569

Ms. Hinrichs

5,398

Mr. Mitchell

2,569

 

 

PENSION BENEFITSPENSION BENEFITS

The following Pension Benefits table shows the present value of accumulated benefits payable to each of our Named ExecutivesNEOs under the qualified defined benefit pension plan (referred to as the Retirement Plan) and nonqualified pension plan (referred to as the Excess Plan)plans that we sponsor. All benefits under the defined benefit pension plans that we sponsor are frozen.

 

Name Plan Name  Number of
Years Credited
Service
   Present Value of
Accumulated Benefit(1)
   Payments
During 2011
 

S. M. Johnson

 N/A   N/A     N/A     N/A  
 

N/A

   N/A     N/A     N/A  

P. L. Elders

 N/A   N/A     N/A     N/A  
 

N/A

   N/A     N/A     N/A  

G. L. Carlson

 N/A   N/A     N/A     N/A  
 

N/A

   N/A     N/A     N/A  

L. K. Hinrichs

 McDermott Retirement Plan   11.167    $369,359    $0  
 

McDermott Excess Plan

   11.167    $154,621    $0  

J. T. McCormack

 N/A   N/A     N/A     N/A  
 

N/A

   N/A     N/A     N/A  

J. T. Nesser

 McDermott Retirement Plan   11.75    $468,199    $0  
 

McDermott Excess Plan

   11.75    $527,248    $0
  

 

Name  Plan Name Number
of Years
Credited
Service
  Present Value of
Accumulated Benefit
  Payments
During
2013

Mr. Dickson

  N/A N/A  N/A  N/A

Mr. Johnson

  N/A N/A  N/A  N/A

Mr. Elders

  N/A N/A  N/A  N/A

Mr. McCormack

  N/A N/A  N/A  N/A

Mr. Cummins

  TCN Plan(1) 23.92  $565,000  $0

Ms. Hinrichs

  U.S. Retirement Plan(2) 11.167  $400,472  $0
  U.S. Excess Plan(2) 11.167  $167,645  $0

Mr. Mitchell

  TCN Plan 19.50  $363,000  $0

 

 

(1)

The present value of accumulated benefits reflected above for the TCN Plan is based on a 4.8% discount rate and the IRS staticSAPS “All lives” base mortality table with improvements in the near future in line with the CMI_2011 model with a long term rate of future mortality improvements for valuation years beginning in 2012.both men and women of 1%.

 

(2)

The present value of accumulated benefits reflected above for the U.S. Retirement Plan and the U.S. Excess Plan is based on a 4.8% discount rate and the RP2000 mortality table for annuitants projected with generational mortality improvement scale.

Overview of QualifiedU.S. Retirement Plan. We refer to our qualified defined benefit pension plan as the U.S. Retirement Plan. Ms. Hinrichs is the only NEO who participates in the U.S. Retirement Plan,. which plan has been frozen since 2006 and under which she is accruing no additional benefits. The U.S. Retirement Plan is funded by a trust, and covers eligible employees of McDermott and its subsidiaries, as described below in the section entitled “Participation and Eligibility.” Nonresident alien employees who do not earn income in the United States and temporary resident alien employees are not eligible to participate in the Retirement Plan. In reviewing pension benefits payable to our Named Executives, it is important to note:

Of the Named Executives, only Ms. Hinrichs and Mr. Nesser participate in the Retirement Plan; and

As of 2006, all new participation in the Retirement Plan was closed, and benefit accruals under the Retirement Plan were frozen for all participants, including Ms. Hinrichs and Mr. Nesser, as of June 30, 2010.

For more information on our retirement plans, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Retirement Plans.”

Participation and Eligibility.    The Retirement Plan includes provisions related to eligibility, participation and benefit formulas for employees who were employed by McDermott’s subsidiary J. Rayapplicable employees.

McDermott Holdings, LLC and other designated affiliates thereof (collectively,Under the “JRM Coverage Group”), as well as for employees who were employed by McDermott Incorporated (now known as McDermott Investments, LLC) (collectively, the “MI Coverage Group”) and certain former salaried employees of a subsidiary of The Babcock & Wilcox Company who transferred to employment with McDermott Incorporated (collectively, “Former B&W Coverage Group”).

Generally, employees of participating employers who met a one-year service requirement were eligible to participate in theU.S. Retirement Plan, subject tonormal retirement is the following:

For the MI Coverage Group (which includes Ms. Hinrichs and Mr. Nesser):

New participation in the Retirement Plan was closed effective April 1, 2006.

For participants with less than five yearslater of service as of March 31, 2006 — Benefit accruals under the Retirement Plan were frozen as of that date, but cost-of-living increases continued to be paid, as discussed further below. Affected employees received service- based employer cash contributions to their Thrift Plan accounts. On June 30,

2010, the provision of the cost-of-living increase under the Retirement Plan was terminated, and, for affected participants, the Thrift Plan service-based contribution was replaced by a cash contribution equal to 3% of base pay, plus overtime pay, expatriate pay and commissions, which we refer to collectively as “thriftable earnings.”

For participants with more than five but less than ten years of service as of January 1, 2007 (which includes Mr. Nesser and Ms. Hinrichs) — A one-time irrevocable choice was offered to (1) continue benefit accruals under the Retirement Plan,age 65 or (2) freeze benefit accruals as of March 31, 2007, subject to annual cost-of-living increases, and receive instead service-based employer cash contributions to their Thrift Plan accounts. As of June 30, 2010, benefit accruals under the Retirement Plan were frozen altogether, and in lieu of any service-based cash contributions, affected participants now receive a cash contribution to their Thrift Plan accounts equal to 3% of thriftable earnings.

With respect to the cost-of-living increase, frozen accrued benefits of affected employees increased annually in line with increases in the Consumer Price Index, up to a maximum of 8% and a minimum of 1%, for each year the employee remained employed. As of June 30, 2010, the provisionfifth anniversary of the cost-of-living increase underdate an employee becomes a participant. The normal form of payment is a single-life annuity or a 50% joint and survivor annuity, depending on the Retirement Plan was terminated,employee’s marital status when payments are scheduled to begin. Early retirement eligibility and the accrued benefits under the Retirement Plan were frozen altogether.

depend on the employee’s date of hire and age. For the JRM Coverage Group (which includes Mr. McCormack), new participation was closed and benefit accruals were frozen effectiveemployees hired on or after April 1, 2003, with no cost-of-living allowance. Mr. McCormack did not meet1998 (including Ms. Hinrichs), an employee is eligible for early retirement after completing at least 15 years of credited service and attaining the Plan’s one-year service requirementage of 55. Early retirement benefits are based on the same formula as normal retirement, but the pension benefit is generally reduced 0.4% for eligibility to participate in the Retirement Plan prior to the participation closure for the JRM Coverage Group.

No Named Executives are included in the Former B&W Coverage Group.

Benefits.    Mr. Nesser andeach month that benefits commence before age 62. Ms. Hinrichs arehas not accrued enough credited service to be eligible for early retirement under the only Named Executives entitled toU.S. Retirement Plan.

Ms. Hinrichs’ benefits under the U.S. Retirement Plan. Their benefitsPlan are calculated as follows: 1.2% of final average monthly compensation as of June 30, 2010 up to the Social Security limit times credited service up to 35 years, plus 1.65% of final average monthly compensation as of June 30, 2010 in excess of the Social Security limit times credited service up to 35 years. Final average monthly compensation excludes bonuses and commissions.

U.S. Excess Plan. We refer to our nonqualified pension plan as the U.S. Excess Plan. Ms. Hinrichs is the only NEO who participates in the U.S. Excess Plan, which plan has been frozen since 2006 and under which she is accruing no additional benefits. To the extent benefits

payable under the U.S. Retirement Plan are limited by Section 415(b) or 401(a)(17) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, pension benefits will be paid under the terms of the U.S. Excess Plan. Because benefits entitlement under the U.S. Excess Plan and Earlythe U.S. Retirement Plan are linked, benefits under the U.S. Excess Plan have been frozen since 2006, when benefit accruals under the U.S. Retirement Plan were frozen.

TCN Pension Plan..     We refer to our defined benefit pension plan for certain non-U.S. employees as the TCN Pension Plan. Messrs. Cummins and Mitchell are the only NEOs who participate in the TCN Pension Plan, which plan is now frozen and under which Mr. Cummins is accruing no additional benefits. The TCN Pension Plan is funded by a trust, and includes provisions related to eligibility, participation and benefit formulas for employees who were employed by certain of our non-U.S. subsidiaries.

Under the RetirementTCN Pension Plan, normal retirement age is age 65. The normal form of payment is a single-life annuity or a 50%66% joint and survivor annuity, depending on the employee’s marital status when the payments are scheduled to begin. Early retirement eligibility and benefits under the RetirementTCN Pension Plan depend on the employee’s date of hire and age.

Forare generally available for employees hired on or after April 1, 1998 (including Mr. Nesser and Ms. Hinrichs):

an employee is eligible for early retirement after completingwho have completed at least 1510 years of credited service and attainingattained the age of 55; and

early55. Early retirement benefits are based on the same formula as normal retirement, but the pension benefit is generally reduced 0.4%0.5% for each month that benefits commence before age 62.

Ms. Hinrichs has not accrued enough credited service to be eligible for early retirement under the Retirement Plan. At Mr. Nesser’s resignation from employment with McDermott on July 29, 2011, he had not accrued enough credited service to be eligible for early retirement under the Retirement Plan.60.

Overview of Nonqualified Plan.    To the extent benefits payable under the Retirement Plan are limited by Section 415(b) or 401(a)(17) of the Internal Revenue Code, pension benefits will be paid directly by the applicable subsidiary of McDermott under the terms of the unfunded excess benefit plan maintained by McDermott (referred to as the “Excess Plan”). Effective January 1, 2006, the Excess Plan was amended to limit the annual bonus payments taken into account in calculating the Excess Plan benefits to the lesser of the actual bonus paid or 25% of the prior

year’s base salary. Furthermore, because benefits entitlement under the Excess Plan and the Retirement Plan are linked,Normal retirement benefits under the ExcessTCN Pension Plan have been frozen since 2006 when benefit accruals underare calculated as follows: Number of years of credit service times 1/100th of the Retirement Plan were frozen.

Mr. Nesser and Ms. Hinrichs each participate inaverage of the Excess Plan. Based on Mr. Nesser’s age and accruedhighest three successive annual base salaries during the last 10 years of credited service at his resignation from employment, he will not be entitled to commence benefit payments underpreceding December 31, 2011, the Excess Plan until normal retirement under thedate, date of death or severance from service date, whichever occurs first.

For more information on our retirement plans, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Retirement Plan.Plans.”

 

 

NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATIONNONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION

The following Nonqualified Deferred Compensation table summarizes our Named Executives’NEOs’ compensation under the McDermott International, Inc. Director and Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”). The compensation shown in this table is entirely attributable to the Deferred Compensation Plan.

The Deferred Compensation Plan is an unfunded, defined contribution retirement plan for directors and officers of McDermott and its subsidiaries selected to participate by our Compensation Committee. Benefits under the Deferred Compensa-

tionCompensation Plan are based onon: (1) the participant’s deferral account, which is comprised of the notional account balance reflecting any executive contributions of deferred compensation,compensation; and (2) the participant’s vested percentage in his or her company account, which is comprised of the notional account balance reflecting any company contributions.Company Contributions. A participant is at all times 100% vested in his or her deferral account. A participant generally vests in his or her company account 20% each year, subject to accelerated vesting for death, disability and termination without cause or termination within 24 months following a change in control.

Mr. Dickson was not a participant in the Deferred Compensation Plan in 2013.

 

Name Executive
Contributions  in
2011(1)
  Company
Contributions  in
2011(2)
  Aggregate
Earnings
in  2011(3)
  

Aggregate
Withdrawals/

Distributions

  Aggregate
Balance
at  12/31/11(4)
 

S. M. Johnson

 $0   $97,932   ($9,651 $0   $164,908  

P. L. Elders

 $0   $39,950    $796   $0   $40,746  

G. L. Carlson

 $0   $24,800   ($286 $0   $24,514  

L. K. Hinrichs

 $0   $43,511    $0.00   $0   $134,570  

J. T. McCormack

 $0   $36,170    $1,383   $0   $37,553  

J. T. Nesser

 $0   $55,219   ($34,873 $0   $766,375  

 

Name  Executive
Contributions
in 2013
(1)
  Company
Contributions
in 2013
(2)
  Aggregate
Earnings
in 2013
(3)
  

Aggregate
Withdrawals/

Distributions

  Aggregate
Balance at
12/31/13
(4)
  

Percentage
Vested at

12/31/13(5)

Mr. Dickson

  —    —    —    —    —    —  

Mr. Johnson

  $0  $47,500  $65,346  $0  $428,356  100%

Mr. Elders

  $0  $24,687  $7,827  $0  $129,531  60%

Mr. McCormack

  $0  $26,750  $24,767  $0  $138,738  100%

Mr. Cummins

  $0  $18,750  $8,417  $0  $54,856  40%

Ms. Hinrichs

  $0  $22,437  $0  $0  $194,669  100%

Mr. Mitchell

  $0  $18,750  $0  $0  $48,299  40%

 

 

(1)

In November 2010, our Compensation Committee approved the deferral of eligible executives’ compensation beginning January 1, 2011. Under the terms of our Deferred Compensation Plan, an eligible executive may defer up to 50% of his or her annual salary and/or up to 100% of any bonus earned in any year.

(2)

We make annual contributions to specified participants’ notional accounts equal to a percentage of the participant’s prior-year compensation. Under the terms of the Deferred Compensation Plan, the contribution percentage does not need to be the same for each participant. Additionally, our Compensation Committee may make a discretionary contribution to a participant’s account at any time. With the exception of Messrs. Elders and Carlson, for 2011,In 2013, our contributions on behalf of Named Executives who were participantsNEOs equaled 5% of the respective Named Executives’ base salaries and annual incentive compensation awards paidparticipants’ Compensation (as defined in 2010. Messrs. Elders and Carlsonthe Deferred Compensation Plan) received a Company Contribution in an amount equal to 5% of their respective prior-year base salary paid. In addition, Messrs. Elders and Carlson received a discretionary contribution equal in value to 5% of their respective target bonus for 2010 and the value of their respective prior-year target base salaries they would have earned for the period January 1, 2010 through their respective hire dates. All of our 20112012. Those contributions are included in the Summary Compensation Table above as “All Other Compensation.”

(3)

The amounts reported in this column represent hypotheticalnotional accrued gains or losses during 20112013 on each Named Executive’sNEO’s account. The accounts are “participant-directed,” in that each participant personally directs the investment of contributions made on his or her behalf. As a result, any accrued gains or losses are attributable to the performance of the Named Executive’sNEO’s notional mutual fund investments. No amount of the earnings shown is reported as compensation in the Summary Compensation Table.

(4)

The amounts reported in this column consist of contributions made by McDermott and hypotheticalnotional accrued gains or losses as of December 31, 2011.2013. The balances shown include contributions from previous years which have been reported as compensation to the Named ExecutivesNEOs in the Summary Compensation Table for those years — to the extent a Named ExecutiveNEO was included in the Summary Compensation Table during those years. The amounts of such contributions previously included in the Summary Compensation Table and years reported are as follows: Mr. Johnson received a contributioncontributions from McDermott of $108,068 in 2012, $97,932 in 2011 and $69,375 in 2010; Ms. Hinrichs received a contribution from McDermott of $29,549 in 2010; and Mr. NesserElders received contributions from McDermott of $36,806, $55,104$43,970 in 2012 and $44,926$39,950 in 2010, 20092011; Mr. McCormack received contributions from McDermott of $38,828 in 2012 and 2008, respectively.$36,170 in 2011; and Ms. Hinrichs received contributions from McDermott of $37,662 in 2012, $43,511 in 2011 and $29,549 in 2010.

As of December 31, 2011, Messrs. Johnson, Elders, Carlson and McCormack are 20% vested in their respective Deferred Compensation Plan balances shown as a result of becoming participants in the Deferred Compensation Plan during 2011. Mr. Nesser is 100% vested in his Deferred Compensation Plan balance shown.

In May 2009, our Compensation Committee amended the Deferred Compensation Plan to vest Deferred Compensation Plan balances that were unvested as of December 31, 2008 (including future gains and losses thereon). Amounts allocated on or after January 1, 2009 vest pursuant to the participant’s vested percentage, based on years of participation. Accordingly, Ms. Hinrichs is 84.38% vested in her Deferred Compensation Plan balance shown.

(5)

Under the terms of his separation agreement, Mr. Johnson was 100% vested in his Deferred Compensation Plan balance at December 31, 2013. Mr. McCormack was 100% vested in his Deferred Compensation Plan balance as a result of his separation from service with McDermott after obtaining age 65.

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATIONPOTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE CHANGE IN CONTROL CONTROL

The following tables show potential payments to certain of our Named ExecutivesNEOs under existing contracts, agreements, plans or arrangements, whether written or unwritten, for various scenarios under which a payment would be due (assuming each is applicable) involving a change in control or termination of employment of each of our Named Executives,NEOs, assuming a December 31, 20112013 termination date and, where applicable, using the closing price of our common stock of $11.51$9.16 as of December 31, 2013 (as reported on the New York Stock Exchange) as of December 30, 2011.NYSE). These tables do not reflect amounts that would be payable to the Named ExecutivesNEOs pursuant to benefits or awards that are already vested.

The amounts reported in the below tables for stock options, restricted stock units and performance shares represent the value of unvested and accelerated shares or units, as applicable, calculated by:

 

for stock options: multiplying the number of accelerated options by the difference between the exercise price and $11.51$9.16 (the closing price of our common stock on December 30, 2011,31, 2013, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange)NYSE); and

 

for restricted stock units and performance shares: multiplying the number of accelerated shares or units by $11.51$9.16 (the closing price of our common stock on December 30, 2011,31, 2013, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange)NYSE).

Mr. NesserJohnson retired from his position as President and Chief Executive Officer of McDermott on July 29, 2011.December 16, 2013, and as Chairman and a member of the Board of Directors effective December 31, 2013. In connection with his retirement, a subsidiary of McDermottwe entered into a Separation Agreementseparation agreement with Mr. Nesser.Johnson. Under the terms of the Separation Agreement,that separation agreement, Mr. Nesser was entitled to receive the payments and benefits detailed in Section 1 of the Restructuring Transaction Retention Agreement entered into between Mr. Nesser and a subsidiary of McDermott in connection with the Spin-off. These payments and benefits included: (1) a cash severance payment in the amount of $1,742,527, (2) payment of his 2011 target EICP award, prorated to take into account his length of service in 2011, in the amount of $206,408, (3) two times the full annual cost of coverage for medical, dental and vision benefits in the amount of $35,127, (4) unused vacation for 2011 in the amount of $39,424, (5) the value of unvested and accelerated stock options in the amount of $328,174, and (6) the value of unvested and accelerated restricted stock and restricted stock units in the amount of $547,034. Pursuant to the terms of his Separation Agreement, Mr. NesserJohnson will also continue to vest in 24,545in: (1) 410,345 stock options and 16,553as if he had remained employed by McDermott though March 15, 2016; (2) 189,754 restricted stock units as if he had remained employed by McDermott through March 4, 2013.15, 2017; and (3) 401,059 performance shares as if he had remained employed through March 15, 2017. The value of the stock options, and restricted stock units and performance shares, less a number of restricted stock units that were forfeited in connection with the payment of certain taxes, willis expected to be determined on the anniversaries of each award’s applicable grant date in March 4, 20122015, 2016 and March 4, 2013. In addition,2017. Additionally, $171,345, or 40%, of Mr. Nesser received $25,000 per month forJohnson’s benefits under the performance of consulting servicesDeferred Compensation Plan were fully vested as set forth in his Separation Agreement. As of December 31, 2011, 2013 pursuant to the terms of his separation agreement.

Mr. NesserMcCormack retired from his position as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of McDermott on October 31, 2013. In connection with his retirement, we entered into a separation agreement with Mr. McCormack. Under the terms of that separation agreement, Mr. McCormack will continue to vest in: (1) 88,830 stock options; (2) 36,389 restricted stock units; and (3) 50,379 performance shares as if he had received $125,000 forremained employed by McDermott though October 31, 2015. The value of the provisionstock options, restricted stock units and performance shares, less a number of these consulting services.restricted stock units that were forfeited in connection with the payment of certain taxes, is expected to be determined on the anniversaries of each award’s applicable grant date in 2014 and 2015.

Mr. Mitchell resigned from his position as Senior Vice President and General Manager, Middle East & Atlantic, on January 27, 2014. In connection with his resignation, we entered into a separation agreement with Mr. Mitchell. Under the terms of that separation agreement, Mr. Mitchell was paid: (1) $748,694, representing a statutorily provided end-of-service payment to which he was entitled on termination of employment as an expatriate employee in the United Arab Emirates, determined based on Mr. Mitchell’s base salary on termination and his years of service within the U.A.E.; (2) a relocation allowance in the amount of $10,000; and (3) accrued but unutilized vacation pay in the amount of $16,985.

Estimated Value of Benefits to Be Received Upon Termination Due to Death or Disability

The following table shows the value of payments and other benefits due the Continuing Named Executiveslisted NEOs assuming their death or disability as of December 31, 2011.2013.

 

   S.M. Johnson  P.L. Elders  G.L. Carlson  L.K. Hinrichs  J.T. McCormack 

Severance Payments

                    

EICP

                    

Deferred Compensation Plan(1)

 $131,926   $32,597   $19,611   $21,020   $30,042  

Stock Options(2) (unvested and accelerated)

 $0   $0   $0   $0   $0  

Restricted Stock Units(3) (unvested and accelerated)

 $3,073,630   $408,881   $354,796   $953,454   $591,280  

Performance Shares(4) (unvested)

 $650,649   $162,636   $65,055   $146,373   $205,384  

Total

 $3,856,205   $604,114   $439,462   $1,120,847   $826,706  

 

    Mr. Dickson  Mr. Elders  Mr. Cummins  Ms. Hinrichs  Mr. Mitchell

Severance Payments

  —    —    —    —    —  

EICP

  —    —    —    —    —  

Deferred Compensation Plan(1)

  —    $ 51,812  $ 32,914  $ 0  $28,979

Stock Options(2)

(unvested and accelerated)

  —    $ 0  $ 0  $ 0  $ 0

Restricted Stock Awards(3)

  $4,923,335  —    —    —    —  

Restricted Stock Units(4)

(unvested and accelerated)

  —    $412,365  $717,539  $812,373  $717,539

Performance Shares(5) (unvested)

  —    $873,388  $577,107  $790,893  $577,107
                

Total

  $4,923,335  $1,337,565  $1,327,560  $1,603,266  $1,323,626

 

 

(1)

The amounts reported represent 80%40% of Mr. Elders’ and 60% of Messrs. Johnson’s, Elders’, Carlson’s,Cummins’ and McCormack’s and 15.62% of Ms. Hinrichs’Mitchell’s respective Deferred Compensation PlanDCP balance as of December 31, 20112013 that would become vested on death or disability. Mr. Dickson was not a participant in the DCP as of December 31, 2013. Because Ms. Hinrichs is 100% vested in her DCP balance, no additional amount would become vested on her death or disability.

 

(2)

Under the terms of the outstanding stock option awards outstanding forheld by each of the Continuing Named Executiveslisted NEOs as of December 31, 2011,2013, all unvested option awards would become vested and exercisable on death or disability. Due to the exercise price of the stock options outstanding and the closing price of our common stock on December 30, 2011,31, 2013, the aggregate value of stock options that would become vested and exercisable on death or disability for all Continuing Named Executiveseach applicable NEO would be $0.

 

(3)

Under the terms of the restricted stock award agreement between McDermott and Mr. Dickson, all unvested restricted stock would become vested upon Mr. Dickson’s death or disability.

(4)

Under the terms of the outstanding restricted stock unit awards outstanding forheld by each of the Continuing Named Executiveslisted NEOs as of December 31, 2011,2013, all unvested restricted stock unit awards would become vested and exercisable on his or her death or disability.

 

(4)(5)

Under the terms of the outstanding 2011 and 2012 performance share awards outstanding forheld by each of the Continuing Named Executiveslisted NEOs as of December 31, 2011,2013, 100% of the initial performance shares granted would vest on the third, fourth and fifth anniversary of the grant date on his or her death or disability. The number of performance shares that would vest is the number of performance shares that would have vested based on actual performance had the Continuing Named ExecutiveNEO remained employed with McDermott until the third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the grant date. Under the terms of the outstanding 2013 performance share awards held by each of the listed NEOs as of December 31, 2013, 100% of the initial performance shares granted would vest on the third anniversary of the grant date on his or her death or disability. The number of performance shares that would vest is the number of performance shares that would have vested based on actual performance had the NEO remained employed with McDermott until the third anniversary of the grant date. Accordingly, each Continuing Named Executiveapplicable listed NEO may vest in a number of performance shares ranging from 0% — 200% of the initial performance shares granted, depending on McDermott’s total shareholder return relative to its peersperformance during the applicable measurement periods. The amounts reported assume a total of 100% of the initial performance shares granted will vest during the applicable measurement periods, valued at the closing price of McDermott stock as reported on the NYSE on December 30, 2011, although the actual value of such performance shares that may vest on the third, fourth and fifth anniversary of the date of grant could be $0 for each Continuing Named Executive and up to $1,301,298 for Mr. Johnson, $325,273 for Mr. Elders, $130,109 for Mr. Carlson, $292,745 for Ms. Hinrichs, and $410,769 for Mr. McCormack, in each case representing a total of 200% of the initial performance shares granted. Additionally, the value of McDermott stock could be greater or less than the amount used to value the performance shares for this table.

The amounts reported assume a total of 100% of the initial performance shares granted will vest during the applicable measurement periods, valued at the closing price of McDermott stock as reported on the NYSE on December 31, 2013, although the actual value of such performance shares that may vest could be $0 for each NEO and up to $1,746,776 for Mr. Elders, $1,154,214 for Mr. Cummins, $1,154,214 for Mr. Mitchell and $1,581,786 for Ms. Hinrichs, in each case representing a total of 200% of the initial performance shares granted. Additionally, the value of McDermott common stock could be greater or less than the amount used to value the performance shares for this table.

Estimated Value of Benefits to Be Received Upon Change in Control

We have change-in-control agreements with various officers, including each of our Continuing Named Executives.NEOs. Generally, under these agreements, if a Continuing Named ExecutiveNEO is terminated within one year following a change in control eithereither: (1) by theour company for any reason other than cause or death or disability,disability; or (2) by the Continuing Named ExecutiveNEO for good reason, McDermott is required to pay the Continuing Named ExecutiveNEO a severance payment based on the Continuing Named Executives’NEO’s salary and a severance payment based on the Continuing Named Executives’NEO’s target EICP percentage. In addition to these payments, the Continuing Named ExecutiveNEO would be entitled to various accrued benefits earned through the date of termination, such as earned but unpaid salary, earned but unused vacation and reimbursements.

Under these agreements, a “change in control” generally occurs on the occurrence of any of the following:

 

a person becomes the beneficial owner of 30% or more of the combined voting power of McDermott’s then outstanding voting stock unless such acquisition is made directly from McDermott in a transaction approved by a majority of McDermott’s incumbent directors;

 

individuals who are incumbent directors cease for any reason to constitute a majority of McDermott’s board;

 

completion of a merger or consolidation of McDermott with another company or an acquisition by McDermott or its subsidiaries, unless immediately following such merger, consolidation or acquisition: (1) all or substantially all of the individuals or entities that were the beneficial owners of outstanding McDermott voting securities immediately before such merger, consolidation or acquisition beneficially own at least 50% of the then outstanding shares of voting stock of the parent corporation resulting from the merger, consolidation or acquisition in the same relative proportions as their ownership immediately before such merger, consolidation or acquisition; (2) if such merger, consolidation or acquisition involves the issuance or payment by McDermott of consideration to another entity or its stockholders, the total fair market value of such consideration plus the principal amount of the consolidated long-term debt of the entity or business being acquired, does not exceed 50% of the sum of the fair market value of the outstanding McDermott voting stock plus the principal amount of our consolidated long-term debt; (3) no person beneficially owns 30% or more of the then outstanding shares of the voting stock of the parent company resulting from such merger, consolidation or acquisition; and (4) a majority of the members of the board of directors of the parent corporation resulting from such merger, consolidation or acquisition were incumbent directors of McDermott immediately before such merger, consolidation or acquisition;

involves the issuance or payment by McDermott of consideration to another entity or its stockholders, the total fair market value of such consideration plus the principal amount of the consolidated long-term debt of the entity or business being acquired, does not exceed 50% of the sum of the fair market value of the outstanding McDermott voting stock plus the principal amount of the Company’s consolidated long-term debt; (3) no person beneficially owns 30% or more of the then outstanding shares of the voting stock of the parent company resulting from such merger, consolidation or acquisition; and (4) a majority of the members of the board of directors of the parent corporation resulting from such merger, consolidation or acquisition were incumbent directors of McDermott immediately before such merger, consolidation or acquisition;

 

completion of the sale or disposition of 50% or more of the assets of McDermott and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis, unless immediately following such sale or disposition: (1) the individuals and entities that were beneficial owners of outstanding McDermott voting stock immediately before such sale or disposition beneficially own at least 50% of the then outstanding shares of voting stock of McDermott and of the entity that acquires the largest portion of such assets, and (2) a majority of the members of the McDermott Board (if it continues to exist) and the board of directors of the entity that acquires the largest portion of such assets were incumbent directors of McDermott immediately before the completion of such sale or disposition; or

 

any other set of circumstances is deemed by the Board in its sole discretion to constitute a change in control.

The change-in-control agreements do not provide for excise tax gross-ups. They do, however, provide for the potential reduction in payments to the applicable officer in order to avoid excise taxes.

The following table shows the estimated value of payments and other benefits due the Continuing Named Executiveslisted NEOs, assuming a change in control and termination as of December 31, 2011.2013. Because Mr. Dickson

joined McDermott in October 2013, he was not a participant in the EICP for 2013 and would not have been entitled to an EICP-based severance payment assuming a change in control and termination as of December 31, 2013.

 

   S.M. Johnson  P.L. Elders  G.L. Carlson  L.K. Hinrichs  J.T. McCormack 

Salary-Based Severance Payment(1)

 $5,658,882   $1,643,822   $1,070,466   $1,402,763   $1,549,098  

EICP-Based Severance Payment(2)

 $950,000   $339,500   $201,600   $264,000   $350,000  

Deferred Compensation Plan(3)

 $131,926   $32,597   $19,611   $21,020   $30,042  

Stock Options(4) (unvested and accelerated)

 $0   $0   $0   $0   $0  

Restricted Stock Units(4) (unvested and accelerated)

 $3,073,630   $408,881   $354,796   $953,454   $591,280  

Performance Shares(4) (unvested and accelerated)

 $650,649   $162,636   $65,055   $146,373   $205,384  

Total

 $10,465,087   $2,587,436   $1,711,528   $2,787,610   $2,725,804  

 

    Mr. Dickson  Mr. Elders  Mr. Cummins  Ms. Hinrichs  Mr. Mitchell

Salary-Based Severance Payment(1)

  $2,125,000  $1,745,822  $1,516,192  $1,616,496  $1,516,912

EICP-Based Severance Payment(2)

  —    $ 360,500  $ 315,000  $ 334,425  $ 315,000

Deferred Compensation Plan(3)

  —    $ 51,812  $ 32,914  $ 0  $ 28,979

Stock Options(4)
(unvested and accelerated)

  —    $ 0  $ 0  $ 0  $ 0

Restricted Stock Awards(4)
(unvested and accelerated)

  $4,923,335  —    —    —    —  

Restricted Stock Units(4)
(unvested and accelerated)

  —    $ 412,365  $ 717,539  $ 812,373  $ 717,539

Performance Shares(4)
(unvested and accelerated)

  —    $ 873,388  $ 577,107  $ 790,893  $ 577,107

 

Total

  $7,048,335  $3,443,887  $3,158,752  $3,554,187  $3,155,537

 

 

(1)

The salary-based severance payment made to each Continuing Named Executive,listed NEO, with the exception of Mr. Johnson,Dickson, in connection with a change in control would be a cash payment equal to 200% of the sum of his or her annual base salary prior to termination and his or her EICP target award applicable to the year in which the termination occurs. The severance payment made to Mr. JohnsonDickson in connection with a change in control would be a cash payment equal to 299%250% of the sum of his annual base salary prior to termination and his EICP target award applicable to the year in which the termination occurs.

For a hypothetical termination as of December 31, 2011,2013, the salary-based severance payment under a change in control would have been calculated based on the following base salary and target EICP awards. See “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” above for more information on the calculation of target EICP awards.

 

  
  
Continuing Named Executive  Annual Base Salary   Target EICP Award 

S. M. Johnson

  $950,000    $942,603  

P. L. Elders

  $485,000    $336,911  

G. L. Carlson

  $336,000    $199,233  

L. K. Hinrichs

  $440,000    $261,381  

J. T. McCormack

  $500,000    $274,549  
  
  

 

NEO  Annual Base Salary  Target EICP Award

Mr. Dickson

  $850,000  —  

Mr. Elders

  $515,000  $357,911

Mr. Cummins

  $450,000  $308,096

Ms. Hinrichs

  $477,750  $330,498

Mr. Mitchell

  $450,000  $308,096

 

 

(2)

Each Continuing Named Executivelisted NEO could receive up to two EICP-based severance payments in connection with a change in control depending on the timing of the termination relative to the payment of an EICP award, as follows:

 

If an EICP award for the year prior to termination is paid to other EICP participants after the date of the Continuing Named Executive’sNEO’s termination, the Continuing Named ExecutiveNEO would be entitled to a cash payment equal to the product of the Continuing Named Executive’sNEO’s target EICP percentage (or, if greater, the actual amount of the bonus determined under the EICP for the year prior to termination) and the Continuing Named Executive’sNEO’s annual base salary for the applicable period. No such payment would have been due a Continuing Named ExecutiveNEO on a December 31, 20112013 termination, because the 20102012 EICP awards had already been paid prior to the Continuing Named Executive’s termination date.paid.

 

The Continuing Named ExecutiveNEO would be entitled to a prorated EICP payment based upon the Continuing Named Executive’sNEO’s target EICP percentage for the year in which the termination occurs and the number of days in which the Continuing Named ExecutiveNEO was employed with us during that year. Based on a hypothetical December 31, 20112013 termination, each Continuing Named ExecutiveNEO would have been entitled to an EICP payment equal to 100% of his or her 20112013 target EICP percentage times annual base salary, calculated based on the following base salary and target EICP percentage:

 

  
Continuing Named Executive  Annual
Base Salary
   Target EICP
Percentage
 

S. M. Johnson

  $950,000     100

P. L. Elders

  $485,000     70

G. L. Carlson

  $336,000     60

L. K. Hinrichs

  $440,000     60

J. T. McCormack

  $500,000     70
  
  

 

NEO  Annual Base Salary  Target EICP Percentage

Mr. Dickson

  $850,000  —  

Mr. Elders

  $515,000  70%

Mr. Cummins

  $450,000  70%

Ms. Hinrichs

  $477,750  70%

Mr. Mitchell

  $450,000  70%

 

(3)

The amounts reported represent 80%40% of Mr. Elders’ and 60% of Messrs. Johnson’s, Elders’, Carlson’sCummins’ and McCormack’s and 15.62% of Ms. Hinrichs’Mitchell’s respective Deferred Compensation Plan balance as of December 31, 20112012 that would become vested in connection with a termination of employment following a change in control. Mr. Dickson was not a participant in the Deferred Compensation Plan as of December 31, 2013. Because Ms. Hinrichs is 100% vested in her Deferred Compensation Plan balance, no additional amount would become vested in connection with a termination of employment following a change in control. Under the Deferred Compensation Plan, a “change in control” generally occurs if:

 

a person (other than a McDermott employee benefit plan or a corporation owned by McDermott stockholders in substantially the same proportion as the ownership of McDermott voting shares) is or becomes the beneficial owner of 30% or more of the combined voting power of McDermott’s then outstanding voting stock;

during any period of two consecutive years, individuals who at the beginning of such period constitute McDermott’s Board of Directors, and any new director whose election or nomination by McDermott’s Board was approved by at least two-thirds of the directors of McDermott’s Board then still in office who either were directors at the beginning of the period or whose election or nomination was previously approved, cease to constitute a majority of McDermott’s Board;

 

a merger or consolidation of McDermott with any other corporation or entity has been completed, other than a merger or consolidation which results in the outstanding McDermott voting securities immediately prior to such merger or consolidation continuing to represent at least 50% of the combined voting power of the voting securities of McDermott or the surviving entity outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation;

 

McDermott’s stockholders approve (1) a plan of complete liquidation of McDermott; or (2) an agreement for the sale or disposition by McDermott of all or substantially all of McDermott’s assets; or

 

within one year following the completion of a merger or consolidation transaction involving McDermott, (1) individuals who, at the time of execution and delivery of definitive agreements completing such transaction constituted the Board, cease for any reason (excluding death, disability or voluntary resignation) to constitute a majority of the Board; or (2) either individual, who at the first execution and delivery of definitive agreements completing the transaction, served as Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer does not, for any reason (excluding death, disability or voluntary resignation), serve as the Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer, as applicable, of McDermott, or if McDermott does not continue as a registrant with a class of equity securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as the Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer, as applicable, of a corporation or other entity that is (A) a registrant with a class of equity securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (B) the surviving entity in such transaction or a parent entity of the surviving entity or McDermott following the completion of such transaction; provided, however, that a Changechange in Controlcontrol would not be deemed to have occurred pursuant to this clause in the case of a merger or consolidation which results in the voting securities of McDermott outstanding immediately prior to the completion of the transaction continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity) at least 55% of the combined voting power of the voting securities of the McDermott or the surviving entity outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation.

 

(4)

Under the terms of the stock option and restricted stock unit awards outstanding, all unvested stock options would become vested and exercisable and all unvested restricted stock units would become vested on a change in control, regardless of whether there is a subsequent termination of employment. Due to the exercise price of the stock options outstanding for our Continuing Named ExecutivesNEOs and the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on December 30, 2011,31, 2013, the aggregate value of stock options that would become vested and exercisable on a change in control, regardless of whether there is a subsequent termination of employment, would be $0. Under the terms of the performance share awards outstanding, the greater of (1) 100% of the initial performance shares granted, or (2) the vested percentage of initial performance shares determined in accordance with the grant agreement would become vested on a change in control, regardless of whether there is a subsequent termination of employment. Under our 2001 D&O Plan andthe 2009 LTIP, a “change in control” generally occurs under the same circumstances described above with respect to our Deferred Compensation Plan, except that the 2001 D&O Plan and the 2009 LTIP dodoes not include, as a change in control event, the event described in the last bullet in note (3) above.

 

 

ADVISORY VOTEADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION APPROVE NEO COMPENSATION

(ITEMITEM 2)

As required by Section 14A(a)(1) of the Exchange Act, we are providing our stockholders with an advisory vote to approve named executive officerNEO compensation.

The Compensation Committee has overall responsibility for our compensation plans, policies and programs with respect to the Named Executives.NEOs. Additional information regarding the Compensation Committee and its role is described under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and the related tables and narrative disclosures. Our compensation programs are based on our belief that our ability to develop, attract, retain and motivate qualified employees to develop, expand and execute sound business opportunities is essential to the success of our company. To that end, the Compensation Committee, with the assistance of its compensation consultant, designs and administers compensation programs with the participation of our management. These programs generally seek to provide compensation that:

 

incentivizes and rewards short- and long-term performance, continuity of service and individual contributions; and

 

promotes retention of well-qualified executives, while aligning the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders.

We believe our compensation programs motivate and retainencourage the Continuing Named Executives,retention of the NEOs, while allowing for appropriate levels of business risk through some of the following features:

 

  

Reasonable Compensation Programs — Using the elements of total direct compensation, the Compensation Committee seeks to provide compensation opportunities for employees targeted at or near the median compensation of comparable positions in our market. As a result, we believe the total direct compensation of our executive officer employeesofficers provides a reasonable and appropriate mix of cash and equity, annual and longer-term incentives and performance metrics.

 

  

EmphasizeEmphasis on Long-Term Incentive Compensation Over Annual Incentive Compensation — Long-term incentive compensation typically makes up a larger percentage of an executive officer employee’sofficer’s total direct compen-

sationcompensation than annual incentive compensation. Incentive compensation helps drive performance and align the interests of thoseour employees with those of stockholders. In addition, tying a significant portion of an employee’s total direct compensation to long-term incentives (which typically vest over a period of three or more years) helps to promote longer-term perspectives regarding our company’s performance.

 

  

Clawback Policy — The Compensation Committee has adopted a policy that allows McDermott to take back, under which McDermott shall seekcertain circumstances, compensation paid to recover any incentive-based award granted to any executive officer as required by the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act or any other “clawback” provision required by law or the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange.officers.

 

  

Long-Term Incentive Compensation Subject to Forfeiture — The Compensation Committee may terminate any outstanding stock award if the recipient, while employed by McDermott or performing services on behalf of McDermott under any consulting agreement: (1) is convicted of a misdemeanor involving fraud, dishonesty or moral turpitude or a felony; or (2) engages in conduct that adversely affects or, in the sole judgment of the Compensation Committee, may reasonably be expected to adversely affect, ourthe business reputation or economic interests.interests of our company.

 

  

Annual Incentive Compensation Subject to Threshold Performance and Linear and Capped Incentive Compensation Payouts — The Compensation Committee establishes financial performance goals which are

generally used to plot a linear payout formula for annual incentive compensation, eliminating payout “cliffs” between the established performance goals. Threshold levels of performance required to earn short-term incentives are tied to achievement of financial results that correlate to our operating income. The maximum payout for the annual incentive compensation is capped at 200% of target.

 

  

Use of Multiple and Appropriate Performance Metrics — Utilizing diversified performance measures helps prevent compensation opportunities from being overly weighted toward the performance

result of a single measure. In general, our incentive programs are historically based on a mix of financial and individual goals. In recent years our primary financial performance metric has been operating income. Compared to other financial metrics, operating income is a measure of the profitability of our business which helps drive accountability at our operating segments, thereby reducing risks related to incentive compensation by putting the focus on quality of revenues, not quantity. Additionally, commencing in 2011, the Compensation Committee utilized relative total shareholder return and return on invested capital as additional performance measures.

 

  

Stock Ownership Guidelines — Our executive officers and directors are subject to sharestock ownership guidelines, which also helpshelp promote longer-term perspectives and align the interests of our executive officers and directors with those of our stockholders. In 2010, we increased the stock ownership requirements for both our executive officers and nonemployee directors to further emphasize this alignment of interests.

Reflecting these compensation objectives, compensation arrangements in 2011 for our Continuing Named Executives resulted in:2013 provided for:

 

Three elements of target total direct compensation within approximately 15% of the median compensation for officers in comparable positions in our market, with the exception of Mr. Johnson, whose target total direct compensation was set slightly above market due to his demonstrated leadership following the Spin-off;— annual base salary, annual incentive and long-term incentives;

 

performance-based compensation accounting for over 60% ofNEO target total direct compensation, on average, as compared to 46% in 2010;being comprised 64% of performance-based compensation (excluding Mr. Dickson, who joined McDermott on October 31, 2013);

NEO annual incentives being comprised 100% of performance-based compensation (excluding Mr. Dickson); and

 

performance-based compensation, accounting for 75% ofNEO target long-term incentive, or LTI, compensation as compared to 50% in 2010.being comprised 75% of performance-based compensation (excluding Mr. Dickson).

McDermott’s financial performance2013 Significant Events. Significant events in 2011 included:2013 included the following:

Strategic Growth Plan Actions.

 

Consolidated revenueThe acquisition in March 2013 of $3.4 billion, as comparedDeepsea Group Limited, a United Kingdom-based company that provides subsea and other engineering services to $2.4 billion for 2010;

Consolidated operating income of $250.7 million, as compared to $314.9 million for 2010; andinternational energy companies, significantly expanding our subsea expertise.

 

Consolidated ROICThe formation of 8%.our subsea division for business development, bidding and project execution and increased oversight responsibility for subsea assets.

Operationally,

The restructuring of our Atlantic operations involving, among other things, reductions of management, administrative, fabrication and engineering personnel, and a plan to discontinue utilization of the Morgan City fabrication facility.

Executive Changes.During the fourth quarter of 2013, Mr. David Dickson was appointed as McDermott’s President and Chief Executive Officer and became a member of the Board of Directors, following the retirements of Mr. Stephen M. Johnson, McDermott’s former Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer and Mr. John T. McCormack, McDermott’s former Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer;

2013 Metrics. Although McDermott had revenues for the year ended December 31, 2013 of $2.7 billion and year-end backlog of $4.8 billion, the Company recognized an operating loss in 2011 McDermott also:2013.

Realizable Value of Performance-Based Awards.

In accordance with our Compensation Committee’s philosophy and program, these financial results provided for:

 

Achieved backlog of $3.88 billionNo NEO annual bonus awards being earned with respect to 2013.

NEO stock options granted in 2011, 2012 and 2013 having no realizable value as of December 31, 2011;2013.

 

Achieved substantial growth in our Asia Pacific segment, as reflected by increases of over 115% in both revenue and operating income in the segment as compared to 2010;

Amended/refinanced our credit facility to extend the scheduled maturity date, provide additional liquidity, obtain improved covenants and reduce fees; and

Established a joint venture entity which we co-own with two Brazilian companies, which joint venture plans to bid to provide engineering, procurement and construction (“EPC”) services to the oil and gas industry offshore Brazil.

Under McDermott’s 2011 compensation program,

None of the Continuing Named Executives were awarded bonuses under the 2011 EICP. Based on McDermott’s 2011 financial results, the Continuing Named Executives were eligible to earn approximately 18% of their respective 2011 target EICP compensation, subject to the assessment of their respective individual goals. Upon the recommendation of Mr. Johnson based on the 2011 financial results, the Compensation Committee, in the exercise of its discretion, determined that, although the Continuing Named Executives and other participants in the EICP were eligible to earn approximately 18% of their target EICP compensation, 0% would be awarded in light of the financial results. Instead, as recommended by Mr. Johnson, the Compensation Committee determined that the bonus amounts that otherwise would have been payable should effectively be returned to the shareholders in the form of additional operating income. In making this recommendation and decision, respectively, Mr. Johnson and the Compensation Committee considered the increase in 2011

revenues of approximately 43%, together with the decrease in 2011 operating income by approximately 20% from 2010 levels, the continued performance issues in the Atlantic segment and issues relating to several projects in other segments.

In making its decision not to award bonuses for 2011 under the EICP, the Compensation Committee noted that Mr. Johnson had achieved the individual performance component, based on the Governance Committee’s assessment of Mr. Johnson’s individual performance against stated goals, and each of Messrs. Elders, Carlson and McCormack and Ms. Hinrichs had achieved their respective

individual performance components based on Mr. Johnson’s assessment of their respective individual performance achievements against stated goals, with the exception of the financial performance goal and a safety goal for Mr. McCormack.

As of December 31, 2011, (1) the estimated payout as a percent of target for theNEO performance shares granted in 2011, was 0%,2012 and (2) the share price of our common stock had not exceeded the strike price of the stock options granted in 2011, although as noted below, the estimated payout and share price may change during the term of the performance shares and stock options.

The following table summarizes the 2011 performance-based compensation opportunities for each of our Continuing Named Executives as compared to the2013 having no realizable value of such opportunities as of December 31, 2011:2013.

2011 Performance-Based Compensation Opportunity vs. Realizable Value as of December 31, 2011

    EICP(1)   Performance
Shares(2)(3)
   Stock
Options(2)(3)
   Total 

S. M. Johnson

        

2011 Opportunity

  $942,603    $2,382,132    $944,089    $4,268,824  

2011 Realizable Value

  $0    $0    $0    $0  

P. L. Elders

        

2011 Opportunity

  $336,911    $595,438    $236,000    $1,168,349  

2011 Realizable Value

  $0    $0    $0    $0  

G. L. Carlson

        

2011 Opportunity

  $199,233    $238,175    $94,406    $531,814  

2011 Realizable Value

  $0    $0    $0    $0  

L. K. Hinrichs

        

2011 Opportunity

  $261,381    $535,894    $212,421    $1,009,696  

2011 Realizable Value

  $0    $0    $0    $0  

J. T. McCormack

        

2011 Opportunity

  $274,549    $634,020    $253,847    $1,162,416  

2011 Realizable Value

  $0    $0    $0    $0  

(1)2011 Opportunity Values for EICP are disclosed at the Continuing Named Executives’ target EICP award. The 2011 Opportunity Value provided for Mr. McCormack reflects his target EICP award following his promotion to EVP, COO.

(2)2011 Opportunity Values for performance shares and stock options are disclosed at the grant date fair value of the respective awards.

(3)The 2011 Realizable Values shown above are measured as of December 31, 2011. However, the amount of the performance shares granted in 2011 that ultimately vest, if any, will be determined by reference to our total shareholder return over three-, four- and five-year periods. See “Long-Term Incentive Compensation — Analysis of 2011 Equity Grants.” The vesting of any of these performance shares would impact the future Realizable Value of these performance share awards. In addition, an increase in our stock price compared to our stock price at December 31, 2011 may impact the future Realizable Value of the stock option awards granted in 2011.

For the reasons discussed above, the Board of Directors unanimously recommends that stockholders vote FOR the following resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Named Executives,NEOs, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of RegulationS-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and

accompanying narrative discussion in McDermott’s proxy statement relating to its 20122014 annual meeting of stockholders, is hereby APPROVED.”

While the resolution is non-binding, the Board of Directors plans to consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions.

 

 

VOTE TO APPROVE THE 2014 LTIP

(ITEM 3)

We are asking our stockholders to approve the adoption of the 2014 McDermott International, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2014 LTIP”).

On March 6, 2014, our Board of Directors adopted, subject to stockholder approval, a new long-term incentive plan, the 2014 LTIP, to replace the 2009 LTIP. We intend to reserve 6,600,000 shares for issuance pursuant to awards under the 2014 LTIP. If our stockholders approve the 2014 LTIP, shares that are available for issuance under the 2009 LTIP will become available for issuance under the 2014 LTIP, and no additional grants will be made pursuant to the 2009 LTIP or any other prior plans.

A summary of the 2014 LTIP is set forth below. This summary is, however, qualified in its entirety by reference to the text of the 2014 LTIP, which is attached as Appendix A to this Proxy Statement.

REASON FOR THE PROPOSAL

The 2014 LTIP is intended to replace the 2009 LTIP and is needed to continue our equity compensation program. As of March 7, 2014, there were 774,507 shares of common stock remaining available for grant under the 2009 LTIP, which will become available for issuance under the 2014 LTIP assuming the 2014 LTIP is approved. Any previously granted awards that are outstanding under the 2009 LTIP will remain outstanding in accordance with their terms. As of March 7, 2014, under the 2009 LTIP there were 6,022,631 restricted stock units and performance shares outstanding, and 3,599,826 stock options outstanding, with such stock options having a weighted average remaining term of 3.9 years and weighted average exercise price of $11.85. There are no previously granted awards outstanding under any other prior plans.

If the 2014 LTIP is not approved by the stockholders, we will not be able to continue our equity-based long-term incentive program, and we may be required to increase significantly the cash component of our executive compensation program in order to remain competitive and adequately compensate our employees. The lack of an equity compensation program would eliminate a key tool in our ability to ensure alignment between executive and stockholder interests.

We believe that incentive awards are critical to attracting, retaining and engaging highly qualified employees and to aligning their financial interests with the financial interests of our stockholders. Our Board recommends that stockholders approve the 2014 LTIP to allow us to continue to provide such incentives.

Stockholder approval of the 2014 LTIP will also constitute approval for purposes of satisfying the stockholder approval requirements (1) under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and the rules and regulations thereunder so that the Compensation Committee has the discretion to grant equity-based awards in the future under the 2014 LTIP that meet the requirements of “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) and (2) under Section 422 of the Code so that the Compensation Committee may grant incentive stock options, or ISOs.

KEY CHANGES FROM THE 2009 LTIP

We believe that the 2009 LTIP has been effective in attracting and retaining highly-qualified employees and non-employee directors and has provided incentives that align the economic interests of participants with those of our stockholders. The 2014 LTIP retains most of the material terms of the 2009 LTIP, with certain changes to better align our plan with current trends related to plan design and corporate governance, as illustrated by the table below:

Provision2009 LTIP2014 LTIP

Number of shares reserved

9 million6.6 million

Share counting provisions

No special provisions for restricted stock or restricted stock units

Each performance share, share of restricted stock or restricted stock unit counts as 1.69 shares against the total share limit; shares tendered or withheld as payment for tax withholding will become available again under the plan

Application to options not expressly addressed

Expressly provides that shares tendered or withheld as payment for tax withholding or the exercise price of a stock option will not become available again under the plan

Change in control definition

Includes stockholder approval of asset saleAsset sale trigger requires consummation of asset sale

Option expiration protection

Not addressedExtends term of outstanding stock options for additional 30 days if they would otherwise expire during trading blackout period under McDermott’s insider trading policy

Dividend equivalents

Available for restricted stock units; not addressed as to stock optionsExpressly prohibited with respect to stock options; performance shares subject to the same vesting and performance restrictions as the performance shares

Director award limitations

Not addressedGrant date fair value of director awards may not exceed $500,000 per director in any calendar year

BEST PRACTICE FEATURES OF THE 2014 LTIP

Independent Board Oversight. The Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors, composed solely of independent directors, will approve all grants made under the 2014 LTIP, provided, however, that the Compensation Committee may delegate to any committee of the

Board, to the Chief Executive Officer and to any of our other senior officers its duties under the 2014 LTIP pursuant to such conditions or limitations as the Committee may establish. We expect that such delegation will not extend to the authority to make awards to our officers.

No Repricing of Options. The 2014 LTIP prohibits repricing, replacement and regranting of stock options at lower prices unless approved by our stockholders.

No Discounted Options. Stock options may not be granted with an exercise price below the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the date of grant.

No Dividends on Options. Dividends and dividend equivalents may not be paid or accrued on stock options.

Limited terms for Options. Stock options granted under the 2014 LTIP are limited to 7-year terms.

Awards may be subject to future clawback or recoupment. All awards granted under the 2014 LTIP will be subject to any clawback policy we have or adopt.

No Transferability. Awards generally may not be transferred, except by will or the laws of descent and distribution, unless approved by the Compensation Committee.

No “Evergreen” Provision. Shares authorized for issuance under the 2014 LTIP will not be automatically replenished. Any additional shares to be issued over and above the amount for which we are seeking authorization must be approved by our stockholders.

No Automatic Grants. There are no automatic grants to new participants or “reload” grants when outstanding awards are exercised, expire or are forfeited.

No Tax Gross-ups. Participants do not receive tax gross-ups under the 2014 LTIP.

NUMBER OF SHARES REQUESTED

In determining the number of shares to make available under the 2014 LTIP, the Compensation Committee considered the key historical stock usage data under the 2009 LTIP described above, the advice of Pay Governance, LLC, its independent compensation consultant, and the estimated value transfer cost of the 2014 LTIP. The Compensation Committee also considered many factors that affect the number of shares required for long-term incentive equity awards, such as changes in stock price over the life of the plan, the number of participants in the program and the size of awards to each participant. Considering all of these factors, the Compensation Committee determined that 6.6 million shares is a prudent amount to satisfy the long-term incentive goals of the 2014 LTIP and also meet the expectations of the stockholders for minimal levels of dilution.

If the 2014 LTIP is approved, the total dilution from all outstanding awards under the 2009 LTIP as of March 7, 2014 and the 6.6 million shares requested for issuance under the 2014 LTIP would be approximately 6.8% of the common shares outstanding as of March 7, 2014.

SECTION 162(M) OF THE CODE

The 2014 LTIP has been structured in a manner such that awards granted under it can satisfy the requirements for “performance-based” compensation within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code. However, there can be no guarantee that amounts payable under the 2014 LTIP will be treated as qualified “performance-based” compensation under Section 162(m). In general, under Section 162(m), in order for us to be able to deduct compensation in excess of $1,000,000 paid in any one year to our chief executive officer or any of our three other most highly compensated executive officers (other than our chief financial officer), such compensation must qualify as “performance-based.” One of the requirements of “performance-based” compensation for purposes of Section 162(m) is that the material terms of the performance goals under which compensation may be paid be disclosed to and approved by the Company’s stockholders every five years. For purposes of

Section 162(m), the material terms include (1) the individuals eligible to receive compensation, (2) a description of the business criteria on which the performance goal is based, and (3) the maximum amount of compensation that can be paid to an individual under the performance goal. With respect to the various types of awards under the 2014 LTIP, each of these aspects is discussed below, and stockholder approval of the 2014 LTIP will be deemed to constitute approval of each of these aspects of the 2014 LTIP for purposes of the approval requirements of Section 162(m).

SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF THE 2014 LTIP

Administration. The 2014 LTIP will be administered by the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee will select the participants and determine the type or types of awards and the number of shares or units to be optioned or granted to each participant under the 2014 LTIP. All or part of the award may be subject to conditions established by the Compensation Committee, which may include continued service with our company, achievement of specific business objectives, increases in specified indices, attainment of specified growth rates or other comparable measures of performance. The Compensation Committee will have full and final authority to implement the 2014 LTIP and may, from time to time, adopt rules and regulations in order to carry out the terms of the 2014 LTIP. As permitted by law, the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee may delegate its duties under the 2014 LTIP to another committee of the Board of Directors or to our chief executive officer and other senior officers.

Eligibility. Members of the Board of Directors, executive officers and employees of our company and its subsidiaries, as well as consultants, are eligible to participate in the 2014 LTIP. The Compensation Committee will select the participants for the 2014 LTIP. Any participant may receive more than one award under the 2014 LTIP. Presently, 251 current and former employees and 11 current and former members of the Board of Directors participate in the 2009 LTIP. Because the 2014 LTIP provides for broad discretion in selecting participants and in making awards, however, the total number of persons who will participate going forward and the respective benefits to be awarded to them cannot be determined at this time.

Shares Available for Issuance through the 2014 LTIP. Shares approved under the 2009 LTIP which have not been awarded as of the date the 2014 LTIP is approved by stockholders will become available for issuance under the 2014 LTIP. As of March 7, 2014, 774,507 shares remained available for issuance under the 2009 LTIP. By this proposal, we are asking stockholders for authorization to reserve an additional 6,600,000 shares for issuance under the 2014 LTIP. No awards will be made under the 2014 LTIP until stockholders have approved the 2014 LTIP.

The 2014 LTIP provides for a number of forms of stock-based compensation, as further described below. Awards settled in shares other than through stock options (such as restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance shares) will count against the 2014 LTIP’s overall share limit as 1.69 shares for each share subject to such award. Stock options will count against the share limitation on a 1:1 basis. The 2014 LTIP also permits the reuse or reissuance by the 2014 LTIP of shares of common stock underlying canceled, expired, terminated or forfeited awards of stock-based compensation granted under the 2014 LTIP or the 2009 LTIP. Shares tendered or withheld as payment for tax withholding or the exercise price of a stock option will not become available again under the 2014 LTIP.

The Compensation Committee shall make appropriate adjustments in the number and kind of shares that may be issued, the number and kind of shares subject to outstanding awards, the exercise or other applicable price and other value determinations applicable to outstanding awards under the 2014 LTIP to reflect any amendment to the 2014 LTIP, stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization, merger, consolidation, reorganization, combination or exchange of shares or other similar event.

Types of Awards Under the 2014 LTIP. The Compensation Committee may award to participants incentive and nonqualified stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance shares and performance units. The forms of awards are described in greater detail below.

Stock Options. The Compensation Committee will have discretion to award incentive stock options and nonqualified stock options. A stock option is a right to purchase a specified number of shares of common stock at a specified grant price. An incentive stock option is intended to qualify as such under Section 422 of the Code. Under the 2014 LTIP, no participant may be granted options during any fiscal year that are exercisable for more than 1,500,000 shares of our common stock. The exercise price of an option may not be less than the fair market value of the underlying shares of common stock on the date of grant. Subject to the specific terms of the 2014 LTIP, the Compensation Committee will have discretion to determine the number of shares, the exercise price, the terms and conditions of exercise, whether an option will qualify as an incentive stock option under the Code and set such additional limitations on and terms of option grants as it deems appropriate.

Options granted to participants under the 2014 LTIP will expire at such times as the Compensation Committee determines at the time of the grant, but no option will be exercisable later than seven years from the date of grant. Each option award agreement will set forth the extent to which the participant will have the right to exercise the option following termination of the participant’s employment. The termination provisions will be determined within the discretion of the Compensation Committee, may not be uniform among all participants and may reflect distinctions based on the reasons for termination of employment. Dividend equivalents do not attach to stock options.

Upon the exercise of an option granted under the 2014 LTIP, the option price is payable in full to us (1) in cash; (2) if permitted in the award agreement, by tendering shares having a fair market value at the time of exercise equal to the total option price (provided such shares have been held for at least six months prior to their tender); (3) if permitted in the award agreement, by a combination of (1) and (2); or (4) by any other method approved by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion at the time of the grant and as set forth in the related award agreement.

Restricted Stock. The Compensation Committee also will be authorized to award restricted shares of common stock under the 2014 LTIP on such terms and conditions as it shall establish. Although recipients will have the right to vote restricted shares from the date of grant, they will not have the right to sell or otherwise transfer the shares during the applicable period of restriction or until earlier satisfaction of other conditions imposed by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion. The award agreement will specify the periods of restriction, restrictions based on achievement of specific performance objectives, restrictions under applicable federal or state securities laws and such other terms it deems appropriate. Unless the Compensation Committee otherwise determines, participants will receive dividends on their shares of restricted stock. The Compensation Committee in its discretion may apply any restrictions to the dividends that it deems appropriate.

Each award agreement for restricted stock will set forth the extent to which the participant will have the right to retain unvested shares of restricted stock following termination of the participant’s employment. These provisions will be determined in the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee, need not be uniform among all shares of restricted stock issued pursuant to the 2014 LTIP and may reflect distinctions based on reasons for termination of employment.

Restricted Stock Units. An award of a restricted stock unit constitutes an agreement by us to deliver shares of our common stock or to pay an amount equal to the fair market value of a share of common stock for each restricted stock unit to a participant in the future in consideration of the performance of services. Restricted stock units may be granted by the Compensation Committee on such terms and conditions as it may establish. The restricted stock unit award agreement will specify

the vesting period or periods, the specific performance objectives and such other conditions as may apply to the award. During the applicable vesting period, participants will have no voting rights with respect to the shares of common stock underlying a restricted stock unit grant. However, participants shall, unless the Compensation Committee otherwise determines, receive dividend equivalents on the shares underlying their restricted stock unit grant in the form of cash or additional restricted stock units if a dividend is paid with respect to shares of our common stock.

Each award agreement for restricted stock units will set forth the extent to which the participant will have the right to retain unvested restricted stock units following termination of employment. These provisions will be determined in the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee, need not be uniform among all participants and may reflect distinctions based on reasons for termination of employment.

No more than 1,500,000 shares of common stock may be granted in the form of awards of restricted stock and restricted stock units to any participant in any fiscal year.

Performance Shares and Performance Units. Performance units and performance shares are forms of performance awards that are subject to the attainment of one or more pre-established performance goals during a designated performance period. Performance units and performance shares may be granted by the Compensation Committee at any time in such amounts and on such terms as the Compensation Committee determines. Each performance unit will have an initial value that is established by the Compensation Committee at the time of grant. Each performance share will have an initial value equal to the fair market value of a share of our common stock on the date of grant. The Compensation Committee in its discretion will determine the applicable performance period and will establish performance goals for any given performance period. When the performance period expires, the holder of performance shares or performance units will be entitled to receive a payout on the units and/or shares earned over the performance period based on the extent to which the performance goals have been achieved. Participants holding performance shares and/or performance units are not entitled to receive dividend equivalents for dividends declared with respect to shares of our common stock.

Payments may be made in cash or in shares of common stock that have an aggregate fair market value equal to the earned performance units or performance shares on the last day of the applicable performance period. Each award agreement will set forth the extent to which the participant will have the right to receive a payout of these performance shares and/or performance units following termination of the participant’s employment. The termination provisions will be determined by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion, may not be uniform among all participants and may reflect distinctions based on the reasons for termination of employment.

No more than 1,500,000 shares of common stock may be granted in the form of awards of performance shares to any participant in any fiscal year. No more than an aggregate cash payout value of $6,000,000 may be granted to any participant with respect to performance units granted in any fiscal year, as valued on the date of each grant.

Director Awards. Awards to nonemployee directors may be in any of the forms of awards described above, other than incentive stock options. The aggregate grant value of awards to nonemployee directors may not exceed $500,000 per director in any calendar year.

Performance Measures. The Compensation Committee may grant awards under the 2014 LTIP to eligible employees subject to the attainment of specified performance measures. The number of performance-based awards granted to an officer or employee in any year will be determined by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion, subject to the limitations set forth in the 2014 LTIP. The

value of each performance-based award will be determined based on the achievement of the pre-established, objective performance goals during each performance period. The duration of a performance period is set by the Compensation Committee. A new performance period may begin every year, or at more frequent or less frequent intervals, as determined by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee will establish, in writing, the objective performance goals applicable to the valuation of performance-based awards granted in each performance period, the performance measures that will be used to determine the achievement of those performance goals and any formulas or methods to be used to determine the value of the performance-based awards.

Performance measures will be defined by the Compensation Committee on a consolidated, group or division basis and/or in comparison to one or more peer groups or indices. Performance measures selected by the Compensation Committee will be one or more of the following: revenue and income measures (including revenue, gross margin, income from operations, net income, net sales and earnings per share), expense measures (including costs of goods sold, sales, general and administrative expenses and overhead costs), operating measures (including bookings, volume, margin, breakage and shrinkage, productivity and market share), cash flow measures (including net cash flow from operating activities and working capital); liquidity measures (including earnings before or after the effect of certain items such as interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, cash flow and free cash flow), leverage measures (including equity ratio and net debt), market measures (including those relating to market price, stock price, total shareholder return and market capitalization measures), return measures (including return on equity, return on assets, cash flow return on assets, cash flow return on capital, cash flow return on equity, return on capital and return on invested capital), corporate value measures (including compliance, safety, environmental and personnel matters), and measures relating to acquisitions, dispositions or customer satisfaction.

Following the end of a performance period, the Compensation Committee will determine the value of the performance-based awards granted for the period based on its determination of the degree of attainment of the pre-established objective performance goals. The Compensation Committee will also have discretion to reduce (but not to increase) the value of a performance-based award to “Covered Employees,” as defined in Section 162(m) of the Code.

Deferrals. The Compensation Committee will have the discretion to provide for the deferral of an award or to permit participants to elect to defer payment of some or all types of awards in a manner consistent with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code.

Change in Control. The treatment of outstanding awards upon the occurrence of a change in control (as defined in the 2014 LTIP) will be determined in the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee and will be described in the applicable award agreements and need not be uniform among all awards granted under the 2014 LTIP.

Adjustment and Amendments. The 2014 LTIP provides for appropriate adjustments in the number of shares of our common stock subject to awards and available for future awards, as well as the maximum award limitations under the 2014 LTIP, in the event of changes in our outstanding common stock by reason of a merger, stock split, or certain other events. The 2014 LTIP may be modified, altered, suspended or terminated by the Board of Directors at any time and for any purpose that the Board of Directors deems appropriate, but no amendment to the 2014 LTIP shall adversely affect any outstanding awards without the affected participant’s consent, and stockholder approval is required if an amendment will materially modify the 2014 LTIP or is otherwise required by applicable law.

Transferability. Except as otherwise specified in a participant’s award agreement, no award granted pursuant to, and no right to payment under, the 2014 LTIP will be assignable or transferable by a 2014 LTIP participant except by will or by the laws of descent and distribution or pursuant to a

qualified domestic relations order, and any right granted under the 2014 LTIP will be exercisable during a participant’s lifetime only by the participant or by the participant’s guardian or legal representative.

Duration of the 2014 LTIP. The 2014 LTIP will remain in effect until all options and rights granted thereunder have been satisfied or terminated pursuant to the terms of the 2014 LTIP and all performance periods for performance-based awards granted thereunder have been completed. However, in no event will any award be granted under the 2014 LTIP on or after May 6, 2024.

United States Federal Income Tax Consequences

The following summary is based on current interpretations of existing federal income tax laws. The discussion below is not purported to be complete, and it does not discuss the tax consequences arising in the context of the participant’s death or the income tax laws of any local, state or foreign country in which the participant’s income or gain may be taxable.

Stock Options. Some of the options issuable under the 2014 LTIP may constitute incentive stock options within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code, while other options granted under the 2014 LTIP may be nonqualified stock options. The Code provides for tax treatment of stock options qualifying as incentive stock options that may be more favorable to employees than the tax treatment accorded nonqualified stock options.

Generally, upon the grant or exercise of an incentive stock option, the optionee will recognize no income for United States federal income tax purposes. The difference between the exercise price of the incentive stock option and the fair market value of the stock at the time of exercise is, however, an item of tax preference that may require payment of an alternative minimum tax. If the participant disposes of shares acquired by exercise of an incentive stock option either before the expiration of two years from the date the options are granted or within one year after the issuance of shares upon exercise of the incentive stock option (the “holding periods”), the participant will recognize in the year of disposition: (1) ordinary income to the extent that the lesser of either (a) the fair market value of the shares on the date of option exercise or (b) the amount realized upon disposition exceeds the option price and (2) capital gain to the extent the amount realized upon disposition exceeds the fair market value of the shares on the date of option exercise. If the shares are sold after expiration of the holding periods, the participant generally will recognize capital gain or loss equal to the difference between the amount realized upon disposition and the option price.

An optionee will recognize no income on the grant of a nonqualified stock option. Upon the exercise of a nonqualified stock option, the optionee will recognize ordinary taxable income (subject to withholding) in an amount equal to the difference between the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise and the exercise price. Upon any sale of such shares by the optionee, any difference between the sale price and the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise of the nonqualified option will be treated generally as capital gain or loss.

No deduction is available to us upon the grant or exercise of an incentive stock option (although a deduction may be available if the employee sells the shares so purchased before the applicable holding period expires), whereas upon exercise of a nonqualified stock option, we are entitled to a deduction in an amount equal to the income recognized by the optionee. Except with respect to death or disability of an optionee, an optionee has three months after termination of employment in which to exercise an incentive stock option and retain favorable tax treatment at exercise. An option exercised more than three months after an optionee’s termination of employment (other than upon death or disability) cannot qualify for the tax treatment accorded incentive stock options; such options would be treated as nonqualified stock options instead.

Restricted Stock. A participant generally recognizes no taxable income at the time of an award of restricted stock. A participant may, however, make an election under Section 83(b) of the Code to have

the grant taxed as compensation income at the date of receipt, with the result that any future appreciation or depreciation in the value of the shares of stock granted may be taxed as capital gain or loss on a subsequent sale of the shares. If the participant does not make a Section 83(b) election, the grant will be taxed as compensation income at the full fair market value on the date the restrictions imposed on the shares expire. Unless a participant makes a Section 83(b) election, any dividends paid to the participant on the shares of restricted stock will generally be compensation income to the participant and deductible by us as compensation expense. In general, we will receive an income tax deduction for any compensation income taxed to the participant. To the extent a participant realizes capital gains, as described above, we will not be entitled to any deduction for federal income tax purposes.

Restricted Stock Units. A participant who is granted a restricted stock unit will recognize no income upon grant of the restricted stock unit. At the time the underlying shares of common stock (or cash in lieu thereof) are delivered to a participant, the participant will realize compensation income equal to the full fair market value of the shares received. We will be entitled to an income tax deduction corresponding to the compensation income recognized by the participant.

Performance Share or Performance Unit Awards. A participant who is granted a performance share or a performance unit award will recognize no income upon grant of the performance share or a performance unit award. At the time the common stock is received as payment in respect of a performance share or performance unit award, the participant will realize compensation income equal to the fair market value of the shares received. We will be entitled to an income tax deduction corresponding to the compensation income recognized by the participant.

Certain Tax Code Limitations on Deductibility. Section 162(m) of the Code provides that certain compensation received in any year by a “covered employee” in excess of $1,000,000 is non-deductible by us for federal income tax purposes. Section 162(m) provides an exception, however, for “performance-based compensation.” The 2014 LTIP permits the Compensation Committee to structure grants and awards made under the 2014 LTIP to “covered employees” as performance-based compensation that is exempt from the limitation of Section 162(m) of the Code. However, the Compensation Committee may award compensation that is or may become non-deductible, and expects to consider whether it believes such grants are in our best interest, balancing tax efficiency with long-term strategic objectives.

Section 409A. Section 409A of the Code generally provides that any deferred compensation arrangement must satisfy specific requirements, both in operation and in form, regarding (1) the timing of payment, (2) the election of deferrals, and (3) restrictions on the acceleration of payment. Failure to comply with Section 409A of the Code may result in the early taxation (plus interest) to the participant of deferred compensation and the imposition of a 20% penalty on the participant on such deferred amounts included in the participant’s income. We intend to structure awards under the Plan in a manner that is designed to be exempt from or comply with Section 409A of the Code.

Change in Control. The acceleration of the exercisability or the vesting of a grant or award upon the occurrence of a change in control may result in an “excess parachute payment” within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code. A “parachute payment” occurs when an employee receives payments contingent upon a change in control that exceed an amount equal to three times his or her “base amount.” The term “base amount” generally means the average annual compensation paid to such employee during the five-year period preceding the change in control. An “excess parachute payment” is the excess of all parachute payments made to the employee on account of a change in control over the employee’s base amount. If any amount received by an employee is characterized as an excess parachute payment, the employee is subject to a 20% excise tax on the amount of the excess, and we are denied a deduction with respect to such excess payment.

New Plan Benefits

The benefits that will be received under the 2014 LTIP by particular individuals or groups are not determinable at this time. Awards granted under the 2014 LTIP are within the discretion of the Compensation Committee, and the Compensation Committee has not determined future awards or who might receive them. No awards or grants have been made under the 2014 LTIP that are contingent on stockholder approval of the 2014 LTIP.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

 

Plan Category  

Number of
Securities to be
Issued Upon

Exercise of
Outstanding

Options, Warrants

and Rights(1)

  

Weighted-
Average

Exercise Price of

Outstanding

Options, Warrants

and Rights

  

Number of

Securities

Remaining

Available for

Future
Issuance

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

  9,622,457  11.85  774,507

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

  N/A  N/A  N/A

Total

  9,622,457  11.85  774,507

 

(1)

As of December 31, 2013, there were approximately 8.7 million securities issued as outstanding shares of restricted stock, or to be issued upon exercise or vesting of outstanding options, restricted stock units or performance shares. The number of securities in this column reflects the net adjustments resulting from awards which were vested, exercised, cancelled, forfeited and granted in the period between December 31, 2013 and March 7, 2014 and does not include securities issued and outstanding as restricted stock.

Recommendation and Vote Required

Our Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” approval of this proposal. The proxy holders will vote all proxies received for approval of this proposal unless instructed otherwise. Our directors have an interest in and may benefit from the adoption of this proposal because they are eligible to receive awards under the 2014 LTIP. Approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote and actually voting on this proposal at the Annual Meeting. In general, brokers do not have discretionary authority on proposals relating to equity compensation plans. Therefore, absent instructions from you, your broker may not vote your shares on this proposal. Broker non-votes and abstentions will have no effect on the vote.

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORTAUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The Board of Directors appoints an Audit Committee to review McDermott International, Inc.’s financial matters. Each member of the Audit Committee meets the independence requirements established by the New York Stock Exchange. The Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of McDermott’s independent registered public accounting firm. We are also responsible for recommending to the Board that McDermott’s audited financial statements be included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year.

In making our recommendation that McDermott’s financial statements be included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011,2013, we have taken the following steps:

 

We reviewed, and discussed with McDermott’s management and Deloitte & Touche LLP (“D&T”), McDermott’s audited consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2013, and consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, cash flows and stockholders’ equity for the year ended December 31, 2013.

We discussed with D&T, McDermott’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended December 31, 2011,2013, those matters required to be discussed by Statements on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended, issued byunder the Auditing Standards Boardstandards of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants,Company Accounting Oversight Board, including information regarding the scope and results of the audit. These communications and discussions are intended to assist us in overseeing the financial reporting and disclosure process.

We received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from D&T required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding D&T’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning D&T’s independence from McDermott, and have discussed with D&T its independence from McDermott. We also considered whether the provision of non-audit services to McDermott is compatible with D&T’s independence.

 

We conducted periodic executive sessions with D&T, with no members of McDermott management present during those discussions. D&T did not identify any material audit issues, questions or discrepancies, other than those previously discussed with management, which were resolved to the satisfaction of all parties.

 

We conducted periodic executive sessions with McDermott’s internal audit department and regularly received reports regarding McDermott’s internal control procedures.

 

We reviewed, and discussed with McDermott’s management and D&T, management’s report and D&T’s report and attestation on internal control over financial reporting, each of which was prepared in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

 

We received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from D&T required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding D&T’s communications with the audit committee concerning D&T’s independence from McDermott, and have discussed with D&T its independence from McDermott. We also considered whether the provision of non-audit services to McDermott is compatible with D&T’s independence.

We determined that there were no former D&T employees, who previously participated in the McDermott audit, engaged in a financial reporting oversight role at McDermott.

We reviewed, and discussed with McDermott’s management and D&T, McDermott’s audited consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2011, and consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, cash flows and stockholders’ equity for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Based on the reviews and actions described above, we recommended to the Board that McDermott’s audited financial statements be included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20112013 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

David A. Trice, Chairman

Stephen G. Hanks

D. Bradley McWilliams

William H. Schumann, III

RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC

RATIFICATIONOF APPOINTMENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMACCOUNTING FIRM FOR YEAR ENDING DECEMBER YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 20122014

(ITEM 3)ITEM 4)

Our Board of Directors has ratified the decision of the Audit Committee to appoint Deloitte & Touche LLP (“D&T”) to serve as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit our financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2012.2014. Although we are not required to seek stockholder approval of this appointment, it has been our practice to do so. No determination has been made as to what action the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors would take if our stockholders fail to ratify the appointment. Even if the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee retains discretion to appoint a new independent registered public accounting firm at any time if the Audit Committee concludes such a change would be in the best interests of McDermott. Representatives of D&T will be present at the Annual Meeting and will have an opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and to respond to appropriate questions.

For the years ended December 31, 20112013 and 2010,2012, McDermott paid Deloitte & ToucheD&T fees, including expenses and taxes, totaling $3,621,356$3,564,326 and $5,888,537,$3,888,337, which can be categorized as follows:

 

 

   2013 2012

Audit

  

The Audit fees for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were for professional services rendered for the audits of the consolidated financial statements of McDermott, the audit of McDermott’s internal control over financial reporting, statutory and subsidiary audits, reviews of the quarterly consolidated financial statements of McDermott and assistance with review of documents filed with the SEC.

 $3,482,866 $3,487,789

Audit-Related

  

The Audit-Related fees for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were for assurance and related services, employee benefit plan audits and advisory services related to Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 compliance.

 $16,330 $144,280

Tax

  

The Tax fees for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were for professional services rendered for consultations on various U.S. federal, state and international tax matters, international tax compliance and tax planning, and assistance with tax examinations.

 $65,130 $211,268

All Other

  

The fees for All Other services for the year ended December 31, 2012 were for professional services rendered for translation services and other advisory or consultation services not related to audit or tax.

 $0 $45,000

Total

 $3,564,326 $3,888,337

 

    2011   2010 

Audit

    

The Audit fees for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 were for professional services rendered for the audits of the consolidated financial statements of McDermott, the audit of McDermott’s internal control over financial reporting, statutory and subsidiary audits, reviews of the quarterly consolidated financial statements of McDermott and assistance with review of documents filed with the SEC.

  $3,220,477    $3,992,500(1) 

Audit-Related

    

The Audit-Related fees for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 were for assurance and related services, employee benefit plan audits and advisory services related to Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 compliance.

  $114,367    $518,205(2) 

Tax

    

The Tax fees for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 were for professional services rendered for consultations on various U.S. federal, state and international tax matters, international tax compliance and tax planning, and assistance with tax examinations.

  $286,512    $1,232,498(3) 

All Other

    

The fees for All Other services for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 were for professional services rendered for translation services and other advisory or consultation services not related to audit or tax.

  $0    $145,334(4) 

Total

  $3,621,356    $5,888,537  

(1)Audit fees for 2010 include $215,000 of fees paid by McDermott attributable to the audit of B&W.

(2)Audit-Related fees for 2010 include $480,205 of fees paid by McDermott attributable to audit-related services for B&W.

(3)Tax fees for 2010 include $91,800 of fees paid by McDermott attributable to tax services for B&W.

(4)All Other fees for 2010 include $140,000 of fees paid by McDermott attributable to other services for B&W.

It is the policy of our Audit Committee to preapprove all audit, review or attest engagements and permissible non-audit services to be performed by our independent registered public accounting firm, subject to, and in compliance with, thede minimisexception for non-audit services described in Section 10A(i)(1)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC. Our Audit Committee did not rely on thede minimisexception for any of the fees disclosed above.

Recommendation and Vote Required

Our Board of Directors recommends that stockholders vote “FOR” the ratification of the decision of our Audit Committee to appoint Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2012.2014. The proxy holders will vote all proxies received for approval of this proposal unless instructed otherwise. Approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote and actually voting on this proposal at the Annual Meeting. Because abstentions are not actual votes with respect to this proposal, they have no effect on the outcome of the vote on this proposal.

 

 

SECURITY OWNERSHIPSECURITY OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table sets forth the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned as of February 29, 201228, 2014 by each director or nominee as a director, and each Named ExecutiveNEO and all our directors and executive officers as a group, including shares that those persons have the right to acquire within 60 days on the vesting of restricted stock units or the exercise of stock options.

 

Name

Shares

Beneficially

Owned

John F. Bookout, III(1)

40,106

Roger A. Brown(2)

74,766

Gary L. Carlson(3)

44,423

Perry L. Elders(4)

41,030

Stephen G. Hanks

16,620

Liane K. Hinrichs(5)

205,715

Stephen M. Johnson(6)

514,834

D. Bradley McWilliams(7)

70,671

John T. McCormack(8)

70,845

John T. Nesser(9)

409,470

Thomas C. Schievelbein(10)

103,108

Mary Shafer-Malicki

6,790

David A. Trice

16,165

All directors and executive officers as a group (16 persons)(11)

1,938,545

 

Name  Shares that
may be
Acquired
on Stock
Option
Exercise
(1)
  Shares that
will be
Acquired
on Vesting of
Restricted
Stock Units
(2)
  Shares held
in Thrift
Plan
(3)
  

Total
Shares

Beneficially

Owned(4)

John F. Bookout, III

  6,105  —    —    214,228

Roger A. Brown

  38,085  —    —    98,888

Scott V. Cummins

  74,826  9,974  —    149,244

David Dickson

  —    —    —    537,482

Perry L. Elders

  136,097  17,587  25  192,276

Stephen G. Hanks

  —    —    —    40,742

Liane K. Hinrichs

  137,476  15,656  2,844  305,277

Stephen M. Johnson

  701,288  68,833  608  1,312,939

Gary P. Luquette

  —    —    —    8,683

D. Bradley McWilliams

  900  —    —    104,793

John T. McCormack

  120,771  32,653  1,246  195,465

Stewart A. Mitchell

  59,346  9,974  —    101,381

William H. Schumann, III

  —    —    —    18,980

Mary Shafer-Malicki

  —    —    —    30,912

David A. Trice

  —    —    —    40,287
             

All directors and executive officers as a group (17 persons)

  1,340,766  164,986  4,763  3,470,333

 

 

(1)Shares owned by Mr. Bookout include 6,105

This column includes shares of common stock that he maythe director or NEO has the right to acquire within 60 days on the exercise of stock options. As of February 28, 2014, the share price of our common stock ($8.33) did not exceed the strike price of any of the stock option awards in this column, excluding stock options as described above.

(2)Sharesto purchase 34,597 shares owned by Mr. Brown, include 38,085stock options to purchase 22,287 shares owned by Mr. Cummins, stock options to purchase 27,203 shares owned by Ms. Hinrichs, stock options to purchase 14,155 shares owned by Mr. McCormack and stock options to purchase 6,807 shares owned by Mr. Mitchell.

(2)

This column includes shares of common stock that he may acquire on the exercise of stock options, as described above.

(3)Shares owned by Mr. Carlson include 20,064 shares of common stock that he may acquire on the exercise of stock options, as described above, 14,654 shares of common stock that heeach applicable NEO will acquire onwithin 60 days following the vesting of restricted stock units, as described above, and 42units.

(3)

This column includes shares of common stock held in the NEO’s McDermott Thrift Plan.Plan account.

(4)

Shares beneficially owned by Mr. Elders include 28,274in all cases, with the exception of shares of common stock that he may acquire on the exercise of stock options, as described above, 3,250 shares of common stock that he will acquire on the vesting of restricted stock units, as described above, and 27 shares of common stock held in the McDermott Thrift Plan.

(5)Shares owned by Ms. Hinrichs include 64,772 shares of common stock that she may acquire on the exercise of stock options, as described above, 65,975 shares of common stock that she will acquire on the vesting of restricted stock units, as described above, and 2,980 shares of common stock held in the McDermott Thrift Plan.

(6)Shares owned by Mr. Johnson include 297,605 shares of common stock that he may acquire on the exercise of stock options, as described above, 44,831 shares of common stock that he will acquire on the vesting of restricted stock units, as described above, and 637 shares of common stock held in the McDermott Thrift Plan.

(7)Shares owned by Mr. McWilliams include 37,876 shares of common stock that he may acquire on the exercise of stock options, as described above.

(8)Shares owned by Mr. McCormack include 34,994 shares of common stock that he may acquire on the exercise of stock options, as described above, 34,546 shares of common stock that he will acquire on the vesting of restricted stock units, as described above, and 1,305 shares of common stock held in the McDermott Thrift Plan.

(9)Shares owned by Mr. Nesser include 62,121 shares of common stock held in a grantor retained annuity trust of which he is trustee and has indirect beneficial ownership, 69,717 shares of common stock that he may acquire on the exercise of stock options, as described above, and 8,276 shares of common stock that he will acquire on the vesting of restricted stock units.

(10)Shares owned by Mr. Schievelbein include 72,538 shares of common stock that he may acquire on the exercise of stock options, as described above.

(11)Sharesbeneficially owned by all directors and executive officers as a group, include 792,219constituted less than one percent of the outstanding shares of common stock that may be acquired on February 28, 2014, as determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3(d)(1) under the exerciseSecurities Exchange Act of stock options,1934. Shares beneficially owned by all directors and executive officers as described above, 213,188a group constituted approximately 1.46% of the outstanding shares of common stock that may be acquired on the vesting of restricted stock units, as described above, and 23,172 shares of common stock held in the McDermott Thrift Plan.February 28, 2014.

Shares beneficially owned in all cases constituted less than one percent of the outstanding shares of common stock on February 29, 2012, as determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3(d)(1) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

SECURITY OWNERSHIPSECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS

The following table furnishes information concerning all persons known by us to beneficially own 5% or more of our outstanding shares of common stock, which is our only class of voting stock outstanding:

 

Title of Class Name and Address of Beneficial Owner  

Amount
and

Nature of

Beneficial

Ownership

  

Percent of

Class(1)

Common Stock

T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.

100 E. Pratt Street

Baltimore, MD 21202

37,243,988(2)15.84

Common Stock

BlackRock, Inc.

40 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10022

15,391,846(3)6.55

Common Stock

 

Artisan Partners Holdings LP

875 East Wisconsin Avenue,

Suite 800500

Milwaukee, WI 53202

   13,551,80019,042,587(4)(2)  8.03%
5.77

Common Stock

 

PRIMECAP Management CompanyFairpointe Capital LLC

225 South Lake Ave., #400One N. Franklin, Suite 3300

Pasadena, CA 91101Chicago, IL 60606

   12,406,76015,428,133(5)(3)  6.51%
5.28

Common Stock

 

FMR LLCThe Vanguard Group

82 Devonshire Street100 Vanguard Blvd.

Boston, MA 02109Malvern, PA 19355

   11,820,61713,384,738(6)(4)  5.64%
5.03

Common Stock

BlackRock, Inc.

40 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10022

 

12,000,358(5)5.06%

 

(1)

Percent is based on outstanding shares of our common stock on February 29, 2012.28, 2014.

(2)

As reported on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 10, 2012.March 24, 2014. The Schedule 13G/A reports beneficial ownership of 37,243,988 shares of our common stock by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (“Price Associates”), which has sole voting power over 8,642,022 shares and sole dispositive power over 37,243,988 shares. These securities are owned by various individual and institutional investors, including T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund, which has sole voting power over 13,000,000 shares and sole dispositive power over no shares, for which Price Associates serves as an investment adviser with power to direct investments and/or sole power to vote the securities. For the purposes of the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Price Associates is deemed to be the beneficial owner of such securities; however, Price Associates expressly disclaims that it is, in fact, the beneficial owner of such securities.

(3)As reported on Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 13, 2012. The Schedule 13G/A reports beneficial ownership of 15,391,846 shares of our common stock and sole voting power and sole dispositive power over 15,391,846 shares.

(4)As reported on Schedule 13G filed on February 7, 2012. The Schedule 13G reports beneficial ownership of 13,551,80019,042,587 shares of our common stock, shared voting power over 13,219,90018,569,816 shares and shared dispositive power over 13,551,80019,042,587 shares by Artisan Partners Limited Partnership (“APLP”). The Schedule 13G/A also reports that each of Artisan Investments GP LLC (“Artisan Investments”), Artisan Partners Holdings LP (“Artisan Holdings”) and Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. (“APAM”), has shared voting power over 18,569,816 shares and shared dispositive power over 19,042,587 shares. The Schedule 13G/A also reports that Artisan Partners Funds, Inc. (“Artisan Funds”) has shared voting power over 14,334,599 shares and shared dispositive power over 14,334,599 shares. Artisan Funds is an Investment Company. APLP is an investment adviser. Artisan Holdings is the sole limited partner of APLP and the sole member of Artisan Investments; Artisan Investments is the general partner of APLP; APAM is the general partner of Artisan Holdings.

(5)(3)

As reported on a Schedule 13G/A13G filed with the SEC on February 13, 2012.7, 2014. The Schedule 13G/A13G reports beneficial ownership of 12,406,76015,428,133 shares, of our common stock, sole voting power over 6,929,16014,990,693 shares, sole dispositive power over 15,264,933 shares and shared dispositive power over 163,200 shares.

(4)

As reported on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 11, 2014. The Schedule 13G reports beneficial ownership of 13,384,738 shares, sole voting power over 149,192 shares, sole dispositive power over 13,253,246 shares and shared dispositive power over 131,492 shares.

(5)

As reported on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 3, 2014. The Schedule 13G reports beneficial ownership of 12,000,358 shares, sole voting power over 10,870,627 shares and sole dispositive power over 12,406,76012,000,358 shares.

(6)As reported on Schedule 13G filed jointly by FMR LLC, Edward C. Johnson 3d and Fidelity Management & Research Company with the SEC on February 14, 2012. According to the Schedule 13G, FMR LLC has sole voting power over 880,417 shares and sole dispositive power over 11,820,617 shares. Of the shares reported, 10,940,200 shares are beneficially owned by Fidelity Management & Research Company, an investment adviser and a wholly-owned subsidiary of FMR LLC, as a result of acting as investment advisor to various investment companies (collectively, the “Fidelity Funds”); and each of FMR LLC and Mr. Edward C. Johnson 3d exercise sole dispositive power and the Fidelity Funds’ Board of Trustees exercises sole voting power with respect to these shares. In addition, FMR LLC and Mr. Edward C. Johnson 3d each exercise sole dispositive power and sole voting power with respect to 454 shares.

 

 

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPSAND RELATED TRANSACTIONSCertain Relationships and Related Transactions

Pursuant to our Code of Business Conduct, all employees (including our Named Executives)NEOs) who have, or whose immediate family members have, any direct or indirect financial or other participation in any business that competes with, supplies goods or services to, or is a customer, of McDermott, are required to disclose to us and receive written approval from our Corporate Ethics and Compliance department prior to transacting such business. Our employees are expected to make reasoned and impartial decisions in the workplace. As a result, approval of the business is denied if we believe that the employee’s interest in such business could influence decisions relative to our business, or have the potential to adversely affect our business or the objective performance of the employee’s work. Our Corporate Ethics and Compliance department implements our Code of Business Conduct and related policies and the Governance Committee of our Board is responsible for overseeing our Ethics and Compliance Program, including compliance with our Code of Business Conduct. Our Board members are also responsible for complying with our Code of Business Conduct. Additionally, our Governance Committee is responsible for reviewing the professional occupations and associations of our Board members and reviews transactions between McDermott and other companies with which our Board members are affiliated. To obtain a copy of our Code of Business Conduct, please see the “Corporate Governance” section above in this proxy statement.

Our grant agreements for restricted stock units awarded under various long-term incentive plans provide that the withholding obligation of any applicable federal, state or other taxes that may be due on the vesting of those awards be satisfied by the grantee returning to us the number of such vested shares having a fair market value equal to the amount of such taxes. Accordingly, in the year ending December 31, 2012, this withholding method will apply to an aggregate of 209,208 shares held by Mr. Johnson, 16,137 shares held by Mr. Elders, 14,654 shares held by Mr. Carlson, 10,302 shares held by Mr. Cummins, 65,975 shares held by Ms. Hinrichs, 15,577 shares held by Mr. Daniel M. Houser, 37,232 shares held by Mr. McCormack, 10,057 shares held by Mr. Mitchell and 21,297 shares held by Mr. Roll.

In the year ended December 31, 2011, a similar withholding method applied with respect to certain of

our grant agreements, and Messrs. Johnson, Elders, Houser, McCormack, Mitchell, Nesser and Roll and Ms. Hinrichs irrevocably elected to satisfy withholding obligations relating to all or a portion of any applicable federal, state or other taxes that would be due on the vesting of certain shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units awarded under various long-term incentive plans that did not provide for a withholding method in the same manner. These elections were subject to the approval of the Compensation Committee of our Board, which approval was granted. Accordingly, this withholding method applied to an aggregate of 205,316 shares held by Mr. Johnson, 12,887 shares held by Mr. Elders, 13,137 shares held by Mr. Carlson, 9,165 shares held by Mr. Cummins, 119,901 shares held by Ms. Hinrichs, 19,452 shares held by Mr. Houser, 29,822 shares held by Mr. McCormack, 14,021 shares held by Mr. Mitchell, 85,423 shares held by Mr. Nesser and 21,479 shares held by Mr. Roll.

We expect any transfers reflecting shares of McDermott stock returned to us will be reported in the SEC filings made by those transferring holders who are obligated to report transactions in our securities under Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Additionally, duringDuring 2011, the Investment Committee of the McDermott Master Trust (the “Trust”), the funding vehicle underlying the Retirement Plan, entered into an agreement with BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A. (“BlackRock”), pursuant to which BlackRock agreed to manage the investment of a portion of the Trust assets. BlackRock is a subsidiary of BlackRock, Inc. and, collectively with certain other subsidiaries of BlackRock, Inc., owned approximately 6.55%5.1% of McDermott common stock on December 31, 20112013 as reported on BlackRock, Inc.’s Schedule 13G/A13G filed with the SEC on February 13, 2012.3, 2014. The amount of Trust assets under management with BlackRock may vary from time to time. As of December 31, 2011,2013, the value of the Trust assets under management with BlackRock was approximately $78.6$86.9 million. BlackRock receives a fee for investment management services for the portion of the Trust assets allocated to BlackRock. These fees are calculated quarterly in arrears by averaging the account’s prior three month-end market values and applying 25% of the annual fee schedule (6.0 basis points), or 1.5 basis points quarterly.

The Investment Committee of the Trust is a fiduciary of the Retirement Plan appointed by McDermott’s subsidiary that maintains the Retirement Plan. The Investment Committee is responsible for the management and control of the Trust assets and is authorized to appoint fund managers under the

terms of the Retirement Plan and the Trust. Selection of fund managers is performed with the assistance of a third partythird-party investment consulting firm, in accordance with an investment policy statement approved and adopted by the Investment Committee.

SECTIONSection 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP COMPLIANCEBeneficial Ownership Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our directors and executive officers, and persons who own 10% or more of our voting stock, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership of our equity securities with the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange. Directors, executive officers and 10% or more holders are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely on a review

of the copies of those forms furnished to us, or written representations that no forms were required, we believe that our directors, executive officers and 10% or more beneficial owners complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements during the year ended December 31, 2011, with the exception of Ms. Hinrichs, who filed one late Form 4 reporting one open market sale transaction.

2013.

STOCKHOLDERS’ PROPOSALSStockholders’ Proposals

Any stockholder who wishes to have a qualified proposal considered for inclusion in our proxy statement for our 20132015 Annual Meeting must send notice of the proposal to our Corporate Secretary at

our principal executive office no later than November 30, 2012.24, 2014. If you make such a proposal, you must provide your name, address, the number of shares of common stock you hold of record or beneficially, the date or dates on which such common stock was acquired and documentary support for any claim of beneficial ownership.

In addition, any stockholder who intends to submit a proposal for consideration at our 20132015 Annual Meeting, but not for inclusion in our proxy materials, or who intends to submit nominees for election as directors at the meeting must notify our Corporate Secretary. Under our By-Laws, such notice must (1) be received at our executive offices no earlier than November 11, 20127, 2014 or later than January 10, 2013,6, 2015, and (2) satisfy specified requirements. A copy of the pertinent By-Law provisions can be found on our Web site atwww.mcdermott.comat “About Us — Leadership & Corporate Governance — Corporate Governance.”

By Order of the Board of Directors,

LOGO

LIANE K. HINRICHS

Secretary

Dated: March 30, 201224, 2014

Appendix A

2014 MCDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.

LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

ARTICLE 1

Establishment, Objectives and Duration

1.1 Establishment of the Plan. McDermott International, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the Republic of Panama (hereinafter referred to as the “Company”), hereby establishes an incentive compensation plan to be known as the 2014 McDermott International, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan (hereinafter referred to as this “Plan”), as set forth in this document. This Plan permits the grant of Nonqualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Performance Shares and Performance Units (each as hereinafter defined). Subject to approval by the Company’s stockholders, this Plan shall become effective as of May 6, 2014 (the “Effective Date”) and shall remain in effect as provided in Section 1.3 hereof.

1.2 Objectives. This Plan is designed to promote the success and enhance the value of the Company by linking the personal interests of Participants (as hereinafter defined) to those of the Company’s stockholders, and by providing Participants with an incentive for outstanding performance. This Plan is further intended to provide flexibility to the Company in its ability to motivate, attract and retain the employment and/or services of Participants.

1.3 Duration. This Plan, as amended and restated, shall commence on the Effective Date, as described in Section 1.1 hereof, and shall remain in effect, subject to the right of the Board of Directors (as hereinafter defined) to amend or terminate this Plan at any time pursuant to Article 15 hereof, until all Shares (as hereinafter defined) subject to it shall have been purchased or acquired according to this Plan’s provisions; provided, however, that in no event may an Award (as hereinafter defined) be granted under this Plan on or after May 6, 2024.

ARTICLE 2

Definitions

As used in this Plan, the following terms shall have the respective meanings set forth below:

2.1 “Award” means a grant under this Plan of any Nonqualified Stock Option, Incentive Stock Option, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Unit, Performance Share or Performance Unit.

2.2 “Award Agreement” means an agreement entered into by the Company and a Participant, setting forth the terms and provisions applicable to an Award granted under this Plan.

2.3 “Award Limitations” has the meaning ascribed to such term in Section 4.2.

2.4 “Beneficial Owner” or “Beneficial Ownership” shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Rule 13d-3 of the General Rules and Regulations under the Exchange Act.

2.5 “Board”or “Board of Directors” means the Board of Directors of the Company.

2.6 “Change in Control” means the occurrence or existence of any of the following facts or circumstances after the Effective Date:

(a) any person (other than a trustee or other fiduciary holding securities under an employee benefit plan of the Company or a corporation or other entity owned, directly or indirectly, by the stockholders of the Company in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of stock of the Company) is or becomes the Beneficial Owner, directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing thirty percent (30%) or more of the combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding voting securities;

(b) within any period of two (2) consecutive years (not including any period prior to the Effective Date), individuals who at the beginning of such period constitute the Board, and any new Directors (other than a Director designated by a Person who has entered into an agreement with the Company to effect any transaction described in Clause (a), (c), (d) or (e) of this Section 2.6) whose election by the Board or nomination for election by the stockholders of the Company, was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds (2/3) of the Directors, then still in office who either were Directors at the beginning of the period or whose election or nomination for election was previously so approved, cease for any reason to constitute a majority of the Board;

(c) a merger or consolidation of the Company, with any other corporation or other entity has been consummated, other than a merger or consolidation which results in the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity) at least fifty percent (50%) of the combined voting power of the voting securities of the Company or the surviving entity outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation;

(d) the stockholders of the Company approve a plan of complete liquidation of the Company;

(e) the consummation of a sale or disposition by the Company of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets other than to an entity that is under common control with the Company or to an entity for which at least fifty percent (50%) of the combined voting power of its voting securities outstanding immediately after such sale or disposition are owned or controlled by the stockholders of the Company immediately prior to such sale or disposition; or

(f) within one year following the consummation of a merger or consolidation transaction involving the Company (whether as a constituent corporation, the acquiror, the direct or indirect parent entity of the acquiror, the entity being acquired, or the direct or indirect parent entity of the entity being acquired): (i) individuals who, at the time of the execution and delivery of the definitive agreement pursuant to which such transaction has been consummated by the parties thereto (a “Definitive Transaction Agreement”) (or, if there are multiple such agreements relating to such transaction, the first time of execution and delivery by the parties to any such agreement) (the “Execution Time”), constituted the Board cease, for any reason (excluding death, disability or voluntary resignation but including any such voluntary resignation effected in accordance with any Definitive Transaction Agreement), to constitute a majority of the Board; or (ii) the individual who, at the Execution Time, served as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company does not, for any reason (excluding as a result of death, disability or voluntary termination but including any such voluntary termination effected in accordance with any Definitive Transaction Agreement), serve as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company or, if the Company does not continue as a registrant with a class of equity securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act, as the Chief Executive Officer of a corporation or other entity that is (A) a registrant with a class of equity securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act and (B) the surviving entity in such transaction or a direct or indirect parent entity of the surviving entity or the Company following the consummation of such transaction; provided, however, that a Change in Control shall not be deemed to have occurred pursuant to this clause (f) in the case of a merger or consolidation which results in the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior

thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity) at least 55% of the combined voting power of the voting securities of the Company or the surviving entity outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation.

However, in no event shall a “Change in Control” be deemed to have occurred with respect to a Participant if the Participant is part of the purchasing group which consummates a transaction resulting in a Change-in-Control. A Participant shall be deemed “part of a purchasing group” for purposes of the preceding sentence if the Participant is an equity participant in the purchasing company or group (except for: (i) passive ownership of less than three percent (3%) of the stock of the purchasing company; or (ii) ownership of equity participation in the purchasing company or group which is otherwise not significant, as determined prior to the Change in Control by a majority of the non-employee continuing Directors).

2.7 “Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time.

2.8 “Committee” means the Compensation Committee of the Board, or such other committee of the Board appointed by the Board to administer this Plan (or the entire Board if so designated by the Board by written resolution), as specified in Article 3 hereof.

2.9 “Company” means McDermott International, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the Republic of Panama, and, except where the context otherwise indicates, shall include the Company’s Subsidiaries and, except with respect to the definition of “Change in Control” set forth above and the application of any defined terms used in such definition, any successor to any of such entities as provided in Article 18 hereof.

2.10 “Consultant” means a natural person who is neither an Employee nor a Director and who performs services for the Company or a Subsidiary pursuant to a contract, provided that those services are not in connection with the offer or sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction and do not directly or indirectly promote or maintain a market for the Company’s securities.

2.11 “Director” means any individual who is a member of the Board of Directors;provided, however, that any member of the Board of Directors who is employed by the Company shall be considered an Employee with respect to Awards made under this Plan.

2.12 “Disability” in the case of an Employee, shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in the Participant’s governing long-term disability plan and, in the case of a Director or Consultant, shall mean a permanent and total disability within the meaning of Section 22 (e)(3) of the Code, as determined by the Committee in good faith, upon receipt of medical advice that the Committee deems sufficient and competent, from one or more individuals selected by the Committee who are qualified to provide professional medical advice.

2.13 “Effective Date” shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Section 1.1 hereof.

2.14 “Employee” means any person who is employed by the Company.

2.15 “Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended from time to time.

2.16 “ERISA” means the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended from time to time.

2.17 “Fair Market Value” of a Share shall mean, as of a particular date, (a) if Shares are listed on a national securities exchange, the closing sales price per Share on the consolidated transaction

reporting system for the principal national securities exchange on which Shares are listed on that date, or, if no such sale is so reported on that date, on the last preceding date on which such a sale was so reported, (b) if no Shares are so listed but are traded on an over-the-counter market, the mean between the closing bid and asked prices for Shares on that date, or, if there are no such quotations available for that date, on the last preceding date for which such quotations are available, as reported by the OTC Markets Group Inc. (or any similar organization or agency succeeding to its function of reporting prices), or (c) if no Shares are publicly traded, the most recent value determined by an independent appraiser appointed by the Company for that purpose.

2.18 “Fiscal Year” means the year commencing January 1 and ending December 31.

2.19 “Incentive Stock Option” or “ISO” means an Option to purchase Shares granted under Article 6 hereof and which is designated as an Incentive Stock Option and is intended to meet the requirements of Code Section 422, or any successor provision.

2.20 “Named Executive Officer” means a Participant who, as of the date of vesting and/or payout of an award is one of the group of “covered employees” as defined in Section 162(m) of the Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder.

2.21 “Nonqualified Stock Option”or “NQSO” means an option to purchase Shares granted under Article 6 hereof and which is not an Incentive Stock Option.

2.22 “Officer” means an Employee of the Company included in the definition of “Officer” under Section 16 of the Exchange Act and rules and regulations promulgated thereunder or such other Employees who are designated as “Officers” by the Board.

2.23 “Option” means an Incentive Stock Option or a Nonqualified Stock Option.

2.24 “Option Price” means the price at which a Share may be purchased by a Participant pursuant to an Option, as determined by the Committee.

2.25 “Participant” means an eligible Officer, Director, Consultant or Employee who has been selected for participation in this Plan in accordance with Section 5.2.

2.26 “Performance-Based Award” means an Award that is designed to qualify for the Performance-Based Exception.

2.27 “Performance-Based Exception” means the performance-based exception from the deductibility limitations of Code Section 162(m).

2.28 “Performance Period” means, with respect to aPerformance-Based Award, the period of time during which the performance goals specified in such Award must be met in order to determine the degree of payout and/or vesting with respect to thatPerformance-Based Award.

2.29 “Performance Share” means an Award designated as such and granted to an Employee, as described in Article 8 hereof.

2.30 “Performance Unit” means an Award designated as such and granted to an Employee, as described in Article 8 herein.

2.31 “Person” shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Section 3(a)(9) of the Exchange Act and used in Section 13(d) and 14(d) thereof, including a “group” (as that term is used in Section 13(d)(3) thereof).

2.32 “Prior Plan” means the 2009 McDermott International, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan.

2.33 “Restricted Stock” means an Award designated as such and granted to a Participant pursuant to Article 7 hereof.

2.34 “Restricted Stock Unit”or “RSU” means a contractual promise to distribute to a Participant one Share or cash equal to the Fair Market Value of one Share, determined in the sole discretion of the Committee, which shall be delivered to the Participant upon satisfaction of the vesting and any other requirements set forth in the related Award Agreement.

2.35 “Shares” means the common stock, par value $1.00 per share, of the Company.

2.36 “Subsidiary” means any corporation, partnership, joint venture, affiliate or other entity in which the Company has a majority voting interest.

2.37 “Vesting Period” means the period during which an Award granted hereunder is subject to a service or performance-related restriction, as set forth in the related Award Agreement.

ARTICLE 3

Administration

3.1 The Committee. This Plan shall be administered by the Committee. The members of the Committee shall be appointed from time to time by, and shall serve at the discretion of, the Board of Directors.

3.2 Authority of the Committee. Except as limited by law or by the Articles of Incorporation or Amended and RestatedBy-Laws of the Company (each as amended from time to time), the Committee shall have full and exclusive power and authority to take all actions specifically contemplated by this Plan or that are necessary or appropriate in connection with the administration hereof and shall also have full and exclusive power and authority to interpret this Plan and to adopt such rules, regulations and guidelines for carrying out this Plan as the Committee may deem necessary or proper. The Committee shall have full power and sole discretion to: select Officers, Directors, Consultants and Employees who shall be granted Awards under this Plan; determine the sizes and types of Awards; determine the time when Awards are to be granted and any conditions that must be satisfied before an Award is granted; determine the terms and conditions of Awards in a manner consistent with this Plan; determine whether the conditions for earning an Award have been met and whether a Performance-Based Award will be paid at the end of an applicable performance period; determine the guidelines and/or procedures for the payment or exercise of Awards; and determine whether a Performance-Based Award should qualify, regardless of its amount, as deductible in its entirety for federal income tax purposes, including whether a Performance-Based Award granted to an Officer should qualify as performance-based compensation. The Committee may, in its sole discretion, accelerate the vesting or exercisability of an Award, eliminate or make less restrictive any restrictions contained in an Award, waive any restriction or other provision of this Plan or any Award or otherwise amend or modify any Award in any manner that is either (a) not adverse to the Participant to whom such Award was granted or (b) consented to in writing by such Participant, and (c) consistent with the requirements of Code Section 409A, if applicable. Notwithstanding the foregoing, subject to the provisions of Section 4.3 hereof, the terms of outstanding Awards may not be amended without the approval of the Company’s stockholders so as to (i) reduce the Option Price of any outstanding Option or (ii) cancel any outstanding Option in exchange for cash or other Awards (including substitutions and cash buyouts) or for an Option with an Option Price that is less than the Option Price of the original

Option. The Committee may correct any defect or supply any omission or reconcile any inconsistency in this Plan or in any Award in the manner and to the extent the Committee deems necessary or desirable to further this Plan’s objectives. Further, the Committee shall make all other determinations that may be necessary or advisable for the administration of this Plan. As permitted by law and the terms of this Plan, the Committee may delegate its authority as identified herein.

3.3 Delegation of Authority. To the extent permitted under applicable law, the Board or Committee may delegate to any committee of the Board (including, for the avoidance of doubt, a single-person committee), to the Chief Executive Officer and to other senior officers of the Company its duties under this Plan pursuant to such conditions or limitations as the Committee may establish; provided however, the Committee may not delegate any authority to grant Awards to a Director.

3.4 Decisions Binding. All determinations and decisions made by the Committee pursuant to the provisions of this Plan and all related orders and resolutions of the Committee shall be final, conclusive and binding on all persons concerned, including the Company, its stockholders, Officers, Directors, Employees, Consultants, Participants and their estates and beneficiaries.

ARTICLE 4

Shares Subject to this Plan

4.1 Number of Shares Available for Grants of Awards. Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4.3 hereof, there is reserved for issuance of Awards under this Plan 6,600,000 Shares (the “Maximum Share Limitation”) all of which shall be available for Incentive Stock Options, as well as any other form of Award. Each Award settled in Shares other than an Option shall be counted against the Maximum Share Limitation as 1.69 Shares; each Option shall be counted against the Maximum Share Limitation as one Share. If an Award under this Plan or the Prior Plan expires or is terminated, cancelled or forfeited, the Shares associated with the expired, terminated, cancelled or forfeited Award shall again be available for Awards under the Plan, and the Maximum Share Limitation shall be increased by the same amount as such Shares were counted against the Maximum Share Limitation (or with respect to Awards granted under the Prior Plan, as one Share per Share subject to the Award). Shares approved pursuant to the Prior Plan which have not been awarded as of the Effective Date will immediately become available for Awards. Upon shareholder approval, no additional grants will be made pursuant to the Prior Plan. Shares that are tendered by a Participant or withheld as full or partial payment of minimum withholding taxes related to the vesting or settlement of an Award other than Options shall become available again for Awards under the Plan. The following Shares shall not become available again for Awards under the Plan:

(i) Shares that are tendered by a Participant or withheld (1) as full or partial payment of minimum withholding taxes related to the exercise or settlement of Options, or (2) as payment for the Option Price of an Option; and

(ii) Shares repurchased in the open market with the proceeds of the payment of the Option Price of an Option.

The foregoing notwithstanding, subject to applicable stock exchange listing requirements, the Maximum Share Limitation shall not be reduced by (x) Shares issued under Awards granted in assumption, substitution or exchange for previously granted awards of a company acquired by the Company or, to the extent allowed under applicable law and stock exchange requirements, otherwise a party to a transaction with the Company resulting in an adjustment of shares pursuant to Section 4.3 and (y) available shares under a stockholder approved plan of an acquired company (as appropriately adjusted to reflect the transaction) and such shares shall be available for Awards under the Plan. The

Committee may from time to time adopt and observe such procedures concerning the counting of Shares against this Plan maximum as it may deem appropriate.

4.2 Limits on Grants in Any Fiscal Year. The following rules (“Award Limitations”) shall apply to grants of Awards under this Plan:

(a)Options. The maximum aggregate number of Shares issuable pursuant to Awards of Options that may be granted in any one Fiscal Year of the Company to any one Participant shall be one million five hundred thousand (1,500,000).

(b)Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units.The maximum aggregate number of Shares subject to Awards of Restricted Stock and RSUs that may be granted in any one Fiscal Year to any one Participant shall be one million five hundred thousand (1,500,000).

(c)Performance Shares. The maximum aggregate number of Shares subject to Awards of Performance Shares that may be granted in any one Fiscal Year to any one Participant shall be one million five hundred thousand (1,500,000).

(d)Performance Units. The maximum aggregate cash payout with respect to Performance Units granted in any one Fiscal Year to any one Participant shall be six million dollars ($6,000,000), with such cash value determined as of the date of each grant.

(e)Director Awards. The aggregate grant date fair value of Awards to any individual Director in any calendar year shall not exceed five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000).

4.3 Adjustments in Authorized Shares. The existence of outstanding Awards shall not affect in any manner the right or power of the Company or its stockholders to make or authorize any or all adjustments, recapitalizations, reorganizations or other changes in the capital stock of the Company or its business or any merger or consolidation of the Company, or any issue of bonds, debentures, preferred or prior preference stock (whether or not such issue is prior to, on a parity with or junior to the Shares) or the dissolution or liquidation of the Company, or any sale or transfer of all or any part of its assets or business or any other corporate act or proceeding of any kind, whether or not of a character similar to that of the acts or proceedings enumerated above.

If there shall be any change in the Shares of the Company or the capitalization of the Company through merger, consolidation, reorganization, recapitalization, stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split, split-up, spin-off, combination of shares, exchange of shares, dividend in kind or other like change in capital structure or distribution (other than normal cash dividends) to stockholders of the Company, the Committee, in its sole discretion, in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of Participants’ rights under this Plan, shall adjust, in such manner as it deems equitable, as applicable, the number and kind of Shares that may be granted as Awards under this Plan, the number and kind of Shares subject to outstanding Awards, the exercise or other price applicable to outstanding Awards, the Awards Limitations, the Fair Market Value of the Shares and other value determinations applicable to outstanding Awards;provided, however, that the number of Shares subject to any Award shall always be a whole number. In the event of a corporate merger, consolidation, acquisition of property or stock, separation, reorganization or liquidation, the Committee shall be authorized, in its sole discretion, to: (a) grant or assume Awards by means of substitution of new Awards, as appropriate, for previously granted Awards or to assume previously granted Awards as part of such adjustment; (b) make provision, prior to the transaction, for the acceleration of the vesting and exercisability of, or lapse of restrictions with respect to, Awards and the termination of Options that remain unexercised at the time of such transaction; (c) provide for the acceleration of the vesting and exercisability of Options and the cancellation thereof in exchange for such payment as the Committee, in its sole discretion, determines is a reasonable approximation of the value thereof; (d) cancel any Awards and direct the Company to deliver to the Participants who are the holders of such Awards cash in an amount that the Committee shall determine in its sole discretion is equal to the fair market value of such Awards as of

the date of such event, which, in the case of any Option, shall be the amount equal to the excess of the Fair Market Value of a Share as of such date over the per-share Option Price for such Option (for the avoidance of doubt, if such Option Price is less than such Fair Market Value, the Option may be canceled for no consideration); or (e) cancel Awards that are Options and give the Participants who are the holders of such Awards notice and opportunity to exercise prior to such cancellation.

ARTICLE 5

Eligibility and Participation

5.1 Eligibility. Persons eligible to participate in this Plan include all Officers, Directors, Employees and Consultants, as determined in the sole discretion of the Committee.

5.2 Actual Participation. Subject to the provisions of this Plan, the Committee may, from time to time, select from all Officers, Directors, Employees and Consultants, those to whom Awards shall be granted and shall determine the nature and amount of each Award. No Officer, Director, Employee or Consultant shall have the right to be selected for Participation in this Plan, or, having been so selected, to be selected to receive a future award.

ARTICLE 6

Options

6.1 Grant of Options. Subject to the terms and provisions of this Plan, Options may be granted to Participants in such number, upon such terms, at any time, and from time to time, as shall be determined by the Committee;provided, however,that ISOs may be awarded only to Employees. Subject to the terms of this Plan, the Committee shall have discretion in determining the number of Shares subject to Options granted to each Participant.

6.2 Option Award Agreement.Each Option grant shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement that shall specify the Option Price, the duration of the Option, the number of Shares to which the Option pertains, and such other provisions as the Committee shall determine that are not inconsistent with the terms of this Plan. The Award Agreement also shall specify whether the Option is intended to be an ISO or an NQSO (provided that, in the absence of such specification, the Option shall be an NQSO).

6.3 Option Price. The Option Price for each grant of an Option under this Plan shall be as determined by the Committee;provided, however, that, subject to any subsequent adjustment that may be made pursuant to the provisions of Section 4.3 hereof, the Option Price shall be not less than one hundred percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date the Option is granted. Except as otherwise provided in Section 4.3 hereof, without prior stockholder approval no repricing of Options awarded under this Plan shall be permitted such that the terms of outstanding Options may not be amended to reduce the Option Price and further Options may not be replaced or regranted through cancellation, in exchange for cash, other Awards, or if the effect of the replacement or regrant would be to reduce the Option Price of the Options or would constitute a repricing under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (as applicable to the Company’s public reporting). No Option may contain a right to dividend equivalents.

6.4 Duration of Options. Subject to any earlier expiration that may be effected pursuant to the provisions of Section 4.3 hereof, each Option shall expire at such time as the Committee shall determine at the time of grant;provided, however, that an Option shall not be exercisable later than the

seventh (7th) anniversary date of its grant; provided, however, if the term of an Option (but not an ISO) expires when trading in the Shares is prohibited by applicable law or the Company’s insider trading policy (as then in effect), then the term of such Option shall expire on the 30th day after the expiration of such prohibition.

6.5 Exercise of Options. Options granted under this Plan shall be exercisable at such times and be subject to such restrictions and conditions as the Committee shall in each instance approve, which need not be the same for each grant or for each Participant.

6.6 Payment. Any Option granted under this Article 6 shall be exercised by the delivery of a notice of exercise to the Company or its outside administrator in the manner prescribed by the Committee from time to time in the related Award Agreement, setting forth the number of Shares with respect to which the Option is to be exercised, and either (i) accompanied by full payment of the Option Price for the Shares issuable on such exercise or (ii) exercised in a manner that is in accordance with applicable law and the “cashless exercise” procedures (if any) approved by the Committee involving a broker or dealer.

The Option Price upon exercise of any Option shall be payable to the Company in full: (a) in cash; (b) by tendering previously acquired Shares valued at their Fair Market Value per Share at the time of exercise; (c) by a combination of (a) and (b); or (d) any other method approved by the Committee, in its sole discretion.

Subject to any governing rules or regulations, as soon as practicable after receipt of a notification of exercise and full payment, the Company shall deliver to the Participant, in the Participant’s name, Share certificates in an appropriate amount based upon the number of Shares purchased under the Option, or shall cause Shares to be issued or transferred to the Participant via book-entry registration.

6.7 Restrictions on Share Transferability. The Committee may impose such restrictions on any Shares acquired pursuant to the exercise of an Option granted under this Plan as it may deem advisable, including, without limitation, restrictions under applicable U.S. federal securities laws, under the requirements of any stock exchange or market upon which such Shares are then listed and/or traded, and under any blue sky or state securities laws applicable to such Shares.

6.8 Termination of Employment, Service or Directorship. Each Option Award Agreement shall set forth the extent to which the Participant shall have the right to exercise the Option following termination of the Participant’s employment, service or directorship with the Company and/or its Subsidiaries. Such provisions shall be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee, shall be included in each Award Agreement entered into with a Participant with respect to an Option Award, need not be uniform among all Options granted pursuant to this Article 6 and may reflect distinctions based on the reasons for termination.

6.9 Transferability of Options.

(a)Incentive Stock Options.No ISO granted under this Plan may be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned or otherwise alienated or hypothecated, other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution or pursuant to a qualified domestic relations order as defined by the Code or Title I of ERISA, or the regulations thereunder. Further, all ISOs granted to a Participant under this Plan shall be exercisable during his or her lifetime only by such Participant.

(b)Nonqualified Stock Options. Except as otherwise provided in a Participant’s Award Agreement, NQSOs granted under this Plan may not be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned or otherwise alienated or hypothecated, other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution

or pursuant to a qualified domestic relations order as defined by the Code or Title I of ERISA, or the regulations thereunder. Further, except as otherwise provided in a Participant’s Award Agreement, all NQSOs granted to a Participant under this Plan shall be exercisable during his or her lifetime only by such Participant.

ARTICLE 7

Restricted Stock

7.1 Grant of Restricted Stock. Subject to the terms and provisions of this Plan, the Committee at any time, and from time to time, may grant Shares as Restricted Stock (“Shares of Restricted Stock”) to Participants in such amounts as the Committee shall determine.

7.2 Restricted Stock Award Agreement. Each Award of Restricted Stock shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement that shall specify the Vesting Period, the number of Shares of Restricted Stock granted, and such other provisions as the Committee shall determine.

7.3 Transferability. Except as provided in the Participant’s related Award Agreement and/or this Article 7, the Shares of Restricted Stock granted to a Participant under this Plan may not be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned or otherwise alienated or hypothecated until the end of the applicable Vesting Period established by the Committee and specified in the related Award Agreement entered into with that Participant, or upon earlier satisfaction of any other conditions, as specified by the Committee in its sole discretion and set forth in the Award Agreement. During the applicable Vesting Period, all rights with respect to the Restricted Stock granted to a Participant under this Plan shall be available during his or her lifetime only to such Participant. Any attempted assignment of Restricted Stock in violation of this Section 7.3 shall be null and void.

7.4 Other Restrictions. The Committee may impose such other conditions and/or restrictions on any Shares of Restricted Stock granted pursuant to this Plan as it may deem advisable, including, without limitation, a requirement that Participants pay a stipulated purchase price for each Share of Restricted Stock, restrictions based upon the achievement of specific performance goals, time-based restrictions on vesting following the attainment of the performance goals and/or restrictions under applicable U.S. federal or state securities laws.

To the extent deemed appropriate by the Committee, the Company may retain any certificates representing Shares of Restricted Stock in the Company’s possession until such time as all conditions and/or restrictions applicable to such Shares have been satisfied or have lapsed.

7.5 Removal of Restrictions. Except as otherwise provided in this Article 7, Shares of Restricted Stock covered by each Restricted Stock Award made under this Plan shall become freely transferable by the Participant after all conditions and restrictions applicable to such Shares have been satisfied or have lapsed.

7.6 Voting Rights. To the extent permitted by the Committee or required by applicable law, Participants holding Shares of Restricted Stock granted hereunder may exercise full voting rights with respect to those Shares during the applicable Vesting Period.

7.7 Dividends. During the applicable Vesting Period, Participants holding Shares of Restricted Stock granted hereunder shall, unless the Committee otherwise determines, be credited with cash dividends paid with respect to the Shares, in a manner determined by the Committee in its sole discretion. The Committee may apply any restrictions to the dividends that it deems appropriate.

7.8 Termination of Employment, Service or Directorship. Each Restricted Stock Award Agreement shall set forth the extent to which the Participant shall have the right to receive unvested Shares of Restricted Stock following termination of the Participant’s employment, service or directorship with the Company and/or its Subsidiaries. Such provisions shall be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee, shall be included in each Award Agreement entered into with a Participant with respect to Shares of Restricted Stock, need not be uniform among all Shares of Restricted Stock granted pursuant to this Article 7 and may reflect distinctions based on the reasons for termination.

ARTICLE 8

Performance Units and Performance Shares

8.1 Grant of Performance Units/Shares. Subject to the terms of this Plan, Performance Units and Performance Shares may be granted to Participants in such amounts and upon such terms, and at any time and from time to time, as shall be determined by the Committee.

8.2 Value of Performance Units/Shares. Each Performance Unit shall have an initial value that is established by the Committee at the time of grant. Each Performance Share shall represent the right to receive a Share subject to the satisfaction of relevant performance conditions. The Committee shall set performance goals in its discretion that, depending on the extent to which they are met, will determine the number and/or value of Performance Units/Shares which will be paid out to the Participant.

8.3 Earning of Performance Units/Shares. Subject to the terms of this Plan, after the applicable Performance Period has ended, the holder of Performance Units/Shares shall be entitled to receive payment of the number and value of Performance Units/Shares earned by the Participant over the Performance Period, to be determined as a function of the extent to which the corresponding performance goals have been achieved.

8.4 Form and Timing of Payment of Performance Units/Shares. Subject to the provisions of Article 12 hereof, Payment of earned Performance Units/Shares to a Participant shall be made no later than March 15 following the end of the calendar year in which such Performance Units/Shares vest, or as soon as administratively practicable thereafter if payment is delayed due to unforeseeable events. Subject to the terms of this Plan, the Committee, in its sole discretion, may pay earned Performance Units/Shares in the form of cash or in Shares (or in a combination thereof) that have an aggregate Fair Market Value equal to the value of the earned Performance Units/Shares at the close of the applicable Performance Period. Any Shares issued or transferred to a Participant for this purpose may be granted subject to any restrictions that are deemed appropriate by the Committee.

8.5 Voting Rights and Dividends. During the applicable Vesting Period, Participants holding Performance Shares shall not have voting rights with respect to the Shares underlying such Performance Shares. For the avoidance of doubt, a Performance Share shall not convey any rights as a stockholder until Shares are issued and delivered to the Participant. During the applicable Vesting Period, Participants holding Performance Shares granted hereunder may be credited with dividend equivalents, in the form of cash or additional Performance Shares (as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion), if a cash dividend is paid with respect to the Shares. The extent to which dividend equivalents shall be credited shall be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee. Such dividend equivalents shall be subject to the same vesting restrictions and performance restrictions as the Performance Shares with respect to which the dividend equivalents are paid.

8.6 Termination of Employment, Service or Directorship. Each Award Agreement providing for a Performance Unit/Share shall set forth the extent to which the Participant shall have the right to receive a payout of cash or Shares with respect to unvested Performance Unit/Shares following

termination of the Participant’s employment, service or directorship with the Company and/or its Subsidiaries. Such provisions shall be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee, shall be included in the Award Agreement entered into with the Participant, need not be uniform among all Awards of Performance Units/Shares granted pursuant to this Article 8 and may reflect distinctions based on the reasons for termination.

8.7 Transferability. Except as otherwise provided in a Participant’s related Award Agreement, Performance Units/Shares may not be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned or otherwise alienated or hypothecated, other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution or pursuant to a qualified domestic relations order as defined by the Code or Title I of ERISA, or the regulations thereunder. Further, except as otherwise provided in a Participant’s related Award Agreement, a Participant’s rights with respect to Performance Units/Shares granted to that Participant under this Plan shall be exercisable during the Participant’s lifetime only by the Participant. Any attempted assignment of Performance Units/Shares in violation of this Section 8.6 shall be null and void.

ARTICLE 9

Restricted Stock Units

9.1 Grant of RSUs. Subject to the terms and provisions of this Plan, the Committee at any time, and from time to time, may grant RSUs to eligible Participants in such amounts as the Committee shall determine.

9.2 RSU Award Agreement. Each RSU Award to a Participant shall be evidenced by an RSU Award Agreement entered into with that Participant, which shall specify the Vesting Period, the number of RSUs granted, and such other provisions as the Committee shall determine in its sole discretion.

9.3 Transferability. Except as provided in a Participant’s related Award Agreement, RSUs granted hereunder may not be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned or otherwise alienated or hypothecated, other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution or pursuant to a qualified domestic relations order as defined by the Code or Title I of ERISA, or the regulations thereunder. Further, except as otherwise provided in a Participant’s related Award Agreement, a Participant’s rights with respect to an RSU Award granted to that Participant under this Plan shall be available during his or her lifetime only to such Participant. Any attempted assignment of an RSU Award in violation of this Section 9.3 shall be null and void.

9.4 Form and Timing of Delivery. If a Participant’s RSU Award Agreement provides for payment in cash, payment equal to the Fair Market Value of the Shares underlying the RSU Award, calculated as of the last day of the applicable Vesting Period, shall be made in a singlelump-sum payment. If a Participant’s RSU Award Agreement provides for payment in Shares, the Shares underlying the RSU Award shall be delivered to the Participant. Such payment of cash or Shares shall be made no later than March 15 following the end of the calendar year during which the RSU Award vests, or as soon as practicable thereafter if payment is delayed due to unforeseeable events. Such delivered Shares shall be freely transferable by the Participant.

9.5 Voting Rights and Dividends. During the applicable Vesting Period, Participants holding RSUs shall not have voting rights with respect to the Shares underlying such RSUs. For the avoidance of doubt, an RSU shall not convey any rights as a stockholder until Shares are issued and delivered to the Participant. During the applicable Vesting Period, Participants holding RSUs granted hereunder shall, unless the Committee otherwise determines, be credited with dividend equivalents, in the form of cash or additional RSUs (as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion), if a cash dividend is

paid with respect to the Shares. The extent to which dividend equivalents shall be credited shall be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee. Such dividend equivalents shall be subject to a Vesting Period equal to the remaining Vesting Period of the RSUs with respect to which the dividend equivalents are paid.

9.6 Termination of Employment, Service or Directorship. Each RSU Award Agreement shall set forth the extent to which the applicable Participant shall have the right to receive a payout of cash or Shares with respect to unvested RSUs following termination of the Participant’s employment, service or directorship with the Company and/or its Subsidiaries. Such provisions shall be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee, shall be included in each Award Agreement entered into with a Participant with respect to RSUs, need not be uniform among all RSUs granted pursuant to this Article 9 and may reflect distinctions based on the reasons for termination.

ARTICLE 10

Performance Measures

10.1 Performance Measures.Unless and until the Committee proposes and stockholders approve a change in the general performance measures set forth in this Article 10, the attainment of which may determine the degree of payout and/or vesting with respect to Awards to Named Executive Officers which are designed to qualify for the Performance-Based Exception, the performance measure(s) to be used for purposes of such grants shall be chosen from among the following alternatives:

revenue and income measures (which include revenue, gross margin, income from operations, net income, net sales and earnings per share);

expense measures (which include costs of goods sold, sales, general and administrative expenses and overhead costs);

operating measures (which include bookings, volume, margin, breakage and shrinkage, productivity and market share);

cash flow measures (which include net cash flow from operating activities and working capital);

liquidity measures (which include earnings before or after the effect of certain items such as interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, cash flow and free cash flow);

leverage measures (which include equity ratio and net debt);

market measures (including those relating to market price, stock price, total shareholder return and market capitalization measures);

return measures (which include return on equity, return on assets, cash flow return on assets, cash flow return on capital, cash flow return on equity, return on capital and return on invested capital);

corporate value measures (which include compliance, safety, environmental and personnel matters); and

measures relating to acquisitions, dispositions or customer satisfaction.

Subject to the terms of this Plan, each of these measures shall be defined by the Committee on a consolidated, group or division basis, on an absolute or relative basis or in comparison to one or more peer group companies or indices, and may include or exclude specified extraordinary items as defined by the Company’s auditors.

10.2 Adjustments.The Committee shall have the sole discretion to adjust determinations of the degree of attainment of the pre-established performance goals; provided, however, that Awards which are designed to qualify for the Performance-Based Exception and which are held by Named Executive Officers may not be adjusted upwards on a discretionary basis. The Committee shall retain the discretion to adjust such Awards downward.

10.3 Compliance with Code Section 162(m). In the event that applicable tax and/or securities laws or regulations change to permit Committee discretion to alter the governing performance measures without obtaining stockholder approval of such changes, the Committee shall have sole discretion to make such changes without obtaining stockholder approval. In addition, in the event that the Committee determines that it is advisable to grant Awards to Named Executive Officers which shall not qualify for the Performance-Based Exception, the Committee may make such grants without satisfying the requirements of Code Section 162(m) and the regulations issued thereunder. Any performance-based Awards granted to Officers or Directors that are not intended to qualify as qualified performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code shall be based on achievement of such performance measure(s) and be subject to such terms, conditions and restrictions as the Committee shall determine.

ARTICLE 11

Transferability; Benefits on Death

Awards under this Plan are not transferable (either voluntarily or involuntarily), before or after Participant’s death, except as follows: (a) during Participant’s lifetime, pursuant to a domestic relations order, issued by a court of competent jurisdiction, that is not contrary to the terms and conditions of this Plan or the applicable Award Agreement, and in a form acceptable to the Committee, in its sole discretion; or (b) after Participant’s death, by will or pursuant to the applicable laws of descent and distribution, as may be the case. Any person to whom an Award is transferred in accordance with the provisions of the preceding sentence shall take such Award subject to all of the terms and conditions of this Plan and the applicable Award Agreement, including that the vesting and termination provisions thereof will continue to be applied with respect to the Participant. Options are exercisable only by the Participant (or, during the Participant’s lifetime, by the Grantee’s court appointed legal representative) or a person to whom the Options have been transferred in accordance with this Article.

ARTICLE 12

Deferrals

The Committee may, in its sole discretion, permit selected Participants to elect to defer payment of some or all types of Awards, or may provide for the deferral of an Award in an Award Agreement; provided, however, that the timing of any such election and payment of any such deferral shall be specified in the Award Agreement and shall conform to the requirements of Code Section 409A(a)(2), (3) and (4) and the regulations and rulings issued thereunder. Any deferred payment, whether elected by a Participant or specified in an Award Agreement or by the Committee, may be forfeited if and to the extent that the applicable Award Agreement so provides.

ARTICLE 13

Rights of Employees, Directors and Consultants

13.1 Employment or Service. Nothing in this Plan shall interfere with or limit in any way the right of the Company to terminate any Participant’s employment or service at any time, nor confer upon any Participant any right to continue in the employ or service of the Company.

13.2 No Contract of Employment. Neither an Award nor any benefits arising under this Plan shall constitute part of a Participant’s employment contract with the Company or any Subsidiary, and accordingly, subject to the provisions of Article 15 hereof, this Plan and the benefits hereunder may be terminated at any time in the sole and exclusive discretion of the Board without giving rise to liability on the part of the Company or any Subsidiary for severance payments.

13.3 Transfers Between Participating Entities. For purposes of this Plan, a transfer of a Participant’s employment between the Company and a Subsidiary, or between Subsidiaries, shall not be deemed to be a termination of employment. Upon such a transfer, the Committee may make such adjustments to outstanding Awards as it deems appropriate to reflect the change in reporting relationships.

ARTICLE 14

Change in Control

The treatment of outstanding Awards upon the occurrence of a Change in Control, unless otherwise specifically prohibited under applicable laws, or by the rules and regulations of any governing governmental agencies or national securities exchanges shall be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee and shall be described in the Award Agreements and need not be uniform among all Awards granted pursuant to this Plan.

ARTICLE 15

Amendment, Modification and Termination

15.1 Amendment, Modification, and Termination. The Board may at any time and from time to time, alter, amend, suspend or terminate this Plan in whole or in part,provided, however, that stockholder approval shall be required for any amendment that materially alters the terms of this Plan or is otherwise required by applicable legal requirements. No amendment or alteration that would adversely affect the rights of any Participant under any Award previously granted to such Participant shall be made without the consent of such Participant.

15.2 Adjustment of Awards Upon the Occurrence of Certain Unusual or Nonrecurring Events. The Committee may make adjustments in the terms and conditions of, and the criteria included in, Awards in recognition of unusual or nonrecurring events (including, without limitation, the events described in Section 4.3 hereof) affecting the Company or the financial statements of the Company or in recognition of changes in applicable laws, regulations or accounting principles, whenever the Committee determines that such adjustments are appropriate in order to prevent unintended dilution or enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits intended to be made available under this Plan.

ARTICLE 16

Withholding

The Company shall have the right to deduct applicable taxes from any Award payment and withhold, at the time of delivery or vesting of cash or Shares under this Plan, or at the time applicable law otherwise requires, an appropriate amount of cash or number of Shares or a combination thereof for payment of taxes required by law or to take such other action as may be necessary in the opinion of

the Company to satisfy all obligations for withholding of such taxes. The Committee may permit withholding to be satisfied by the transfer to the Company of Shares theretofore owned by the holder of the Award with respect to which withholding is required. If Shares are used to satisfy tax withholding, such Shares shall be valued at their Fair Market Value on the date when the tax withholding is required to be made.

ARTICLE 17

Indemnification

Each person who is or shall have been a member of the Committee, or of the Board, or an officer of the Company to whom the Committee has delegated authority in accordance with Article 3 hereof, shall be indemnified and held harmless by the Company against and from: (a) any loss, cost, liability, or expense that may be imposed upon or reasonable incurred by him or her in connection with or resulting from any claim, action, suit or proceeding to which he or she may be a party or in which he or she may be involved by reason of any action taken or failure to act under this Plan, except for any such action or failure to act that constitutes willful misconduct on the part of such person or as to which any applicable statute prohibits the Company from providing indemnification; and (b) any and all amounts paid by him or her in settlement of any claim, action, suit or proceeding as to which indemnification is provided pursuant to clause (a) of this sentence, with the Company’s approval, or paid by him or her in satisfaction of any judgment or award in any such action, suit or proceeding against him or her, provided he or she shall give the Company an opportunity, at its own expense, to handle and defend the same before he or she undertakes to handle and defend it on his or her own behalf.

The foregoing right of indemnification shall be in addition to any other rights of indemnification to which such persons may be entitled under the Company’s Articles of Incorporation or Amended and RestatedBy-Laws (each, as amended from time to time), as a matter of law, or otherwise.

ARTICLE 18

Successors

All obligations of the Company under this Plan with respect to Awards granted hereunder shall be binding on any successor to the Company, whether the existence of such successor is the direct or indirect result of a merger, consolidation, purchase of all or substantially all of the business and/or assets of the Company or other transaction.

ARTICLE 19

General Provisions

19.1 Restrictions and Legends. No Shares or other form of payment shall be issued or transferred with respect to any Award unless the Company shall be satisfied that such issuance or transfer will be in compliance with applicable U.S. federal and state securities laws. The Committee may require each person receiving Shares pursuant to an Award under this Plan to represent to and agree with the Company in writing that the Participant is acquiring the Shares for investment without a view to distribution thereof. Any certificates evidencing Shares delivered under this Plan (to the extent that such Shares are so evidenced) may be subject to suchstop-transfer orders and other restrictions

as the Committee may deem advisable under the rules, regulations and other requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, any securities exchange or transaction reporting system upon which the Shares are then listed or to which they are admitted for quotation and any applicable U.S. federal or state securities law. In addition to any other legend required by this Plan, any certificates for such Shares may include any legend that the Committee deems appropriate to reflect any restrictions on transfer of such Shares.

19.2 Gender and Number. Except where otherwise indicated by the context, any masculine term used herein also shall include the feminine, the plural shall include the singular and the singular shall include the plural.

19.3 Severability. If any provision of this Plan shall be held illegal or invalid for any reason, the illegality or invalidity shall not affect the remaining parts of this Plan, and this Plan shall be construed and enforced as if the illegal or invalid provision had not been included.

19.4 Requirements of Law. The granting of Awards and the issuance of Shares under this Plan shall be subject to all applicable laws, rules and regulations, and to such approvals by any governmental agencies or national securities exchanges as may be required.

19.5 Uncertificated Shares. To the extent that this Plan provides for issuance of certificates to reflect the transfer of Shares, the transfer of such Shares may be effected on a noncertificated basis, to the extent not prohibited by applicable law or the rules of any stock exchange or transaction reporting system on which the Shares are listed or to which the Shares are admitted for quotation.

19.6 Clawback Policy. Notwithstanding any other provisions in this Plan, any Award shall be subject to recovery or clawback by the Company under any clawback policy adopted by the Company in accordance with applicable law, as amended or superseded from time to time.

19.7 Unfunded Plan. Insofar as this Plan provides for Awards of cash, Shares or rights thereto, it will be unfunded. Although the Company may establish bookkeeping accounts with respect to Participants who are entitled to cash, Shares or rights thereto under this Plan, it will use any such accounts merely as a bookkeeping convenience. Participants shall have no right, title or interest whatsoever in or to any investments that the Company may make to aid it in meeting its obligations under this Plan. Nothing contained in this Plan, and no action taken pursuant to its provisions, shall create or be construed to create a trust of any kind, or a fiduciary relationship between the Company and any Participant, beneficiary, legal representative or any other person. To the extent that any person acquires a right to receive payments from the Company under this Plan, such right shall be no greater than the right of an unsecured general creditor of the Company. All payments to be made hereunder shall be paid from the general funds of the Company and no special or separate fund shall be established and no segregation of assets shall be made to assure payment of such amounts, except as expressly set forth in this Plan. This Plan is not intended to be subject to ERISA.

19.8 No Fractional Shares. No fractional Shares shall be issued or delivered pursuant to this Plan or any Award. The Committee shall determine whether cash, Awards or other property shall be delivered or paid in lieu of fractional Shares or whether such fractional Shares or any rights thereto shall be forfeited or otherwise eliminated.

19.9 Governing Law. This Plan and all determinations made and actions taken pursuant hereto, to the extent not otherwise governed by mandatory provisions of the Code or the securities laws of the United States, will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas, without giving effect to any conflicts of laws provisions thereof that would result in the application of the laws of any other jurisdiction.

 

 

LOGO


LOGO

LOGO

MCDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.

757 N. ELDRIDGE PKWY

HOUSTON, TX 77079

 

VOTE BY INTERNET -www.proxyvote.com

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 p.m.P.M., Eastern Time, on May 9, 20125, 2014 (May 7, 20121, 2014 for participants in McDermott’s Thrift Plan). Have your proxy card in hand when you access the webWeb site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

 

VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m.P.M., Eastern Time, on May 9, 20125, 2014 (May 7, 20121, 2014 for participants in McDermott’s Thrift Plan). Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

 

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark,Using a blue or black ink pen, mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

 

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS

If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.

 

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:

M43299-P20059M69092-P47785                         KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS

 

DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

 

MCDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.

 

For
All

 

Withhold All

 

For All
Except

 

To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) for whom authority is withheld on the line below.

        

The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following:

          

1.

 

 

ElectionTo elect eight members to our Board of Directors, each for a term of one year.

 ¨ ¨ ¨ 

      
  

 

Nominees:

     

     
  

 

01)  John F. Bookout, III

 05)  D. Bradley McWilliamsGary P. Luquette           
  02)  Roger A. Brown 06)  Thomas C. SchievelbeinWilliam H. Schumann, III           
  03)  Stephen G. HanksDavid Dickson 07)  Mary L. Shafer-Malicki           
  04)  Stephen G. Hanks 04)    Stephen M. Johnson

08)  David A. Trice

           
  

The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposals:

   For Against Abstain  

2.

 

 

Advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation.

 

 

¨

 

 

¨

 

 

¨

  

3.

 

 

3.Approval of our 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan.

¨

¨

¨

4.

 

 

Ratification of the appointment of McDermott’sDeloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2012.2014.

 

 

¨

 

 

¨

 

 

¨

  

 

The shares represented by this proxy when properly executed will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned Stockholder(s).If no direction is made, this proxy will be voted FOR ALL for item 1, and FOR items 2, 3, and 3.4. If any other matters properly come before the meeting, including procedural matters and matters relating to the conduct of the meeting, the persons named in this proxy willare authorized to vote in their discretion.

     
 

For address changes and/or comments, please check this box and write them on the back where indicated.

¨

Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting.

 

¨

 

¨

¨

       
            

Yes

No

    YesNo             

Please sign your name exactly as it appears hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee, guardian or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. When signing as joint tenants, all parties in the joint tenancy must sign. If a signer is a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by duly authorized officer.

       
                 
                      
                      
  

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]

  

Date        

       

Signature (Joint Owners)                

 

Date        

        

 


LOGOLOGO  

McDermott International, Inc.

 

Annual Meeting

 

Thursday,Tuesday, May 10, 20126, 2014 at 10:00 a.m.

 

757 N. Eldridge Parkway, 14th FloorThe Westin Houston Hotel

945 Gessner Road

Houston, Texas 7707977024

  

 

  

Dear Stockholder:

 

McDermott International, Inc. encourages you to vote the shares electronically through the Internet or the telephone, which are available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. This eliminates the need to return the proxy card.

 

Your electronic vote authorizes the named proxies in the same manner as if you marked, signed, dated and returned the proxy card.

 

If you choose to vote the shares electronically, there is no need for you to mail back the proxy card.

 

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:

The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com

  

IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG PERFORATION,

DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE

 

 

   M432100-P20059        M69093-P47785

 

  

 

McDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.

This proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors

Annual Meeting of Stockholders - Thursday,Tuesday, May 10, 20126, 2014 at 10:00 a.m.

 

The undersigned hereby appoints Stephen M. JohnsonDavid Dickson and Liane K. Hinrichs, and each of them individually as proxies, each with the power to appoint his or her substitute, and hereby authorizes them to represent and to vote, as designated on the reverse side of this ballot, all of the shares of Common Stock of MCDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC. (“McDermott”) that the stockholder(s) is/are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at 10:00 a.m. local time, on Thursday,Tuesday, May 10, 20126, 2014 at 757 N. Eldridge Parkway, 14th floor,The Westin Houston Hotel, 945 Gessner Road, Houston, Texas 77079,77024 and any adjournment or postponement thereof.

 

THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED BY THE STOCKHOLDER(S). IF NO SUCH DIRECTIONS ARE MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES LISTED UNDER ITEM 1 ON THE REVERSE SIDE FOR THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND FOR EACH OF ITEMS 2, 3 AND 3.4. THE PROXY HOLDERS NAMED ABOVE ALSO WILL VOTE IN THEIR DISCRETION ON ANY OTHER MATTER THAT MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING.

 

THE UNDERSIGNED ACKNOWLEDGES RECEIPT OF MCDERMOTT’S ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20112013 AND ITS NOTICE OF 20122014 ANNUAL MEETING AND RELATED PROXY STATEMENT.

 

ATTENTION PARTICIPANTS IN MCDERMOTT’S THRIFT PLAN:If you holdthese shares of McDermott common stockCommon Stock are held through the McDermottThe Thrift Plan for Employees of McDermott Incorporated and Participating Subsidiary and Affiliated Companies (the “Thrift“McDermott Thrift Plan”), this proxy covers all shares for which the undersigned has the right to give voting instructions to Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company (“Vanguard”), Trustee of the McDermott Thrift Plan. Your proxy must be received no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 7, 2012.1, 2014. Any shares of McDermott common stockCommon Stock held in the McDermott Thrift Plan that are not voted or for which Vanguard does not receive timely voting instructions, will be voted in the same proportion as the shares for which Vanguard receives timely voting instructions from other participants in the McDermott Thrift Plan.

 

PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY USING THE REPLY CARD ENVELOPE

 

   
     
   Address Changes/Comments:  

 

      
    
   

 

      
    
             
  

 

(If you noted any Address Changes/Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.)

 

CONTINUED AND TO BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE